379
submitted 6 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 367 points 6 months ago

I'm definitely not voting for Hunter Biden now

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's all maga wanted!

load more comments (32 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 153 points 6 months ago

Why wasn't the NRA fighting for his second Ammendment rights?

[-] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 53 points 6 months ago

National (R)epublican Association. That's why.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 17 points 6 months ago

The NRA will not defend anyone if drugs or police are involved.

Leaving aside the NRA a lot of 2A Advocates were / are hoping that this case will bring an end to these questions being on the 4473 form. They are obviously unconstitutional and they should not be on there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 13 points 6 months ago

They only do that when it's politically convenient

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 132 points 6 months ago

Appeal to the Supreme Court and let them overturn the conviction on the History and Tradition grounds that there's no historical precedent from infringing on the gun rights of people on crack. 5th Circuit already ruled on this matter and acquitted the defendant on similar grounds, in the case USA v. Daniels.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 81 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca5/22-60596/22-60596-2023-08-09.html

For anyone curious. I mean I disagree with these ridiculous overlay broad second amendment interpretations personally, but looks like he has an appeal argument based on how the courts have been treating the second amendment lately. I look forward to the mental gymnastics of the second amendment extremists on this case. Seeing marijuana spelled "marihuana" over and over in the ruling above is also pretty funny.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 112 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Just another example of Joe Biden weaponizing the Department of Justice! ...oh wait.

In all seriousness, most people could see this result coming from a mile away. The prosecution had a solid case against him. I expect the justice system to hold everyone accountable for their actions, regardless of who they are. Republicans expecting us to do backflips to defend Hunter Biden as some sort of "gotcha" are completely out of their gourd. He earned this conviction through his own deeds, just like how Trump earned his.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They don't understand that we don't worship Biden like they do Trump. Hell, most of us don't even like him that much.

[-] thisbenzingring 15 points 6 months ago

My sister was the victim of public enemy #1 in my state. She survived but there's cyber stalking laws now because of her. Biden as a Senator sponsored her to speak to Congress. She's the recipient of the Jefferson Award.

My sister doesn't like his politics, she probably didn't vote for him. But there's no question that Joe Biden is a good person. He is

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think he's a good person, but I agree with your sister and don't like his politics.

I will most definitely be voting for him and anyone else who isn't a Republican for the rest of my life, though.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

It's kind of a shitty law in the first place, but he was assuredly guilty of it. It's still unusual that they went after him for it when it wasn't connected to any other crime (which is usually when federal prosecutors use this law) and really unusual that the judge threw out the plea bargain.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 103 points 6 months ago

Surely now the NRA will come out and protest this flagrant violation of Hunter Biden's second amendment rights!

[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

There is a strong argument on constitutional grounds here, it's why it's almost never charged.

You can drink and buy a gun.

Do a little crack?

(Okay, a lot of crack)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 97 points 6 months ago

I know multiple people, several of them fine upstanding Republicans that have violated this same law by lying on this same form. Hell, one of them has done it repeatedly in order to straw purchase firearms for his son, a convicted felon.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 83 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Wouldn't it be unfortunate if someone reported that kind of thing? Which one should do, since we're talking about a convicted felon possessing firearms.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 19 points 6 months ago

we had one around here who shot up highland and whos bussiness went bust. Its funny how the community does not appreciate such loving family behaviour.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 13 points 6 months ago

Highland Park, IL? I know someone who was there and had to hide in doorways on the street just below the shooter before sprinting away, while his friend was in the crowd being targeted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 97 points 6 months ago

Well it's official.

I will not be voting for Hunter Biden in November.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 94 points 6 months ago

I guess I’m not voting for Hunter anymore.

[-] ganksy@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago

I admit I was on the fence. Now definitely not. Couldn't in all good conscience vote for a convicted criminal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 55 points 6 months ago

Well, since nominating convicted felons is in vogue now, Hunter Biden 2028?

[-] troybot@midwest.social 39 points 6 months ago

Only 3 felony charges. Those are rookie numbers.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 45 points 6 months ago

Clearly Biden rigged this to politically damage Biden

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 45 points 6 months ago

If I cared about this guy, or he was important in anyway, I'd feel something probably.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago

That this is even news is just odd.

I guess I'd take note if Trump's kids or Kushner were convicted, but then they were in and out of the White House far more frequently than Hunter. Nepotism ran rampant.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 38 points 6 months ago

they had official positions, they did not just hang around with pa.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 26 points 6 months ago

Are you telling me that a white rich person was convicted of a gun crime, in America?

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Ironically if he wasnt a rich white guy, then he would have either gotten away with it entirely, or would have got a misdemeanour plea deal.

Literally the only reason this became a felony conviction is because his name is Biden.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Welp, I'm convinced. I certainly won't be settling for only the FATHER of a felon. I'm going to get the REAL THING.

[-] ganksy@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

Wonder if this opens the gate for cops on steroids to be charged?

[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm genuinely confused as to why I'm supposed to care? Yay, good for you, conservatives! They got trump, so YOU got Hunter Biden! Wow, good job! Anyway....

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

I get that the law is the law, and the jury has to rule as such (barring nullification), but this is such a stupid law.

None of our other constitutional rights are contingent on not using controlled substances.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] noxy@yiffit.net 18 points 6 months ago

I don't give a fuck about any Biden beyond my firm-but-disheartening vote for Joe, but this particular law is bullshit. That question ought to be removed from the federal form.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

What upsets me is that it's pretty much never actually enforced except as an add-on for violent criminals.

I used to sell guns, and people would attempt to illegally buy guns from my store all the time and the Feds didn't do shit. I had convicted felons on camera outside the store giving cash to people to go buy guns for them, and law enforcement didn't care.

But THIS they'll prosecute.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Wonder how Don Jr and his daddy filled out their paper work?

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 13 points 6 months ago

Whoop de fucking doo.

Since this was never actually newsworthy, can he go away now?

[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Rigged Witch Hunt Scam third world two tiered justice system /s

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
379 points (97.3% liked)

News

23625 readers
4079 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS