This is right on target. He's not saying anything Trump hasn't said (or implied), but he's no Trump. This is the same problem ran into. They want someone that projects power and confidence, as well as acts as a surrogate on which they can project their own dark desires about how the world should be.

Trump can be all these things because he has a carefully crafted image of being super wealthy, but also (and more importantly) he's charismatic, funny, and speaks in what basically amount to parables. He very rarely comes right out and says things like "we're going to give bonus votes to people with kids." He might hint at that, or convey the same message through some kind of elliptical digression about some random topic, but he doesn't state things clearly and plainly most of the time. He jokes, teases, and plays the crowd. His rhetoric is open to interpretation, which both lets them project their own ideas onto him but also insist that he didn't really mean whatever his opponent took him to mean. With DeSantis or Vance, all that humor and rhetorical fogginess is gone, and the fascist project is laid bare. That's boring and off-putting--even to many of them who actually agree with the project--because what attracts them isn't a set of policy goals, but rather a particular image of what could be: a vibe.

There are obviously exceptions to this (people who are the Hilary Clintons of the far right and are in it for the technocratic minutiae of implementing fascism), but they're much smaller as a group than the collection of people who want to be caught up in the religious ecstasy of MAGA rallies, and will change the channel when that turns into the nitty gritty of policy. Remember that politics is fundamentally boring to most normal people. In Trump, they're getting something less like politics and more like a sermon, comedy act, and sports rally all rolled into one. So far, they haven't found anyone else able to bridge that gap.

GOOD post

Yeah they never thought fashie would come for them. They haven't figured out "christofash" is just another mask the fash put on to get useful idiots on their side. I wonder if any of these chuds got the noodles to figure that out before their usefulness is over

It’s been most of two decades since I visited 4chan. I remember there used to be a kind of “get fit and fuck bitches” variant of inceldom that ironically enough would blue pill the incels into becoming normal possibly even well adjusted people by covertly awakening them to the reality that if they just put in just a little effort and exit their caves then society stops treating them like vermin.

Is that still a thing?

Why don't they gay-marry other 4chan incels and adopt children?

[Please no, at least the last part]

I sort of get what you mean. If a man says that he does not want to have children it gets inconsiderate reactions. But in a patriarchal setting women bear most of the brunt of child birthing and rearing. Men are expected to, I don't know how to phrase it, do the work that is allegedly societally important while the mothers stay at home and look after the children and the home. Deranged republicans abhor the fact that women have the autonomy to reject this sort of setting which is where the shaming stems from. In my opinion.

Let me know if I am being unclear. I haven't talked about this topic before so I don't know how to articulate my thoughts well.

Cast their children's votes? What does that mean?

"This isn't rocket science here." -- Tom Daschle, U.S. senator from South Dakota, denouncing spending on space-based missile defense

"If the King's English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me." -- Miriam "Ma" Ferguson, Texas governor