814
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 135 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The French deserve some respect. If you want to know what a true strike or protest looks like, look to the French.

[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 87 points 1 month ago

More and more these days French disrespect feels like boomer shit. Look what the French did when the government came for their pensions. The industrial action within the transport sector alone.

I was visiting Paris during some of the aforementioned protest. They’re out and about (in numbers) and will gladly get out to protest when they feel it necessary. Plenty of other western countries could learn, a lot, from the French people.

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago

I keep saying this and people look at me like I'm some kind of extremist

Like no dude I just want universal healthcare

[-] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 month ago

universal healthcare

*me, looking at you like you're some sort of communist

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 18 points 1 month ago

The American right would like to categorize it like that but it's not communism at all, it's socialism. I wish they could mischaracterize the correct political philosophy.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I remember when Obama promised us that. Good times.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 20 points 1 month ago

Look what the French did when the government came for their pensions.

For the record we did get it down from 65 to 64, but we still got +2 years.

[-] CTDummy@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I appreciate that the outcome may not have been what was strictly desired. The French populace still get off their arse and do more than complain on social media while effectively doing three fifths of fuck all. More than what can be said about some others, especially those who are inclined to make brain devoid white flag jokes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Even today, they just don't give a fuck about rules.

In Southern France there are speed cameras being set up everywhere, and they'll catch you for being even a few km's over. The locals (mostly rural) have responded by either torching them, encasing them in hay bales, painting over them, or chopping them down. The police keep putting them up, alongside cameras to watch the cameras, and the locals keep destroying them overnight.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago

The important thing is to burn lots of people's cars. Probably locals who are also protesting.

That's how you really get the attention of the authorities.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cmder@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So yeah why does the american/english don't do more research about origins and call everything french ?

[-] Pips 8 points 1 month ago

It's because deep frying was not very common in the U.S. Immersion in hot fat was considered a French style of cooking, so they're French style fried potatoes. I think "fries" instead of "frieds" is dialect that caught on nationally in the U.S. in the 70s.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago

Yeah, it never occurred to anyone ever to stick their tongues in each others mouths until it was documented in ancient India.

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 31 points 1 month ago

Anon didn't say that it started in ancient India, just that the fact that it happened in ancient India proves that it didn't start in France

[-] shawn1122@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We generally attribute discoveries to whoever documented it first. It's almost laughable to attribute it to the French based on a kissing style that was widespread there in 1923. Surely people were doing it before then. Yet, the Americans and British found it so unique they referred to it as French kissing.

Perhaps it was common before ancient India, but then the question is, why didn't the ancient Babylonians, Egyptians, Chinese, Romans, and Greek document on it then?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 44 points 1 month ago

Just have to triple check whether French revolution occured in French.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Which gives rise to the true founding father of Germany. Napoleon.

Without his restructuring of the HRE for management it would be even harder to unify later.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] oce@jlai.lu 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nobody in France calls French fries or French toast "French". We're definitely happy to attribute the fries to our Belgian friends and nobody thinks something as ubiquitous as toasts could have a single inventor. I think those are Anglo-Saxon cultural elements.

[-] olosta@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

No we are not attributing fries to the Belgian, fries are french. The Belgian improved on our invention and make the best fries, but Frenchs invented it.

Content warning, a lot of french: https://www.musee-gourmandise.be/fr/musee-gourmandise/articles-de-fond?view=article&id=132:la-veritable-histoire-de-la-frite&catid=77:articles-fond

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Also here we call it "cafetière à piston" not french press.

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago

No idea what a French press is. Probably a cafetière ?

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 month ago
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

FIY: French toast is the english name for pain perdu.

Also probably not "invented" by the French, but no one thinks they invented simple toast.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

Britain is the land mass that includes England, Wales, and Scotland.

William the Conquerer was the first Norman king of England and never had power over Wales and he was mostly successful in gaining homage from King Malcolm III, but never king over the lands.

Edward I about two hundred years later almost pulls it off, but doesn't quite get a firm grip on Scotland. James I in the early 17th century holds the crown for each of the lands. In 1707 they formalize the relationship with a treaty.

So... No the French did not found Britain.

[-] Im_old@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Also Normans were descendants of viking settlers. So French didn't technically fund England either (yes, I'm being pedantic for the sake of the joke).

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

> Britain was founded by the French

[-] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago

Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon? The son of an Irish immigrant? He’s not the kind of guy who’d let facts get in the way of an opinion so we’re probably pretty solid saying that in front of him. If he did run his mouth, then I got your back, blud.

[-] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 26 points 1 month ago

Belgium is kinda France tbh

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

The first step is admitting it

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago
[-] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It's almost like national borders are fake and peoples just blend into each other

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

To save anyone else the wiki trip

“Some authors consider the recipe for Aliter Dulcia (translated as 'Another sweet dish') included in the Apicius, a 1st-century CE Ancient Roman cuisine cookbook, "not very different" from modern French toast, although it does not involve eggs.[10][11]

In Le Viandier, culinary cookbook written around 1300, the French chef Guillaume Taillevent presented a recipe for tostées dorées[12] involving eggs and sugar.[13]”

[-] superkret@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago

When a dish with 3 ingredients is missing one ingredient, it's not the same dish.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JayObey711@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

"France" comes from the "franks" who were considered Germans originally

[-] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Germanic people*

Germans as an ethnicity did not exist back then yet.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 12 points 1 month ago

This is not the French claiming ownership of stuff, this is shitty naming on the part of Americans who thinks all european food is from France. Or who really wouldn't know the difference between Europe and France to begin with.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The most elegant and refined food, fries.

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 10 points 1 month ago

The French invented sex. Before then people would just sort of split into two small people who’d then have to grow back to full size, and it was very boring and not very je ne c’est sais quoi.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 1 month ago

"We invented democracy, existentialism, and the ménage à trois."

"Oh man... Those are three pretty good things."

[-] swordfish@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago

Democracy? Explain please, i thought the concept was way older than France.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 1 month ago

I'm just quoting Talladega Nights.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] modeler@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, technically the French did not found Britain - they were Normans.

Who were the Normans? They were Scandinavian vikings who had been raiding France for decades. Eventually the French king decided to offer them lands (now called Normandy) in France if they promised to stop raiding and instead protect the French coast.

[-] Ethalis@jlai.lu 6 points 1 month ago

Meh, this is largely a debate over semantics since the mere notion of a "French people" wouldn't have made sense at the time. "Frenchness" isn't an ethnicity, it's a mix of many different peoples that mixed and intertwined over the years (celts, romans, germanic tribes, immigrants from all over Europe...) and that eventually were all brought together as subjects of the french kingdom.

Normans weren't "french" in the modern sense of the word, but then again very few people in what would later become modern France would have at that time : they all would have considered themselves "Provençal", or "Breton", or "Lorrain" who just happened to live in a Duchy that swore fealty to the king of France.

All things considered, William the Conqueror was a lord of the french kingdom, swore fealty to the king of France and spoke French, so he was no less (but no more, granted) French than any other of his peers. Whether you want to call him french is up to you but is largely an anachronism

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
814 points (98.9% liked)

Greentext

4636 readers
1591 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS