this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
110 points (99.1% liked)

Canada

9641 readers
757 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There’s a broader strategy at work here, too. By letting his opponents expose the smallness of their politics, Carney’s will start to look bigger by comparison. This might not satisfy the Liberal partisans in his midst, although after he saved their party from political oblivion they almost certainly won’t push back very hard. But it will look good to the sort of middle of road Canadians he’ll need to win the next election, whenever it comes — the ones who largely abandoned the party near the end of Trudeau’s leadership.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] funkajunk@lemm.ee 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Carney keeps showing that he doesn't want to do things from a party first mindset. He's 100% Team Canada, and I'm here for it.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 49 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is 50% why I voted for him, the other 50% was he just has the skills and pedigree that none of our other leaders were boasting.

I feel like donating to his campaign was some of the best money I've spent.

[–] Dearche@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago

For me the second 50% was so that we get a leader that wasn't calling specifically to erode Canadian rights and services while giving billions in handouts to the rich.

Frankly, while it's early on, it is impressive how Carney really is focusing on Canada first over parties or personal interest. Even if I don't agree with many of his views of how to fix the country, so far he's shown to have integrity and the right heart, and that's enough for me to respect him, something I don't do for PP or Singh.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago

Agreed. What I want is someone who can run our country, both domestically and internationally. I’m fed up with people who are good at politics.

Of course, I also want electoral reform and serious workable strategies to combat wealth inequality. I have my doubts that he’ll make any progress on those fronts.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He will probably try to find a way to grant the NDP official party status, even though they came well short of earning it in the election. And he might yet make some changes that give parliamentarians — including the ones on the opposition benches — the ability to question witnesses, propose legislation, and otherwise better interrogate the issues of the day and the government’s handling of them.

I know we're in the honeymoon period of new leadership, but there's no evidence for any of this. Fawcett is just projecting what he'd like Carney to do and this article is mostly just gushing over our new PM rather than an attempt at ensuring that we're supplied with any factual information. I expected better from the Observer.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

factual information on the plans of our 1 week old government?

Maybe give it a couple more weeks before demanding such a thing

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Um, no. The job of a journalist is to report facts, or at the very least conjecture based on evidence. The claims above are presented without either.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Precisely... how do you want facts on short and mid term plans for a government that is 1 week old?

What you are asking is for speculation which is not great for the journalists nor the public.

The article above is, to boot, an opinion piece so you are asking the horse to bark like a dog and saying it's a bad dog when it cannot comply

[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Carney is a breath of fresh air in Federal politics, didn't vote for them, but I approve of him as Prime Minister.

Harper made Canada a laughing stock internationally, Trudeau saved our image only to prove too vapid and gain us a rep for big talk and no action.

PP loves to talk about the "lost Liberal decade" but frankly I see 20 wasted under PM's that were little more than heavily polished caricatures of people; more interested covering up their mistakes than fixing real problems.

Carney seems like a real person, and one with relevant qualifications, who acts like an adult and wants to fix problems.

Or this is an "Obama" moment for Canada, a last impotent chance for change before the flood of misinformation fractures our institutions irrevocably 🤷

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Harper made Canada a laughing stock internationally

Made? Continues to make us a laughing stock. He runs the global conservative effort to get right wing governments into power.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Democracy_Union

It reads like something out of a conspiracy theorists' idea of what a new global order would start as.

[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

I agree, I was just being polite. Harper is the worst.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I hadn't listened to him be interviewed before until yesterday, and I was pleased to hear that he's quick on his feet and confident and sounds very knowledgeable. My ex said about him that nobody wants a policy wonk for PM, but so far it works.