this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
468 points (86.4% liked)

Uplifting News

14967 readers
436 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] polyamorypagan69@lemm.ee 42 points 1 day ago
[–] storm@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago

Can we quit running billionaire's PR campaigns for them? These people are not our friends, and giving back a portion of what they stole (always in the most public way) doesn't change that

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To his kids and their charities? Reminder that Bill gates is every bit as exploitative and evil, he didn’t become a billionaire by paying fair wages. This is all PR to try and save his reputation as everyone turns on billionaires. Like buffet, he just shuffles his money to his kids and calls it charity

[–] BreadAndThread@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Ikr fuck this guy.

[–] chemicalprophet@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 day ago

To his charity? Oh Bill, you shouldn’t have. Go fucking die billionaire scum…

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 2 points 18 hours ago

Cool, give me some you weird old cuck.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't give it away.

If you really want to help people, buy media, buy politicans and get REAL change that will actually last.

You giving money to random charities does fuck all, except give you tax breaks.

We need change in the political system so that we don't need fucking charities for basic needs.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry Bill but it’s too late and not enough. I still want to eat the rich and that includes you.

Although I‘ll admit if all billionaires did this instead of - oh you know - investing in fascism and actively dismembering democracy globally I might feel different about this. But as things stand I am done with billionaires. We cannot coexist. Simple as that.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Isn't he literally the only billionaire who has been donating a lot over the years?

But yes, fully agree. There's no reason any person should be that rich. They're cause and symptom of a fucked-up system

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How did he get to be a billionaire? By standing on the throats of others, he could not have created that wealth without harm.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think a big problem with our financial system is people with wealth have the ability to siphon wealth out of companies through the stock market. Ultimately that company is paying shareholders with profit generated by the workers. A billion invested with just 5% dividends would take many lifetimes of constant work for an individual to pay off a single time, let alone every year. Yet that's how it is. Billionaires get richer and richer and their blood sucking proboscis gets bigger and bigger.

We live in a financially feudal society where the Lord's have no responsibility to tend to the land.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Absolutely not. I think others give a bit less, but they’re just not public about it.

Warren Buffet makes $5B annual donations to charities. He’s an investor, so if he gave it all out as a lump sum, he wouldn’t be able to make more to donate next year (and aside total received, many charities work better with consistent yearly funding)

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

McKenzie Scott (Bezos Ex-Wife) is doing what she can to get the divorce money to where it normally doesn't land, so if we eat the rich, i'd currently say she's off limits, pending good behavior.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 1 points 20 hours ago

Dinner sentence with reprieve.

[–] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Still leaves him with just over $1 billion, enough for his great great grandchildren to live comfortably forever. Don’t be fooled, this is about tax breaks, not charity. Once you have over a billion in wealth, you’ve won the game of life. There’s nothing you can’t buy, there’s nothing you can do.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 5 points 20 hours ago

Don’t be fooled, this is about tax breaks, not charity.

And don't forget, this is about laundering reputation. Hence the whole "in 20 years" crap.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Truly a financial genius to give up 99% of his wealth for tax breaks...

I figure he donates to his own charity and still has a lot of control over the money either way.

I wonder what thatd look like on his taxes.

[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Once you have over a billion in wealth, you’ve won the game of life.

More like the game of 100 lives. I'm using $10m as a gross estimation for what a person living comfortably needs to spend throughout their whole life. Sure it varies by country and other factors, but this amount should more than cover a lifestyle in which you literally don't need to worry about a thing. No need for sketchy investments either: just stuff it in a deposit and you could live off the interest alone, but that's assuming you have all the money at once.

Is it really about tax breaks, when the US doesn't have a wealth tax? Would it prevent his children from dealing with inheritance tax?

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My tired brain read "99 cent" at first and I thought it was an article by The Onion.

[–] cepelinas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

It seems you aren't the only one.

[–] whome@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Using all his money and influence to advocate taxing the super rich significantly would be helpful.

[–] Robbity@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

He does actually. https://observer.com/2024/09/bill-gates-bernie-sanders-tax-wealthy/

He and warren are some of the smarter billionaires, they realize having infinite money is not actually very useful.

Not to say there's any thing good about there being billionaires in the first place, but there is a spectrum.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] excral@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While it's good that he's willing to give away 99%, he'd still be a billionaire and one of the richest persons of the world afterwards. He's so incomprehensibly rich that even 1% of his wealth is more than any single person should own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago

I'll give him credit for it when it fucking happens

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Bill Gates deserves a lot of shit for creating the original big tech monopoly. But I'll say this about him: At least he's not hoarding his money to build a secretive compound to hold hundreds of kids he spawned with right wing crazy women for the purpose of creating a future master race.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 14 points 1 day ago

Though it’s better than hoarding, a billionaire can’t even give away their money without wielding a dangerous amount of influence on all of our lives.

[–] polysexualstick@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bill Gates is 69. By 2045 he's going to be 89. What's he going to do with all that money at 89 anyways, after he kept it all his life.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These people usually give it to their children to establish modern nobility.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 64 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Bullshit, he's "transferring" his wealth to his own charity for tax reasons...

It's a trick to protect his money for his children.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›