961
Again ! (jlai.lu)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 174 points 5 months ago

How does this happen? Like people on the forum get into some argument about the turn radius of some tank and how they shouldn’t have lost a game, and then it escalates until someone posts the tank specs so they can be right on the internet?

[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 167 points 5 months ago

Yes. This is apparently so much of a problem that US and other nations include this in security training for military personnel and contractors. They literally teach you not to get in arguments online about weapons capabilities and whatnot because they know people are dumb enough to post classified info just so they can be like "ackshually..." on an internet forum.

[-] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 97 points 5 months ago

From what I’ve seen it’s usually that Gaijin have something wrong about the vehicle and so people leak actual classified information because they want it to be corrected.

MilSim people can be an odd bunch sometimes

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 60 points 5 months ago

And the devs are like "Are you fucking dumb? We won't use classified info in our game."

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 36 points 5 months ago

Well if it’s something like a turn radius, they can always claim that they just guessed right.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 30 points 5 months ago

Are they under any obligation to protect the classified information if they're not the ones who leaked it?

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 53 points 5 months ago

Knowingly owning or using classified info without proper clearance is, in fact, a crime.

That’s a large part of what Trump’s classified document raid was for. Former presidents usually have a lot of classified stuff to turn over after leaving office. It’s standard practice, (and perfectly legal) to simply send it back (via the proper channels) as soon as you discover you have it. But if you conceal it and refuse to return it (like Trump did) then that’ll land you in some hot water.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 16 points 5 months ago

It's my understanding that you're only required to protect the information if you've actually agreed to do so, which is obviously a retirement for being given access. Elected officials are a weird area where they have a much easier time getting clearance, but they've still made agreements to protect the information.

Trump was authorized to handle classified information in the first place, which is why his mishandling was a problem. I haven't read the actual law, but I'm pretty sure ordinary people who happen across classified information have no duty at all in any direction. If you can show me an example of a random person getting in trouble for sharing classified information that they didn't steal or get others to steal, well, let me know.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CanadaPlus 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

AFAIK it's part of being given some clearance. In most Western countries it's fine to republish already leaked material as a private citizen. How would the media do it otherwise?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 16 points 5 months ago

No. You can publish it if you like. This is how journalists work. You cannot get someone to commit a crime towards getting classified documents (Assange tried to teach people to hack shit and pled guilty to this). But accepting them and publishing them is fine and good.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago
[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

Yea, I had a friend who spent his free time coding how different tarmac temperatures affect the wheels of a fighter plane in a flight sim. (DCS I think)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 69 points 5 months ago

One time it was a Chinese player pissed that their tank ammo wasn’t as strong as it should be so they posted it for the devs to buff

[-] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 5 months ago

It's sometimes this, and it's sometimes Gaijin just claiming something is classified for whatever reason.

Sometimes, a British tank crewman posts technical specs from their manual for the Challenger 2. Sometimes, Gaijin claims that a declassified, internationally available manual for a Cold War era plane is classified. Or the Wikipedia article on a WW2 tank.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ElCanut@jlai.lu 159 points 5 months ago
[-] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 42 points 5 months ago

Thank you! You post quality stuff.

[-] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 26 points 5 months ago

"This marks one of three leaks that have happened in the past week, though not all of them are directly tied to War Thunder. The first related to the release of documents on the Challenger British main battle tanks on the game’s forum, though that information was confirmed to be publically [sic] available from Britain’s National Archive."

[-] ElCanut@jlai.lu 14 points 5 months ago

Why would you call "leak" the disclosure of publicly available information?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Thann@lemmy.ml 26 points 5 months ago

Asked me to disable my adblocker, but I'm just runnng vanadium lol

[-] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago
[-] Baku@aussie.zone 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's also one of those websites that begs you to let it send notifications the moment it loads, and has the ads that follow you and stick to your screen while you scroll.

That said though, I had no issues with Firefox on android + uBlock origin

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 102 points 5 months ago

Honestly these guys are both the smartest and stupidest folks imaginable at the same time - I'm just glad it's the Russians they're screwing over this time haha

[-] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If they were smart, they wouldn't be playing Warthunder in 2024, tho

[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 33 points 5 months ago

Ah yes, they must be playing that other historically accurate plane combat game whose name I totally forgot because it actually doesn't exist and War Thunder is the only option.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 5 months ago

I think their point is that people that play "historically accurate plane combat game" 's are stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] psud@aussie.zone 14 points 5 months ago

There was a Ukrainian Bradley fighting vehicle gunner who took down a Russian main battle tank with the anti-personnel machine gun, and thanked his time playing war thunder for knowing where to hit it when he had no anti-armour and no armour piercing ammo

He took out its optics and turret control

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mikyopii@programming.dev 87 points 5 months ago

The autism of tank nerds never ceases to astound me.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago

Next gen optics on modern MBT catch the whole spectrum

[-] Bread@sh.itjust.works 62 points 5 months ago

Seriously now, how many times has this happened?

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago

Must be a day ending in y.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 47 points 5 months ago

Did someone finally leak the metallurgy of Stalinium?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They just needs to write alien spaceships and then we'd find out about what's really in area 51 within about a week.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

How’s that place not just a den of glowies by now? Bet you can see it from fucking space

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago

How WarThunder was funded:

CIA guy: "So y'know how Wikipedia became a trustworthy source of obscure information just by weaponizing pedantry?"

NSA guy: "I'm listening."

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Is this even noteworthy anymore?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
961 points (99.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6763 readers
631 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS