this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
201 points (98.6% liked)

Canada

11574 readers
875 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Typically it's not a choice - it's a result of your ballot system.

Ranked ballots, directly for candidates, can easily prevent this. People need to trust that their vote is not squandered if they throw in behind some longshot, or if they like several similar options.

Juuust don't do "Ranked Choice" specifically, for single-winner elections. The multi-winner version, Single Transferable Voting, works as intended. RCV gets stupid results and has suspicious backing. You want a Condorcet system like "Ranked Pairs."

Or... just check as many names as you like, for Approval Voting. That approximates Condorcet results and there's no good reason it isn't the default.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I say "typically" because of Sri Lanka, which has ranked ballots, but is apparently too thick to use them. Most voters still pick one guy and cross their fingers. They have the option to vote for every candidate they do not despise, if their first-, second-, and tenth-favorite candidates cannot win. But for some goddamn reason, they act like their system is as broken as America's.