324
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 155 points 3 weeks ago

.......yeah, ok. Sounds good.

moves to California

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 weeks ago

I’ve got “Hotel California” and “San Francisco” battling it out in my head now.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Alteon@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

It'll never happen. US Military would never willingly split itself apart, let itself get split apart, or let another nation that it's not allied with have any sort of Army on its equivalent. The 50 states are here to stay.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago

Never say never. The domestic terrorists/agents of Putin are aching for an actual shooting civil war.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Even a peaceful division of the US would be something they would seriously benefit from. The US permanently divided against itself, each side easy to manipulate into a military conflict against the other. We would have nukes pointed at each other within a decade. It would be like the splitting of India and Pakistan, along with all the accompanying human rights atrocities.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 80 points 3 weeks ago

Don't threaten me with a good country.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

Can Canada take the coastal states?

Can Minnesota come along too? We're basically in Canada here already.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 70 points 3 weeks ago

Predictable. The donvict-humpers supposedly "win", and then get even MORE angry. Why so angry?

I suspect it's because for this brief period of time, anyway, it's hard for them to avoid just how HATED they and their precious golden donvict truly are. They thought they'd "win" and all the normal Americans around them would just disappear. And yet, Karens like Green continue to get confronted by normal people.

[-] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 51 points 3 weeks ago

The donvict-humpers supposedly “win”, and then get even MORE angry. Why so angry?

Because we've stolen their martyrdom from them by losing.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

This is outrageously anecdotal but the trumpers I know were all grins on the day after until they realized we weren’t gonna just get over this and they just labeled themselves. They seem pissy now, and one in my office in particular that used to chat with me about sports is really broken up I don’t want to anymore

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

They seem pissy now, and one in my office in particular that used to chat with me about sports is really broken up I don’t want to anymore

Yeah, the Professional Left did an entire section about this and they mentioned the case where some husband is completely gobsmacked that his wife filed for divorce.

But yeah, I've seen the same thing and heard about it from others. Lots of quiet interactions about how so and so is a big proponent of donvict; don't invite him/her to {whatever social function}.

The refrain of "yeah, but let's just agree to disagree" - I can see why many people, especially those most at risk thanks to what they wan, are thinking: "YEAH, FUCK THAT. You just voted to harm me, and you want to act like it's just a disagreement?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Denalduh@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

Why so angry? It's all they know..

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 70 points 3 weeks ago

that's not… usually what you do win you win. so like… honestly… okay, kick me out, let me be governed by a saner government. also DC is between two blue state so good luck evacuating back to your conservative safe space, dumbass

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 55 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Don't threaten me with a good time lady.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 47 points 3 weeks ago

I mean... as long as California takes Colorado and New Mexico with it, I see no real issues with that. We get the economy, the nature, and the nukes.

[-] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 3 weeks ago
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

We'll bring along Oregon and Washington, at least the west halves, and call the country the Collective of American States.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago

About the only thing that would make me happier than to have the entire pacific west coast secede and create a sovereign nation would be for Trump to do it for us so we don't have to fight a war over it. You want us gone? Please, show us the exit, we'll be on our way. No takebacksies.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] M600@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago

How is it not illegal for her to say these things? Like is that a threat against the United States?

[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago

A known traitor threat against the United States was allowed to run for and be elected president. This country doesn't have laws except for the poor and it certainly doesn't have a functioning system of justice or even government at this point.

[-] NeilBru@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Depends.

Protected by the first amendment, one can legally advocate for the dissolution of the Union ~~through bicameral ratification outlined constitutionally~~ by constitutional amendment. To advocate for armed insurrection or violent overthrow of the federal government is sedition and considered quite illegal.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Daze@sh.itjust.works 42 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aztechnology@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago

California would do so much better on its own I feel like

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago

5th largest economy on the planet by itself.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

Russia has a smaller economy. Go ahead. Make it without us. Dumb fucks.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] themadcodger@kbin.earth 41 points 3 weeks ago

Blue states pay more in taxes than they receive, and vice versa with red states. We are literally funding them dragging us all backwards.

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 38 points 3 weeks ago

So they know that Texas doesn't have a GDP high enough to even run all their red catastrophies, right? I'm kidding, I know they don't know. They probably also don't know that CA would be the third largest super power if they ever let us go. Which they won't. At all.

[-] Draces@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago

Californians are in an abusive relationship. Blamed for everything and not allowed to leave

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer 37 points 3 weeks ago

Oh no, please, don't

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

A republican flip flopping on states rights again? I'm shocked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Oh look, a broken clock.

How many times do we need to keep this nation "united" at gunpoint before we acknowledge that the science and reason people are incompatible with the supply side Jesus and racial hatred people? We can't stand one another, and time only deepens that division until bloodshed, over and over.

You can't educate those cultures that refuse to be educated or have their children educated. That kind of change, born of desperation and constant struggle inflicted from your own culture's values needs to come from within. The Red States need their Martin Luther "maybe we shouldn't punch ourselves in the face every day" reformation moment, and it isn't rational for those that see beyond their ignorance and superstition be dragged down with them for generations until they get there. Blue states propping them up only prolong comfort in their ignorance.

You can't force cultural evolution or save the willfully ignorant from their own willlfull ignorance from outside on Alabama any more than you can on Afghanistan, all you do is create a common enemy for them, as we continue to experience.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 34 points 3 weeks ago

Marjorie Taylor Dumbfuck here doesn't realize that her state, and in fact all Republican-led states, are solely dependent on blue state generosity in order to continue to exist. I'm sure the blue states would absolutely love for these freeloading welfare states to leave the union, because it would offer an immediate federal surplus that could be better allocated on themselves. It will never happen, because the smart conservatives love having a never-ending money faucet they can gargle when their economic plans fail due to their own ineptitude.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

If it weren't mainly a rural vs. urban split, I'd be all for the fascists getting their own country to ruin. But we're too spread out to make it feasible.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 30 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly, with what I'm genuinely concerned is going to happen, that would probably be preferable. Give everyone some notice, and we can escape the nutjobs by being homeless in California and New York instead of concentrated in camps in Florida and Georgia. I mean, it'll inevitably make the blue state nation more conservative as they blame southern refugees for all their problems, but it'd still be better more than likely

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, divorce yourself from all those states that send you money because you're too backward to care for yourself. Sounds like a great idea!

[-] Sinkbath@lemmy.today 28 points 3 weeks ago

There should be a bot that searches out MarjorieTG posts and auto-comments ”What a fucking idiot.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 weeks ago

[Wearing the US flag as a t-shirt and a pair of pajamas]: "I believe in the UNITED States of America!!!! ..... but I want a divorce"

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago

I'm literally moving to a blue state. The one good idea she had I beat her to it. Peace idiots.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 23 points 3 weeks ago

Greene on Monday described these actions as a threat against Trump's "mandate."

That mandate calls for actions Democratic states must accept, Greene argued, such as the mass deportation of "illegal invaders" and preventing trans children from playing sports.

The funny thing is that MTG is getting less and less of a "mandate" from GA-14 for all of her crap: In 2020 she got 74.6 percent of the vote, in 2022 she got 65.9, and in 2024 she got 64.4. Keep it up Marge.

[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago

Still way, way, way too high for a white supremacist goblin in human form to get.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MinusPi@pawb.social 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The rest of the US doesn't deserve California's economy

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Canada has given the world some of the worst extremists, racists, etc. (Proud Boys being one of the more recent horrible things we've exported)

There's a group that popped up during the convoy called diagolon. They posted this way back which seems like how things would work (a path from Russia to Florida)

They claim it's a joke, but isn't it always just a joke.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 23 points 3 weeks ago

Pretty sure BC, VA, and CO are not going along with that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Since the House and EC are capped, we should take the excess population that is not being represented and move it around.

[-] Clent@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

What's the split on ports in blue states vs red states?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

I'm sure the blue states won't have an issue losing the subsidies-dependent red states. I wonder where flyover country wants to get the money from to keep up their lifestyle.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

I'm hoping Cascadia finally gets realized. I want to uninvite Idaho, though.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
324 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19194 readers
2120 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS