513
Crazy that the line is at sexual misconduct but undermining a democracy is ok.
I mean......at the very least it's consistant. I never had an issue with Bill Clinton getting a BJ. I felt like Hillary should have the right to be mad, but everyone else should fuck off.
The right on the other hand lost their shit. They made it into a 4 year big deal. If Bill had just told the truth on the stand, that he got sucked off and loved it, then they'd have no tools to impeach him. But to them the sexual deviancy was the big deal to them.
I guess same here. They don't care about laws or the country, but if you include sexual misdoings, they faint like a karen in a church seeing people outside having fun.
That's just a facade they put up in public. Newt Gingrich lead the charge on that impeachment and at the time was cheating on his wife (later to deliver her divorce papers at the hospital where she was receiving cancer treatments and leaving her and their children completely broke).
Furthermore, you can look at all the scandals with organizations like the Boy Scouts of America or the Catholic church and they still get unwavering support from the right.
It's not though. See Thomas. Also the seemingly never ending parade of GOP officials.
If it's their team it's NBD, I'm very surprised this has had any consequences. I bet it's more he bit the hand that fed him.
If it's their team it's fake news
They always denied it was about the sex though. Even at the time. We all knew it was, but they constantly were claiming it was about lying on the stand.
And then Larry Flynt inadvertently helped them on that front when trying to shame them by putting out a report detailing all the Republican congresspeople who had affairs. I appreciate what he tried to do, but that made it even easier for them to say it wasn't about the sex since no one got rid of them for an affair.
It was about the letter after his name. If sex was illegal (and I think sex with subordinates often should be), they would have gone for that. Lying under oath is illegal, so they went for that. This wasn't some principled mission, this was to stop the guy they disagreed with using whatever would stick.
You'd think they'd have a problem with mr 34 felonies being a rapist and paying a pornstar for sex while his pregnant wife was at home.
Like stormy. He doesn't say he didn't pay the media to influence an election. Apparently he thinks that part was ok. He throws a fit saying he didn't have sex with her.
Sexual misconduct isn’t slowing Trump down.
Ahh, but there was money involved! See?
Crazy that there's a line at all anymore.
According to the report, Kindred created a hostile work environment by incessantly "discuss[ing] his past dating life, his romantic preferences, his sex life, the law clerks’ boyfriends and dating lives, his divorce, his interest in and communications with potential romantic or sexual partners, and his disparaging opinions of his colleagues. He also made disparaging comments about public and political figures. Some examples of these comments include: 'I was a huge hit at dinner Partly due to how much s--- I talked about Sarah Palin'; 'I told a republican [state] senator to eat a d---'; and '[a senator] is worried that I can kick [] his a--.'"
He also rated people based on "f---ability" in the presence of subordinates, and retaliated against clerks who came forward to say they were uncomfortable with his behavior.
As Trumpian as you can get.
Wait until they hear what Clarence Thomas did
I don't think I've ever seen anything good related to people who are Trump affiliated.
Sometimes they actually get sentenced to jail but nothing we'd want our kids to look up to or helping society improve. Only the best people of course.
`According to the report, Kindred created a hostile work environment by incessantly "discuss[ing] his past dating life, his romantic preferences, his sex life, the law clerks’ boyfriends and dating lives, his divorce, his interest in and communications with potential romantic or sexual partners, and his disparaging opinions of his colleagues. He also made disparaging comments about public and political figures. Some examples of these comments include: 'I was a huge hit at dinner Partly due to how much s--- I talked about Sarah Palin'; 'I told a republican [state] senator to eat a d---'; and '[a senator] is worried that I can kick [] his a--.'"
Why can't this happen to at least two SCOTUS jurists?
Judge Qanon??
Oh. Pfft. Well, good anyway.
On Monday, however, the Judicial Council of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released a report going into extensive detail on the allegations against Kindred, and announced that he was pressured into resigning under referral to the Judicial Conference to consider impeachment.
I am genuinely surprised "pressure" was enough and he didn't force them to follow through with the impeachment.
I am guessing that the pressure was, "resign or you'll be impeached, and you will be impeached."
MAGA translation: "Cowardly judge abandons MAGA, surrenders to woke mob."
Since the Judicial Conference can't impeach him and the House is MAGA, I dunno, I think if he held on he might still have his lifetime appointment. What's a little sexual assault among jurists? If it's ok enough for the Supreme Court, it's ok enough for this chump.
99 bottles of fear on the wall 99 bottles of fear. If one of those bottles should happen to fall. 98 bottles of fear on the wall
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
513 points (98.9% liked)
News
22470 readers
4702 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS