310
submitted 2 months ago by avidamoeba@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Just over half of interviewees (51%) in a Cultural Research Center at Arizona Christian University study, who identified as "people of faith," responded that they are likely to vote in the presidential election between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. The "people of faith" label is given to those who identify with a recognized religion, such as Christianity, Judaism, Mormonism or Islam.

The study found that approximately 104 million people under the "people of faith" umbrella are not expected to vote this election, including 41 million born-again Christians and 32 million who regularly go to church.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 128 points 2 months ago

Anecdotal, but there was considerable dissatisfaction and exhaustion with Trump amongst the religious in my hometown back in 2020. Most of them still supported and voted for him, but that any peeled off was novel. Not that they'd ever vote Dem, but simply not voting GOP in a presidential election was a big deal. It's not inconceivable that the number has increased since.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 81 points 2 months ago

Perhaps one or two could even be convinced to support the party that advocates for charity, kindness and goodwill to the poor. Responsible stewardship of gods creation. Openness to forgiveness and redemption for criminals. Treating your neighbors well. Just generally doing unto others as you would have them do unto you, even when you do not fully understand them.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 73 points 2 months ago
[-] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

No, let's stick to pulling ourselves up by our bootstraps the same way Jesus did: by having a powerful father.

[-] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

No that's communism, they'd say

[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

but abortion

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

They're fine with charity as long as they decide who is deserving of the money. They love government handouts as long as they are going to Christofascist pursuits. Just as Jesus taught us, I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 72 points 2 months ago
[-] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

If they get write-in ballots, maybe write "Jesus Christ."

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 44 points 2 months ago
[-] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Get out of here donagy

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

"Votes for Jesus go to the Republican."

  • Leslie Knope
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

“Christians” is doing some heavy lifting in this headline

[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Seriously, though. “Christians” includes anyone within the net of the Abrahamic religions? This is the widest cast of people possible makes everything said after the title insignificant.

What might be significant, though, is the Muslim population that is disappointed in Harris for not taking a harder stance against Israel, and has threatened not to vote at all.

Personally, I think it’s asinine to avoid a vote because the options are between someone who is not taking a hard line against Israel, and another who is on the record saying that Israel should “finish the job”, but then… I’m not a single-issue voter, so these things affect me differently.

[-] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 7 points 2 months ago

I'm not Muslim, but if my options were to vote for someone who wants to kill my family vs someone who won't stop selling weapons to those who are actively killing my family, I can understand why they wouldn't be super excited at those choices.

[-] Madrigal@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Not really, if you look at the history of Christianity, they’re right on brand. You’re just accustomed to an odd kind of “Christianity-lite” that manifested over the past century of so, mostly to keep the religion alive as it risked being left in the dust by social progress.

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 months ago

I skimmed the study itself but couldn't find how this compares to 2020 turnout of the same group. Just that it's "lower" and has a +/- of 4% margin.

[-] some_guy 22 points 2 months ago

Can they please not vote every year? A lot of them will be people who vote based on irrational ideas, so that'd be a win for reasonable people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nick@midwest.social 16 points 2 months ago

Works for me. Fuck em

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

It’s not enough to not to vote. It’s critical the we vote AGAINST any and all of these extremists. That’s the only way to begin bringing any sanity to our political dialogue.

[-] Countess425@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

We live in a two party system. Not voting for your guy is essentially a vote for the other guy. Especially when elections are this close.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Considering about 30% of the general population votes, this is pretty significant - 20% more christians will vote than Gen pop

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Yeah, don't count on it. Republicans always vote and they are always vote shitty.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

How did I miss this story?!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

It would be ironic if all they did was show up to overturn roe, and this election would have had them sit out the election, but then due to the abortion ammendments they were pushed back into voting.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago

Calling BULLSHIT. What part do they disagree when it comes to religion?

  1. Child sex - supported by religion.
  2. Rape - supported by religion.
  3. Killing the innocent - supported by religion.
  4. Controlling women - supported by religion.
  5. Anti LGBTQ+ - supported by religion.
  6. Hatred of other races - supported by religion.

So what is it that will make them change this time?

[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

You might also point out, for balance, that the opposites of those things can also be expected within religious frameworks.

With or without religion, it is people who purposefully carry out those actions while more often than not being aware they can be conceived of as harmful. You can try to take religion away from people, but don't expect hate to go with it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

That seems odd to me considering that antiabortion rules are on the line. I would think they'd be especially motivated to support Trump and get the Senate flipped Republican to keep a federal law from getting implemented to reverse the decision that government can force doctors to let you die if a fetus is the one killing you.

[-] Routhinator@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago

Trump told them they would never need to vote again after this election.

A bunch of them probably stopped listening after they heard what they want to hear and didn't hear the part after "again"

[-] Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 months ago

From my experience in my very red state, there's a high degree of cognitive dissonance when it comes to those things. A family friend who's very religious is secretly undergoing IVF even though the church banned it's use because they want a child more than the threat of excommunication. Supposedly they'll be forgiven for going against the church since they're "fundamentally good" people.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
310 points (96.1% liked)

News

23680 readers
4097 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS