619
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] takeheart@lemmy.world 159 points 2 months ago

It's well known that the judiciary at the time was very lenient towards right wing extremists. His time in jail was rather cozy and gave him time to develop and write down more of his ideological underpinnings. And come up with a more comprehensive plan for taking over.

That's why I find it very worrisome when people like Donald Trump get what amounts to a slap on the wrist for staging an insurrection. Not just that but they actually put him on the ballot again 😱. And this time the people propping him up in the background came up with an elaborate plan for claiming the election and then completely restructuring the executive authoritarian style (aka Project 2025).

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 81 points 2 months ago

America made it clear it wants to be taken over by Nazis when it didn't have Trump's head on a pike outside the white house on January 7th.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

imprisoning him would've been fine too

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago

Yes. About 7 months after this article, he published "Mein Kampf" which he finished writing during his prison sentence.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 75 points 2 months ago

This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 61 points 2 months ago
[-] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago

It's nice to see some things haven't changed.

[-] jdr@lemmy.ml 44 points 2 months ago

Did any of you even check to see if it's real?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nyt-1924-hitler-tamed-by-prison/

(it is, but you didn't know that!)

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

No, because I am the original reporter, so I was there. Guess you feel pretty silly.

Also, turns out I underestimated Hitler. My bad on that one.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

just be more careful next time

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I just did Nazi it coming!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

I didn't check, but the time, dates, people and places were historically accurate. You're right that I didn't check if this newspaper clipping was real.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No, because I can't be bothered to fact check everything I read. It's why I appreciate it when people do it for me in comments. Thanks!

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

It's visually convincing (looks like a proper old-timey newspaper article, even has a misspelling/adapted name that nobody would use today), and OP even included the context with the source and date above the pic. I've seen the pic before, and if it were fake, nobody would manage/bother to add the original date it was published in.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Writing "neutral" op-ed and slice of life stories about Nazis is one of the Times's favorite things to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago

It takes a lot of mindlessness from the mindless masses to go from

reactionary extremist

to

Chancellor of the Third Reich

and the utter destruction of many countries. Which is where these right-wing tendencies stampede straight towards.

We can't even begin to fathom what Europe would look like today if republicans instead of Democrats were at the helm in Washington, as the Marshall Plan surely would NOT have happened.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Not sure whether you mean “mindless obliviousness” or “mindless rage” here, because I think reality was much closer to the latter. The Nazi party went from nothing to hundreds of thousands of members and 44% of the vote in parliamentary elections in less than a decade. They were extremely popular and their brand of ethno-nationalism resonated with a German public that was disillusioned by the humiliation they all felt (due to the treaty of Versailles) and the economic disaster of hyperinflation (deliberately created to pay down the old war debts as well as Versailles-imposed reparations).

Today most people think of Hitler as a devil single-handedly responsible for the Holocaust and all the invasions of neighbouring countries but that’s an oversimplification. There were tons of other nasty, ideological men in the Nazi party who would’ve done the same or worse had Hitler never existed. The conditions for a wildfire existed, Hitler just happened to be the spark which became ground zero of the blaze.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kn33@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

We need a fediverse equivalent of /r100yearago for this stuff

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

!100yearsago@sh.itjust.works & !100yearsago@lemmy.world

But both of them are dead now. They still have a lot of subscribers, so maybe someone could start posting to them again.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

I wrote the bot for one of them, I can restart it.

[-] pelley@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

Did Susan Collins write that article?

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Susan Collins: "Hitler's life was truly a rags-to-riches story. It just goes to show that you can do anything when you work hard enough."

[-] vaquedoso@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Well obviously his time in prison was the result of a political witchhunt orquestrated by the radical left /s

[-] ladicius@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

And his time in the Berlin bunker was the result of a witch-hunt organised by about half of the world.

[-] SteefLem@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

“….tamed by prison” yeah hehehe

[-] Draegur@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hitlers cannot be tamed.

They are ironically the only subject for whom the only solution is The Final one..

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Lock him up!

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Would they have been able to find that he wrote a racist manifesto in prison? It seems like there was evidence at the time that the headline is wrong.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

NYT: "Hitler won't invade the Soviet Union, even though he wrote that he considered Slavs to be untermensch and targeted them specifically as a bunch of Jew-loving communists. It would be an incredibly daft thing to do that would destroy his empire."

Hitler: Invades Soviet Union

NYT: Shocked pikachu face

[-] lugal@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

As a prison abolitionist, I am very sceptical about things like this. Sure, for this Hilter guy it worked and I'm glad it did, still on a whole, more people get radicalized than de-radicalized in prison.

Most prisoners are there for property crimes and the "bad guys" who really hurt people, aren't helped or bettered either. We aren't free until all of us are free. Don't let positive examples like this one cloud your judgment on an overall bad institution like the prison complex. Transformative justice is a much better solution, also for people like this.

[-] noxy@yiffit.net 11 points 2 months ago

pretty sure it didn't work for this guy

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

I look forward to following this story as it develops.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lugal@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

We will see

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Propaganda even in a democratic and liberal country exist then and still to this day. I just remembered that the character of Charles Foster Kane from "Citizen Kane" film, is himself a commentary on the power and influence that the media has on the minds of the people.

"People will think what I tell them to think!"

The quote is relevant then and just as relevant now.

That being said, I definitely notice from the conditioning on the public particularly when it comes to immigration and class issues. In my country, the far-right reared its ugly head. A lot of it has been fueled by resentment with competition with migrants from the lack of housing, as the result of decade long apprehension to building social housing and ideological austerity. However, the mainstream media shies away from outright mentioning the root cause. Social media and news outlets still relegate those who became attracted to the far-right as "fringe", "loud minority", "uneducated", "scumbags" or "riff raffs". Those terms have underlying classism and is thinly-veiled insult to the working class. But even if some folks try to acknowledge the real root cause, even they still stop short of clearly saying that housing shortage is the major problem but rather use the manicured phrase "those with genuine concerns". And politicians in my country tend to say that phrase rather than admitting "housing crisis is the root cause", because many politicians are landlords themselves.

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

jk rowling tamed by twitter

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

What's with that copyright? Was it everywhere at that time?

As seen in Snope's screenshot, other short stories follow the same formula: header, (c) by times, (author) for times, and then text. I suppose it's been done so you can't cut off these without leaving a text without a header. But how it helps anything? Or that's how everyone (used to) did it?

[-] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

It seems like "the new York times company" and "the new York times" are different entities, the "company" one seems to fill a role similar to Bloomberg or Reuters. Which makes it less strange for the Times contacting the Times by wireless.

Before 1989 copyright notices had to be in all works in the usa : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_notice And since different articles can have different sources, they probably gave each article a separate copyright notice.

[-] CptEnder@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Maybe it could be printed in another newspaper/in a different region? Can't tell if "reported over wireless" (radio/telegraph) means the reporter was sending the report from Berlin or if this report was being sent from NYC to wherever this paper was, if it was indeed not the NYT.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

@freezing cold takes

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
619 points (99.5% liked)

History

4270 readers
24 users here now

Welcome to History!

This community is dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.

Rules:

FOLLOW THE CODE OF CONDUCT

NOTE WELL: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban for a period of time determined by the moderator who bans you.

  1. Post about history. Ask a question about the past, share a link to an article about something historical, or talk about something related to history that interests you. Please encourage discussion whenever possible.

  2. No memes. No ads. No promos. No spam.

  3. No porn.

  4. We like facts and reliable sources here. Don't spread misinformation or try to change the historical record.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS