this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
243 points (95.8% liked)

News

29497 readers
3710 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SparroHawc@lemm.ee 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh hey, yet another article perpetuating the narrative that Luigi is guilty. Must be a day of the week that ends in 'y'.

[–] Lembot_0002@lemm.ee 149 points 4 days ago (2 children)

and test-fired it.

Nice. What CEO did you choose?

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 79 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It was a test shot, they probably just found a landlord or something.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is wasteful. There are a lot of corrupt politicians out there.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Perfect is the enemy of the good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 7 points 3 days ago
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 21 points 4 days ago (5 children)

That brings up an interesting point. If I manufacture and sell a gun as "the CEO annihilator", would it be legal? If not, why?

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (12 children)

I'm not a lawyer, but you'd need a #7(?) FFL, and serialized and register the gun before selling it, if I'm not mistaken. Keeping it for yourself is the only legal way to do it without a paper trail. Also, some states have banned even that.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Probably legal, but not practical. Suppliers would probably start refusing to work with you. Payment systems too.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Suppliers don't ask what you're using the filament for. Let's say they did though.

Thanks to America's legal system, you can use shell companies to move filament around to separate the supplier from the actual intended use.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] subterfuge@lemmy.world 146 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Alleged Ghost Gun” FTFY

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 10 points 3 days ago

Wonder how long that cop had it laying around?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 67 points 4 days ago

I don't even know if they are alleging it anymore. The chain of custody is entirely fucked, and the fact that it even leaked is going to make it hard to include at trial.

[–] tio_bira@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If it's so legal, why we don't have the stl for it ?

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 9 points 3 days ago

We do. There are Glock frame stls everywhere. I didn't look into this as I've fallen out of the print shoot repeat community cause of arthritis keeping me from enjoying it. But there are no less than a hundred files luigi could have gotten from a certain "odd to see" website.

[–] ssroxnak@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Making your own firearms has always been legal in America. And it's not exactly easy. Even 3D printed guns take a lot of work.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Strictly speaking, if you want a reliable firearm you are much better off getting one made out of steel than composite plastics.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Most 3D printed guns use commercially available parts for the pressure bearing components.

A 3D printed Glock uses a slide and barrel bought from Glock. The only 3D printed part is the frame, which is the only part that has to be serialized.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I did a p80 build and would consider it more reliable than anything made in layers, and it is still collecting non existent dust in a safe cause of its issues. But Glocks are considered the gold standard of reliability and they are plastic lowers.

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 77 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You mean the gun planted in his backpack?

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Hypothetically:

If he did it. And if he stashed the gun. And then the cops planted a gun. Could he recount the events on the stand and reveal he stashed the gun, thus proving the cops are attempting to frame him?

This is nonsense. But, hypothetically…

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Bad move. Your right to remain silent doesn't mean you get to pick and choose which questions you answer on the stand should you choose to testify. Instead he could give plenty of information to his lawyer who could then rabidly attack the planted gun and prove malfeasance.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your Miranda rights and your 5th amendment rights are different

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

... in reference to the right to remain silent, that's wrong. Miranda rights don't cover double jeopardy so technically they aren't exactly the same. But effectively they are.

[–] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

if your lawyer tells you to stfu, you stfu. the lawyer is better at lawyering than you 👍

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If the judge tells you that your "right to stfu" doesn't apply in this situation and that you must legally answer the question, then you either answer the question or get held in contempt until you do. And that CAN be held against you.

[–] Tire@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

The court is capable of calling out more than one person. It could send him to prison for the original crime and also charge the police with a separate crime of trying to frame him.

load more comments (1 replies)

Excellent work, 47!

[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

I wonder why they don't work so well. Maybe I don't understand how they operate but it seems like if the frame is in the correct precise shape it should work like a regular Glock.

Probably better for everyone that they don't work like the real thing.

In The Philippines there is a thriving underground industry making illegal pistols from scratch. Last I heard the 1911 was the favorite, here's a newer video from 2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ok43dZAVdQM

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Objects are more than their shape

If you made a Glock out of frozen custard, would you expect it to perform the same as the real deal?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's the suppressor. Since most semi-auto pistols relies on the recoil from firing to cycle, adding a suppressor can mess up the cycling without a Nielsen device.

There are plenty of examples of unsuppressed pistols with 3d printed frames working just fine on yt

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Of fucking course Hiram Maxim invented that shit.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Seconded, this is the best explanation here. The browning action, on which most semi automatic pistol operate on, does not function well when a suppressor is added w/ out a Nielson device or 'booster'.

The design is made assuming the barrel weighs ____ oz, if suddenly it weighs more then the reliability is impaired.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Hand machining precision parts to construct working firearms that are so identical to the originals that official parts or attachments would be interchangable... This is like a dream job for me. If I could stand living in the tropics, maybe I'd move to the Philippines...

Speaking of the tropics, in that video the workshop is exposed to the humid tropical air. I wonder how they deal with rust on their tools and swelling in the wooden tool handles.

At any rate, I say keep it up. Keep doing fine artisan work while simultaneously sticking to the man and earning a living. Very impressive.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

3d printed material has a lower tensile strength than injection molded or stamped materials. Most prints are weakest between the layers, and it's not always immediately obvious where the weakened points are. Even the parts that don't get hot or explode are moving and rubbing against other parts.

Gun parts are subjected to rigorous testing and grading. Not only do they know roughly how many uses before a part will break, but also what to look for on a worn or breaking part.

3d printed guns, you never know which bullet will be the last.

[–] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (5 children)

if the frame is in the correct precise shape

3D printing isn’t meant for production-level accuracy. It’s a prototyping technology that is good enough for a lot of different applications, but not when sub-millimeter precision is necessary.

Can you make something that works? Of course! Will it work as reliably as something made using better processes? Usually not.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›