this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
26 points (88.2% liked)

Canada

12149 readers
662 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ottawa's reaction to a new Chinese law on ethnic unity is tepid and does not live up to Canada's promise to stop foreign governments from threatening diaspora abroad, a Uyghur rights activist said.

The law, which Beijing enacted in early July, gives a legal basis for the Chinese government to prosecute people or organizations outside China if their actions are deemed to harm the progress of "ethnic unity."

"It is a textbook example of transnational oppression," said Mehmet Tohti, executive director of the Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project.

"Our reaction to China is fading away, day by day, week by week. And then we don't hear too much about transnational repression or gross violations of human rights."

China says the law promotes harmony among the country's 55 ethnic groups, who make up just under nine per cent of the country's 1.4 billion population. The law mandates the use of Mandarin Chinese as the primary language in education.

The law says all Chinese citizens have a duty to "forge a common consciousness of the Chinese nation according to law and the constitution."

It may impact minorities like Tibetans and Uyghurs, who have protested Beijing policies in the past, including through violent means.

...

Canada's ambassador to United Nations agencies in Geneva, Peter MacDougall, listed the law along a series of issues that Ottawa is watching, in a June 16 statement to the United Nations Human Rights Council, responding to an annual report on human rights worldwide.

"We are also concerned about the ethnic unity law in China, and call for respect of the human rights of minorities," he said, while also touching on unrelated issues in Afghanistan, Iran and Ukraine.

Tohti said he's stunned Ottawa had nothing to say about the risks of the law being used to persecute people in Canada and elsewhere.

"It is a vague and very weak statement," Tohti said. "The nature of Chinese transnational repression, that dimension is almost ignored. And that should be the key focus for Canada."

...

Tohti said there is particularly a risk of China issuing arrest warrants that could see people arrested if they travel to countries with extradition treaties with China such as South Korea. Already, Hong Kong's sweeping national security law has been used to issue bounties for activists abroad, including in Canada.

He said Ottawa should mount a global effort to protect Chinese dissidents from the law, but he fears the government has given up on publicly raising human rights issues ever since Prime Minister Mark Carney's visit to Beijing in January.

Tohti noted the Carney government made transnational repression a priority when it hosted the G7 summit last year.

"We should be playing a leadership role. Now we almost drop all of this important leverage from our agenda, and so we are talking softly now. We don't talk too much about China's human rights," he said.

...

Deputy Conservative Leader Melissa Lantsman called the law "oppression with a legal stamp" by the Chinese Communist Party.

"Beijing’s new 'ethnic unity law' is just the latest tool in the CCP’s playbook of control, from crushing minority rights at home to menacing Taiwan abroad. Authoritarianism doesn’t stop at borders with this," she wrote on the platform X.

The European Union and the U.S. State Department have said they will not allow the new Chinese law to be applied within their territories. Canada has not explicitly said that.

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Where did i mention the word murder?

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 days ago

Hundreds of Han Chinese have been killed and hundreds of millions of dollars worth of infrastructure and private property have been destroyed by religious extremists in Xinjiang. At the radical end, the beliefs of an element of that society are incompatible with the stable, secular humanist

You can believe whatever you want, but once your beliefs motivate, and allow you to morally justify, the murder of your neighbors, you have broken the social contract of peaceful society and are no longer entitled to its protections.

Honestly, I think the tactic of isolation, re-education, and rehabilitation is REMARKABLY reserved and humane given the already unacceptable loss of human life.

Keep in mind that while the Uhygurs today represent an ethnic minority in the region, that is only after a centuries long history of organized military oppression and violence against the Han Chinese at their hands.