this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
167 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11789 readers
1630 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/61737959

The utter audacity of this.

The exemptions would be retroactive, meaning all existing, outstanding requests for information from these offices would be scrapped, including Mr. Ford’s phone logs.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago

Yup, that's exactly what a corrupt politician would do

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The exemptions would be retroactive

Makes me think that they must have got wind of a FOI request that requests some info that they really don’t want to get out

[–] BuoyantCitrus@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The proposed changes follow the government’s loss of a court battle, initially launched by Global News, over the call logs for Premier Doug Ford’s personal cellphone, which he uses for government business.

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah. Must be something real juicy in those call logs

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

A lot of calls to a certain resort in Florida?

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Anyone that thinks their phone calls are private really needs to look into the reality of the situation

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm putting my money on kickbacks relating to Ontario Place.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

or the RCMP Greenbelt investigation..LOL.. as if.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

So they can hide wrongdoing and incompetence. Absolutely insane when right wingers demand shit like this. It's anti democratic and ensures increases in wrongdoing and incompetence.

[–] DCinBC@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

That’s like… that’s like an open admission that they plan to do corrupt things.

I mean imagine if your contractor said, “Well, I’d like to do this job for you but I want you to agree that you don’t need a quote and you won’t hire an inspector to check my work.” Or if your dealer at a casino said “Let me just deal the hands out behind this screen here where you can’t see what I’m doing, trust me bro.”

Transparency is the only thing that keeps politicians or business people honest.

When they openly say they don’t want transparency, they are telling us that they plan to be dishonest. It’s that simple.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

His Basket Weaving PhD.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

you'll never know.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In case you didn't remember the cons still ran Ontario...

[–] twopi@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Still run. And still have a majority, got a third straight one last year.

[–] tehWrapper@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If our taxes are paying you we have a right to know.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

they guy yelling at people to get a job?

[–] Undearius@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago

Through the process, the government has admitted Ford uses his personal phone for government business, but argued it would be an invasion of his privacy to release it.

Then don't do public business on a private device.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

More like, "I should be able to do whatever gets me what i want."

[–] ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca 9 points 1 week ago

"Ontario still sliding towards authoritarianism", this and other obvious news at 5.

[–] tehWrapper@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

So much corruption.

[–] ivanvector@piefed.ca 8 points 1 week ago

There is obviously something bad that has already been identified by an FOI request that they don't want to be made public. There's no other conceivable reason to do this at all, and there is no possible way this can be of any benefit to taxpayers or residents of Ontario at all.

[–] mister_newbie@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Can't spell corruption without an o, p, and c.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

we have to see who in the press asked for an FOI and what about.

But FFS Ontario, what do you see in this guy? Is is sex appeal?

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Oh you bet it's sex appeal

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nah Canada isn't going to have different rules for different classes sorry.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fucking laughable, we already do

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you have specific examples? Or is this a commentary on just how much you can afford to spend on a legal team?

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anyone with "generational trauma"?

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

So maybe I'm very misinformed, but I'm unsure how this is an example of different rules. Care to elaborate? I can generously grant that social pressure/policy/issues don't provide supports but the legal framework doesn't to my knowledge favour any one class (aside from how much you want to spend on a legal team), and further, such effects are often taken into consideration by judges (if and when it gets that far).

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Who’s gunna stop them, another sub-50% voter turnout because the Canadian electorate ranges from insane conservative morons to completely uninformed “moderates” with only a small amount of progressives who often get easily scared into letting the center and right get away with shit like this?