365
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by smokebuddy@lemmy.today to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] li10@feddit.uk 153 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

tbf, Caitlin Clark is the only WNBA player that’s profitable, and she’s kinda limited salary wise by the fact that the women’s league in general is not profitable and heavily subsidised by the NBA.

People will bitch about how the men’s league gets paid so much in comparison, then proceed to not watch the women’s league…

If you want it to make money YOU need to support it 🫵

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 50 points 4 months ago

This has always been my stance, Women make up approximately 50% of the population and the WNBA generates 2% of the revenue that the NBA does...

My wife and her friends go to some restaraunt once a month and they buy brand name workout clothes. Go to a game, buy a jersey, take your daughter and make it a thing.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 34 points 4 months ago

This is a great response. If you want to support them, great! Donate, volunteer, watch their games, whatever. For the rest of us, it's an entertainment product. I don't watch WNBA because I don't watch NBA, or any sports. But if you like basketball, yet draw the line at the players' genitals, that's weird.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

I would think that the kind of people who watch NBA, would want to watch the WNBA.

It's the same concepts, but with women. I would think the mostly straight/male sports audience would want to watch their favorite sport where the players are also the gender they like to stare at.

Yet, here we are.

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Have you ever seen a WNBA game? Sure, it's the same sport but that logic applies to middle school basketball teams as well and no one gives a shit about those either regardless of the gender of the athletes involved.

The reason professional sports are fun to watch is you get to see the best athletes in the world push the limits of what is physically possible for a human to achieve. Top level women cannot compete with top level men in any regularly televised sport, including basketball. No one wants to watch Caitlin Clark on channel 3 when LeBron James is doing way more impressive things on channel 6. That's just the way it is. I don't get why people pretend that isn't obvious and get offended by it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Tom_Hanx_the_Actor@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

It's totally unfair to use Caitlin Clark as an example of the pay disparity as well. She's a rookie on a pay scale. Her salary is less than half the average wnba salary. What's really crazy to me is that the average salary is about 150k with only one woman making over 250k. For the salaries to be that flat seems odd compared to other pro sports but it's just a part of the W having less revenue. Athletes have very strong unions also.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 months ago

Is bill burr on lemmy?

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

I'm gonna bet that corporate executives are bigoted assholes and increases in profits won't substantially go to the women players.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 4 months ago

In Brazil, is even more common now to people gather to watch the women football national team, not at the level of the men one, but there's even companies where they close up when any of the two teams play, to give people opportunity to see the game.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 107 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Part of me says the real solution is to stop paying people $12m a year to throw balls around, but then again compared to the amount the people who own the teams and league get, shits chump change.

[-] Soleos@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

It's not that they throw a ball around really well, it's that the NBA brings in over 10 billion in annual revenue because of these players. How much are you willing to pay someone to bring in that amount of money?

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

This is kind of what people are missing. These people really do produce millions of dollars worth of labour. That's how entertainers are paid; the more people want to see their performance, the more that performance is worth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

If anything, more athletes need big paychecks to more evenly distribute wealth from the top. Anything to drive that money into the hands of others.

[-] jmiller@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

The first change needs to be teams pay for their own stadiums instead of them being taxpayer funded from cites and states. I don't care if it will drive tourism, use that money to take care of the purple in the city and make the city a nice place, even make it a nice place for a stadium, but make the team owners/pro leagues pay for their own damn stadium.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Sure but if someone paid you $12m a year to throw a ball around, would you take it?

If another team offered you $13m would you change teams?

If everyone else is getting paid $12m, can I just pay you $50k?

Also if the entire NBA colluded to reduce everyones pay by $1m per year, every year, would that be fair and reasonable?

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 53 points 4 months ago
[-] walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz 14 points 4 months ago

Is that your final answer?

[-] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 50 points 4 months ago

Considering 1 percent of 12 million is 120k I guess that's about right.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago

This reminds me of how well I can do algebra and calculus but need to whip out the calculator for the tip.

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 months ago

Tips are easy. You move the decimal point (10%) and double (20%). Or find 10%, half of 10% is 5% and add that 5% to whatever 10% was for a 15% tip. And fudge the numbers to make the math easier when it makes sense to, it's a tip not a math test.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 months ago

You're going to far. 0% of any sum is 0

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

This is the way I do it. Often I just divide by ten and multiply by two, but I'm a generous tipper, and it's one less head math step.

The funny thing is that this basically how common core math works: get to the answer by doing as much easy math as possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Willy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 months ago

why doesn't she just play in the NBA?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 24 points 4 months ago

If you want a serious answer: athletic ability

She isn’t strong or fast enough

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

In NBA history, only 1 female player has ever been drafted- Luisa Harris. She did not actually make the team though, or anyways she never played in a game. I don't quite remember. The door is open for women to play-the NBA does not prohibit it, nor do any of the "men's leagues"-it just never happens because women are not good enough.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 24 points 4 months ago

The WNBA's revenue of $70 million is what percent of the NBA's revenue of $10 billion?

[-] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

And how much of The profitability of that industry is owed to state sponsorship, tax breaks, and Monopoly exceptions?

Professional sports needs to learn how to pay its own bills before it can be used as an example of why women's sports aren't profitable.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Is that... Nick Kroll and John Mulaney?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Good4Nuthin@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

either way, that would buy a lotta tuna.

[-] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Nick Kroll does not look impressed. Then again, he never does.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Nick Kroll and John Mulaney for those who don't know.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
365 points (96.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27191 readers
4189 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS