this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
26 points (88.2% liked)

Canada

12149 readers
602 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ottawa's reaction to a new Chinese law on ethnic unity is tepid and does not live up to Canada's promise to stop foreign governments from threatening diaspora abroad, a Uyghur rights activist said.

The law, which Beijing enacted in early July, gives a legal basis for the Chinese government to prosecute people or organizations outside China if their actions are deemed to harm the progress of "ethnic unity."

"It is a textbook example of transnational oppression," said Mehmet Tohti, executive director of the Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project.

"Our reaction to China is fading away, day by day, week by week. And then we don't hear too much about transnational repression or gross violations of human rights."

China says the law promotes harmony among the country's 55 ethnic groups, who make up just under nine per cent of the country's 1.4 billion population. The law mandates the use of Mandarin Chinese as the primary language in education.

The law says all Chinese citizens have a duty to "forge a common consciousness of the Chinese nation according to law and the constitution."

It may impact minorities like Tibetans and Uyghurs, who have protested Beijing policies in the past, including through violent means.

...

Canada's ambassador to United Nations agencies in Geneva, Peter MacDougall, listed the law along a series of issues that Ottawa is watching, in a June 16 statement to the United Nations Human Rights Council, responding to an annual report on human rights worldwide.

"We are also concerned about the ethnic unity law in China, and call for respect of the human rights of minorities," he said, while also touching on unrelated issues in Afghanistan, Iran and Ukraine.

Tohti said he's stunned Ottawa had nothing to say about the risks of the law being used to persecute people in Canada and elsewhere.

"It is a vague and very weak statement," Tohti said. "The nature of Chinese transnational repression, that dimension is almost ignored. And that should be the key focus for Canada."

...

Tohti said there is particularly a risk of China issuing arrest warrants that could see people arrested if they travel to countries with extradition treaties with China such as South Korea. Already, Hong Kong's sweeping national security law has been used to issue bounties for activists abroad, including in Canada.

He said Ottawa should mount a global effort to protect Chinese dissidents from the law, but he fears the government has given up on publicly raising human rights issues ever since Prime Minister Mark Carney's visit to Beijing in January.

Tohti noted the Carney government made transnational repression a priority when it hosted the G7 summit last year.

"We should be playing a leadership role. Now we almost drop all of this important leverage from our agenda, and so we are talking softly now. We don't talk too much about China's human rights," he said.

...

Deputy Conservative Leader Melissa Lantsman called the law "oppression with a legal stamp" by the Chinese Communist Party.

"Beijing’s new 'ethnic unity law' is just the latest tool in the CCP’s playbook of control, from crushing minority rights at home to menacing Taiwan abroad. Authoritarianism doesn’t stop at borders with this," she wrote on the platform X.

The European Union and the U.S. State Department have said they will not allow the new Chinese law to be applied within their territories. Canada has not explicitly said that.

...

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CanadaPlus -1 points 2 days ago

We're not really in the market for making new enemies right now, unfortunately.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Genocide is a-okay

Signed Canada

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Almost half of the Canadian population isn't even ready to reconcile our own ongoing genocide...

[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

A really ironic take given that you're justifying genocide in your own thread.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

What is happening in Xinjiang is not genocide.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

It is odd for them to appeal to us of all people.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What IS the right way to unify 1,400,000,000 people into a cohesive, functional society where the rights of the individual do not detract from the greater good?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not impart on their language or culture/tradition. Even religion is allowed in people's own homes/temples.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

And if those traditions aren't kept within their homes and places of worship?

What happens when beliefs become radicalized and inspire violence against other ethnic groups? Or disruption of public order or the freedoms of others?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Punish the act not the belief.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How do you prevent those who hold the beliefs from insulating their children from alternate perspectives? How do you prevent the negativity from festering and growing? How do you break the cycle?

This isn't a uniquely Chinese question. In fact, take China out of the equation, how do we prevent the spread of white Christian nationalism in North America?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Uplifting societies vulnerable.

A secular education helps. Food/social programmes also help.

Violence is for the capitalists, you must appeal to the consesinous of the workers.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

And if they won't participate in that secular education consensually? Our public education system has become consistently more inclusive and progressive decade by decade, so in responses, christian fundamentalists are trying to dismantle it and/or homeschooling their children in record numbers.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What are they going to complain about if their standard of living is increased?

Give students breakfast and lunch, if they stay late then have a dinner for them.

You'll find a lot more people supporting it.

However that's just one example. Of course you can look at residential schools as a legitimate reason people might be hesitant.

If we actually funded healthcare then people wouldn't think private is better.

Public outreach, host events that people can go to and reach them there.

You don't need to convince everyone, just make progress.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

China has invested >8,300,000,000,000 yuan into improving material conditions in Xinjiang in the last 15 years and they are still dealing with racially motivated attacks against ethnic Han Chinese and extensive infrastructure damage caused by domestic terror attacks.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And as more people grow up with better lives, less will be radicalized.

Even if we say those 15 years had a good quality of life. That still means no adults were born into that.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

So how many lives are a reasonable cost while we wait for these people to get their shit together?

Estimates put the Han Chinese civilian death toll at 1000.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They're all Chinese or at least that's the goal.

So why differentiate with Han?

Also it's because it's a lasting peace. You can look at Europe's fight against the Jew for how oppression doesn't work.

How did Christians get rid of paganism? A soft approach, put a cross in their place of worship and after a few hundred years they think they're Christians. Celebrate their customs, winter solstice is about a jolly fat guy and you get gifts. Which one do you think people picked?

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because the Uhygurs aren't killing other Uhygurs, they're killing Han Chinese.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It seems short sighted to generate animosity between two groups you hope to unite.

How many Han have the Han killed? That should show why blaming the group over the individual doesn't make sense.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This isn't petty street violence, it's a targeted, ideologically motivated campaign that has armed, foreign funded militants targeting a civilian population.

Should Ukraine have simply acquiesced to the Donbas Peoples Militia and Russia?

If America starts arming Alberta separatists, should we just give them what they want?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ukraine would be the Uyghurs if we want to compare because they're the minority.

Zhuge Liang conquered the south by winning their hearts. He knew force would result in further rebellion.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ukraine would be the Uyghurs if we want to compare because they're the minority.

If you believe that then you have a poor understanding of both situations.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

I think it's a bad comparison.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Any belief can be radicalized including chinese government belief. China is already united with it's diversity. Rhis law will have the opposite effect just like here in Quebec province, our leaders reject multiculturalism and is implementing an extreme version of secularism that restrict people fundamental rights and expulse people who do not abide

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Where did i mention the word murder?

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 days ago

Hundreds of Han Chinese have been killed and hundreds of millions of dollars worth of infrastructure and private property have been destroyed by religious extremists in Xinjiang. At the radical end, the beliefs of an element of that society are incompatible with the stable, secular humanist

You can believe whatever you want, but once your beliefs motivate, and allow you to morally justify, the murder of your neighbors, you have broken the social contract of peaceful society and are no longer entitled to its protections.

Honestly, I think the tactic of isolation, re-education, and rehabilitation is REMARKABLY reserved and humane given the already unacceptable loss of human life.

Keep in mind that while the Uhygurs today represent an ethnic minority in the region, that is only after a centuries long history of organized military oppression and violence against the Han Chinese at their hands.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 days ago

How many Quebecois have been killed by anglophones opposing Bill 101?

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

We have enough animosity at the moment dealing with the United States of Assholes... let's hold off on antagonizing China for bit.