this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
1050 points (99.6% liked)

World News

43967 readers
3155 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Portuguese Air Force is no longer expected to acquire the 5th generation F-35 fighter from Lockheed Martin, all due to the review of the US position towards NATO.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Stuff like this might actually be what unravels the Trump administration. The military industrial complex is far more powerful than any of the people Orange Julius has surrounded himself with, and they will not like taking losses to appease his ego.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Donald Trump is not suicidal!

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

It might unravel America, which would have much longer lasting consequences.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Bravo to Portugal!!! Setting a solid example of what the rest of 1st Class Europe should do with US weapon contracts. The current US political situation is playing a dangerous game with the US MIC.

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Have to be honest I'm not keen on the UK buying any more either I'd rather see Rafales on the new carriers or a tweaked eurofighter.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Euro fighter with vectoring engines, and better stealth would be doooope

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 177 points 2 days ago (11 children)

hey guys, I think that trump guy might just be really awful for America.

[–] b0s@lemm.ee 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Got to speed up the European 6th gen fighter development

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 7 points 2 days ago (12 children)

That's how we get shitty aircraft. Need to speed up developing homebrew avionics for the F35s.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Asking stupid question... Isn't this kinda shit that got Kennedy killed? Fucking w the military industrial complex? Have those barons diversified enough to not care about this line of business or something? I thought this was kind of a backbone of our economy. So many jobs too.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Killing Donny wouldn't change much, tho.
America has shown it wants Donald or a Donald substitute.

Project 2025 is now Americas playbook.

Other countries changing military suppliers isn't going to change back to america for 10-15 years (hell, maybe even longer, I dunno what the service life of a jet platform is).
The risk that has surfaced of "America has an off switch" - even just the potential risk of rumors of an off switch - means all those military assets are useless when America elects unhinged leaders that are willing to subvert democratic process in order to run their playbook.
And America has shown it is willing to do that. Even prefers to do that

[–] VoodooAcupuncture@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even if they don't have an "off switch" they can just not update the software. Those jets require constant updates and without it the radars don't work right and the stealth degrades.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rippersnapper@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Donald has Hitler levels of luck in that regard.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lootboblin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

When Finland chose their new 64 F-35s. I supported it. Not anymore. We should have chosen our west neighbour’s Saabs.

[–] muddyuk@lemm.ee 49 points 2 days ago

Why would anybody feel they can rely on American hardware anymore? Any country with any sense won’t be beholden to them as an ally now thanks to that idiotic mango.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago

They went to the fighter store and all the F-35s were turned upside down.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 79 points 2 days ago (11 children)

If we assume that Portugal would have ordered the same number as Czechia (a fellow European country with a pretty close GDP, population, and military budget that already bought F-35s) and take the flyaway cost on wikipedia of $82.500,000 as the price Portugal would have paid per plane, that's $2 billion in sales that Lockheed Martin doesn't get

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago (2 children)

that's $2 billion in sales that Lockheed Martin doesn't get

And that's just the beginning.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I feel like billionaires might resolve the Trump/musk issue for us. Fucking with a defense contractor's bottom line is pretty dangerous, especially when you have private security (Musk)

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I feel like billionaires might resolve the Trump/musk issue for us. Fucking with a defense contractor’s bottom line is pretty dangerous, especially when you have private security (Musk)

Honestly, I feel it's more likely to display how much the defense industry is just another ordinary industry. They'll whinge and wring their hands, maybe openly support the limpdick opposition if they're feeling particularly pressured, but all that experience in making killing machines is just engineering and marketing. They're not more likely to have clout or death squads (of their own, at least) than other major industries of comparable size and importance, and everything is structured in such a compartmentalized way that they couldn't really leverage that against the government if they actually wanted to throw down.

The defense industry is more like the oil industry than a cyberpunk future. Influential, not independent.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Portugal would probably have bought more, since we have a large area of the Atlantic Ocean that needs to be patrolled not only by sea, but also by air.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Dunno if you'll find a more European fighter than the Gripen.

[–] Denixen@feddit.nu 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Uses a license produced engine from US (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volvo_RM12), which has caused endless problems in exports for SAAB, since the US blocks them frequently when they are about to win a contract.

I would go for Rafale or Eurofighter and I am saying this as a swede. We need to replace the engines ASAP. Perhaps a UK, German or French one. Would probably take years to develop thought and likely a significant overhaul will be necessary.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well, an easier fix is to just keep using the engine design, and stop paying the license fees.

What is the US gonna do? Stop supporting NATO? Put tariffs on exports to the EU? Stop being an ally, and ally themselves with Russia?

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Use stolen military technology as a casus-belli maybe?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] turtl@lemm.ee 82 points 2 days ago

Love to see it

[–] Mee@reddthat.com 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mmm.. Pretty interesting article.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 15 points 2 days ago

Thank fucking god

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 71 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It's migration season, and this is only the first bird - I predict there's more of them.

I think we have an interesting conflict of interest on the US side of the ocean: "the US military industrial complex" vs. "Trump, driving away their customers".

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago

US MIC: "I wish the Feds would buy more guns and less butter."

*monkey paw curls*

load more comments (1 replies)

Yeah I got a sneaking suspicion that LMC’s gonna see a ton of options getting dropped and orders cancelled. Our government is not to be trusted. We’ll use that shit as leverage at some point.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 49 points 2 days ago

Portugal was lucky to get quite late aboard the F35 ship, as they decided about it as late as April 2024. Finland, where I'm from, was one of the earliest ones, deciding about the procurement in late 2022. Some other ones, as told by Wikipedia:

Canada: Jan 2023 Czechia: Jan 2024 Germany: 2023 Greece: Delivery 2027, so ordered probably in late 2023 or so? Poland: 2020, apparently some already delivered? Romania: November 2024 Singapore: Early 2024 Switzerland: delivery from 2027, so probably ordered in late 2023?

The further the procurement process, the more money might get wasted if the order has to be cancelled. Would still make sense to cancel, though, because a weapon you are free to use as long as there is no war is just a heap of scrap metal. It does not matter how much money we've already spent on the scrap metal, we should not put a cent more.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

O mundo já mudou. Houve eleições nos EUA, houve uma posição em relação à NATO e ao mundo, afirmada pelo secretário para a Defesa e pelo próprio Presidente dos EUA, que tem que ser tida em conta também na Europa e no que tem a ver com Portugal.

E esse nosso aliado, que ao longo de décadas foi sempre previsível, poderá trazer limitações na utilização, na manutenção, nos componentes, em tudo aquilo que tem a ver com a garantia de que as aeronaves serão operacionais e serão utilizadas em todo o tipo de cenários.

Interview here, in Portuguese.

The world has already changed. There were elections in the USA, there was a position [change] regarding NATO and the world, stated by both the Defense Secretary and the President of the USA, that has to be taken into account in Europe and in Portugal.

Our ally, who through decades has always been predictable [as in steadfast], may bring limitations to using, to maintaining, to components, anything that relates to the assurance that the planes are operational and can be used in all types of scenarios.

For some context, Portugal has an aging fleet of F-16s. The national Air Force wants to replace these with F-35s, but that is no longer likely to happen.

He was asked if Portugal would instead purchase, for example, French aircraft, but he declined to answer.

load more comments