this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
58 points (96.8% liked)

Canada

11645 readers
708 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hmmm. The article indicates a broken window, and further 'medical and forensic evidence'. If the broken window was the point of access, it might indicate that a lot of the cuts sustained by the alleged intruder could be traced to the broken glass. That fact would change the entire scenario. It then becomes 'much ado about nothing'.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's a few ways I would like to take this but also I think overall I agree with you.

I don't go into it to much but where I'm slowly adapting my views are on a few issues.

One is that I think one is that no cost should be incurred by anyone who defended themselves. I do totally get the argument that everybody deserves justice including criminals. But the stories I've come across tend to highlight how self defense laws are lacking in Canada and there is a lot of room between allowing all killings and some kind of castle doctrine.

The second issue for me is as I've aged, I can't tell you what the hell police do. The amount of times myself or someone i know has called them, only for them to say "not much we can do, just file a report online" is too many. Yet majority of my municipal taxes go to them. So for me I am coming around to the idea that we need to pull back some of the responsibility society has given to police and reclaim it ourselves. They're not keeping us safe. They are now refusing to act when the government tells them to. Because of this I think society does need to go back to the idea that we can't rely on the justice system.

[–] DarylInCanada@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The amount of times myself or someone i know has called them, only for them to say “not much we can do, just file a report online”

Exactly how high do you want your taxes to go? Complete coverage for all o the calls would be prohibitively expensive, and I suspect you would be one of the first people to protest your high taxes.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If they cannot provide this basic service then we as the public need to the law in our own hands. The entier reason we do not is we entrust that to police. But they no longer serve. They are there to increase their budget and militarize themselves to protect only certain people.

[–] DarylInCanada@lemmy.ca 1 points 24 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago) (1 children)

So a privatized police force, on contract to only the wealthy who can afford them, accountable only to their employers?

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago) (1 children)

That's the one. But even then, they can't be held accountable. Look at the gun buy back. Police all over are refusing to do their job. Same happened during covid. Police forces just flat out refused to listen if they don't want to. In America it also is happening more frequently. The police refused to action what the state government were asking of them.

Yet every year it's Police budgets that eat up the Majority of all budgets. So what are they doing?

[–] DarylInCanada@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 minutes ago (1 children)

They are doing what they are capable of within their budgets, that are constrained by the taxpayer.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

No they're not. They have the largest budgets every where. They are misallocating their budget. They are fat on the hog. Salaries and benefits are too high. Their equipment egregious. They are not providing even basic law enforcement capabilities. They should be the first place to look for budget cuts until they get in order

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

But the stories I’ve come across tend to highlight how self defense laws are lacking in Canada

Here's the thing. I hear this a lot. And every single time that I've ever been presented with an example, and looked into it deep enough, or enough time has passed that more information came to light, every obvious case of Canada's self-defence laws "failing" has always turned out to be "No, actually, in this case there really was a line crossed."

That's not to say that no law can ever fail. Laws do get misapplied, and no law is perfect. There are edge cases where people will simply disagree; that happens a lot with the law. There are entire fields of academia basically devoted to disagreeing about laws. But it is remarkable that I have never yet seen even one clear cut case of "Wow, that guy totally did not deserve to get charged with anything, he was clearly just defending himself," that didn't turn out to be something far more ambiguous, if not outright damning to the defendant when the details are known.