this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
81 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

10220 readers
757 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Byline:

Linda Royle says airline initially wouldn't compensate because she can't prove ownership of missing items

Excerpt:

When Linda Royle opened up her returned carry-on suitcase, she was disgusted to find not only her personal possessions missing, but several items — like two toiletry bags, a ticket scanner and a knife — were now in her bag.

Air Canada initially refused to compensate the Newfoundland woman, but told CBC News in a statement Thursday that it had looked at her case again and would contact Royle to "finalize her claim."

In an email, which CBC News has reviewed, Royle was told by baggage claims representative Dana Esteban on July 5 that because Royle didn't have receipts for the items she claimed were missing, Esteban couldn't confirm she owned the items.

CBC News asked Air Canada for an interview about Royle's case. An unidentified spokesperson replied to that request, asking for more details.

Two days after the CBC News request, Royle was contacted by a company representative who said her case had been further reviewed.

In a statement to CBC News on Thursday, Air Canada said it requires customers to provide claims, through receipts, for items valued above $350.

"Our baggage claims team re-looked at this case and found that the individual items being claimed were under the threshold," it said.

The spokesperson then told CBC News over email its security team is reviewing Royle's case.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Hahaha of course I have fucking receipts for everything I own. How do they even prove it was in the bag to begin with?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I definitely have my receipt for this 77” OLED TV that was absolutely in my checked bag, and is totally missing now.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The ridiculous part is there's absolutely security footage of them with the bag; that can be easily found by cross referencing when they checked in or entered the security line up.

(Y'all get your tickets scanned right? Hard to tell what modern shit is standard or just standard outside USA)

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Eh. The footage can’t see inside the bag

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

True but even then it was a carry on bag. Meaning it goes through that conveyor belt scanner with the TV screen everyone can see. I would very surprised if they are not backing up the footage from the scanner either directly or indirectly via CCTV, for liability purposes. That would verify the contents she's claiming.

Then there's the knife she found inside. That alone should prompt a full chain of custody investigation. If her bag wasn't tampered with; how did she get a knife onto the plane?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

Fair points. Only thing I would question is if they are backing up the x-ray video feed, that’s an enormous amount of data, and I would bet their backups don’t go back very far.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 6 days ago

Those x-ray machines don't record video?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)