459
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 133 points 2 months ago

there is absolutely nothing in florida that makes it worth living there

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 73 points 2 months ago

Florida is like an old used car: cheap upfront costs but expensive maintenance costs.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 months ago

Florida is like an old used car: cheap up front costs for a dangerous vehicle that you know will eventually fall apart but you act surprised when you lose a ball joint in your front suspension on the highway while doing 120 kph because you ignored your mechanic for the fourth time this year. The look on your face as your car crosses the median and you're about to impact a cement truck.

[-] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They do have a first-class spaceport... Watching a rocket takeoff from there would be the only reason I ever go to Florida.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 months ago

i went to see a launch in early 00's. it is interesting, maybe worth a trip, but not worth moving there

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Alligators tell me otherwise. In fact, they tell me they look forward to having it back to themselves soon.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] LaVacaMariposa@mander.xyz 73 points 2 months ago

Florida needs to stop rebuilding in the barrier islands. It's unfortunate for the people that live there, but this is going to keep happening over and over again.

Just plant mangroves and let them do their job of protecting the mainland.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

Stop building on the coasts in general. leave them as natural barriers and wonders, rather than having a 800 foot tall hotel 3 feet from the seawater.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 73 points 2 months ago

This is why insurance should be nationalized as part of your taxes.

Anyone thats not a brainwashed rightwing lunatic would see that paying 100-300 dollars a year on taxes would be a hell of a lot better than 100+ dollars a month just to buy a CEO a golden parachute and another yacht

But as long as right wing lunatics are out there literally hunting aid workers and evaluators, its never gonna happen.. because they want misery, pain, and destruction. its why Project 2025 wants to get rid of all of it.

[-] MSids@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago

I agree with nationalized healthcare insurance, but I don't know if I agree with using taxes to fund an underwriting account for houses in Florida that are guaranteed to get destroyed year after year.

Hurricanes are not getting smaller. Continuing to rebuild in Florida seems like building in the shadow of a smoking volcano.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

Insert Bugs Bunny sawing off Florida from the mainland

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] RBWells@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Even making it a state plan would work better in Florida than what we currently have. They let private insurers cherry pick the less risky houses, and cover whoever is left with the state plan. Then those private for profit insurers take the premiums, pay big bonuses to themselves, dissolve the company and leave, rinse and repeat. It's a scam.

[-] PlantJam@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The cherry picking is usually a compromise to keep the companies operating in the state at all. If the state says a company must offer coverage for all perils for the entire state or leave entirely, it doesn't take an underwriter to know Florida is a bad bet. There are similar carve outs for windstorm coverage in other gulf coast states, and I think for wildfire coverage on the west coast.

Edit: I couldn't find anything about a single peril state plan for California, but this article describes some of the recent insurance issues in the state: https://apnews.com/article/california-home-insurance-wildfire-risk-premiums-047bdfa514ce93dac83c82735a15554a

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] rekabis@lemmy.ca 72 points 2 months ago

Welcome to climate change. This is just the tip of the iceberg: things are just going to continue getting worse and worse each and every year.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 55 points 2 months ago

Anyone that rebuilds in place after their whole house is destroyed is nuts.. if you get insurance payout.. this is your chance to move.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 months ago

Insurance companies in the US have become a Ponzai scam instead of a service.

[-] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

is that a meme or did you accidentally butcher the term "ponzi scheme" which is something entirely different? not saying insurances aren't often a scam. just a different kind.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 2 months ago

Insurance companies save money by denying claims on a normal day. Paying to rebuild an entire state would jeopardize the big number going up and thus executive bonuses.

They won't be paying claims. They're not going to pay to rebuild a house that their models say will be knocked down again in 2-3 years by the next "storm of the century." Insurance companies exist to extract wealth, not to help people. And they will always have more lawyers than you.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 months ago

They also have all kinds of weasel options in their coverage. "Sorry, you were covered for wind, not flood" They'll avoid paying any way they can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 41 points 2 months ago

If your insurance only covers 50% of the property value it is essentially useless.

This is absolutely insane.

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Wait until you hear about the deductible... where I am (not earthquake country by any means) the deductible was $80k. I sad pass on that.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 7 points 2 months ago

My in-laws learned this the hard way after a total loss fire. Their insurance covered the current value of the house, not the cost to move/replace it in a total loss scenario, so now they have a big mortgage for their new house when the old one was nearly entirely paid off

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ravhall@discuss.online 35 points 2 months ago

I’m perfectly fine letting Florida handle Florida’s problems.

[-] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Someone should point out to most of the right wingers that FEMA is socialism

[-] Master@lemm.ee 31 points 2 months ago

Dont worry they voted unanimously to not expand fema right before both hurricanes.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 18 points 2 months ago

It’s only socialism when the libs get it. Otherwise it’s their god given right.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

They are already hunting FEMA folks.

[-] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Yup. Let the states decide, then pay for it

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

Insurance companies: "Wait you actually expect us to provide the service you're paying us for? That's not how this works!"

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago

I feel bad for the Tampa homeowner who discovered homes in their neighborhood used to be worth seven figures and are now worth low six figures.

I think we all predicted that kind of thing would happen somewhere someday, and Florida is one of those top places on the list, but even so, we should be sympathetic. You never really think this kind of thing is going to happen to you, after all. Best of luck to everyone whose homes were destroyed.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

I don’t. They dropped everything and moved across the country to a place with a known problematic housing market then gave the shocked picachu face when they couldn’t get back out. Remember that they dropped $550k cash. They are going to recover.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Someone who can afford a seven figure house is part of the 1% I'm not going to feel sorry about them losing a portion of their wealth that still keeps them above 95% of people.

[-] BlackAura@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Uhhhh.

https://www.google.com/search?q=what+percentage+of+homes+are+over+%241+million

Apparently per Redfin 8.5% of homes in the US are 7 figures or more. We're not talking the 1% here.

In California the median home price is almost $800,000.

I'm in a HCOL area in Washington State and regularly see 3bdrm and sometimes 2bdrm condos for over 1 million.

Not to mention sure your home is equity or net worth but most people only buy one and sell it anytime they move. Many of these people also planned on selling it / downsizing in retirement and converting it towards their retirement fund.

Remember that "afford" doesn't mean they have a million dollars. "afford" means they saved up a down-payment and then paid interest and mortgage payments (sometimes barely scraping by) for at least 30 years. Usually many more years if they moved from smaller house or a condo to a larger house when they decided to have a family (thereby starting a new mortgage for another 30 years). Or worst case, they haven't paid it off and now are underwater on their mortgage.

The banks are the ones making crazy money on all this.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

Who could have seen this coming?

[-] infinitevalence@discuss.online 25 points 2 months ago

If only climate scientists had warned us 50 years ago we probably could have done something.

load more comments (1 replies)

The insurance companies saw this coming. That's why they have the clauses that exclude flood damage.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

every client of the companies affected with see that cost

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
459 points (99.1% liked)

News

23618 readers
3621 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS