this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
19 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12117 readers
445 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] potate@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm actually shocked it's that low - particularly in light of the degree of neglect it's received.

The 24 Sussex Drive fiasco has gone on way too long due to being way too politicized.

The fact of the matter is that being the leader of a large country comes with risks - you need security. Either we tell PMs to live at home and then try to make their home suitably secure - at immense cost and annoyance to neighbours as there's now continuous RCMP presence, or, like most countries, we pick one house, get it fit for purpose, and then the current PM gets to live there.

No, it doesn't need to be gold plated everything a la Trump, but a large, well maintained residence, with room for an on site security detail, staff, and room for hosting obligations does not seem as absurd as any of the alternatives I can think of.

I think the figure is likely low - cost estimates usually are, and there isn't even a design yet.

They're probably hoping to exceed the goal, but they've kept the door open to using governnent funds if they have to.