this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
167 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11789 readers
1665 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/61737959

The utter audacity of this.

The exemptions would be retroactive, meaning all existing, outstanding requests for information from these offices would be scrapped, including Mr. Ford’s phone logs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fucking laughable, we already do

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you have specific examples? Or is this a commentary on just how much you can afford to spend on a legal team?

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anyone with "generational trauma"?

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

So maybe I'm very misinformed, but I'm unsure how this is an example of different rules. Care to elaborate? I can generously grant that social pressure/policy/issues don't provide supports but the legal framework doesn't to my knowledge favour any one class (aside from how much you want to spend on a legal team), and further, such effects are often taken into consideration by judges (if and when it gets that far).