this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
405 points (99.5% liked)

Funny

14195 readers
1358 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gigastasio@sh.itjust.works 56 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

...is your taxonomic nomenclature.

[–] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Data you are supposed to be observing the behavior of 21st century humans, not interacting with them. You are in danger of violating the temporary prime directive. We don't want another Sarjenka incident.

[–] altasshet@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

That's my cat's name...

[–] BootLoop@sh.itjust.works 46 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Perhaps it's cumulative. 200lbs worth of cats total.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 months ago

That’s a lot of cats.

[–] wischi@programming.dev 15 points 3 months ago

The last line says 2 pets max. So two small Snow Leopards maybe?

[–] SonicBlue03@sh.itjust.works 38 points 3 months ago

Do you know if they actually check? My leopard has let himself go a bit and may not be typical.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 3 months ago

If I let my Leopard eat the landlord's face I won't pay any rent. Sounds good.

$35 a month pet rent...

Fuck the capitalistic system, may the landlord's all die.

[–] Maiq@piefed.social 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Happy 185LB Khajiit noises!

[–] Maiq@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

This one weighs 83.914 kilos though.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 10 points 3 months ago

It costs 400,000 treats to feed this cat… for 12 seconds.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 months ago

Do you have the address been looking for somewhere to rent that i can keep me Leopard?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So a small female leopard would be allowed?

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago

Two leopards, there’s a two pet limit!

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

If you pay the $250 deposit and $35/month pet rent. 👍

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Monthly pet rent?! Is this a pet sitter?

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

they would charge per occupant if it wasn't for those regressive pro child birthing laws

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 5 points 3 months ago

I would assume it's rent and that's why there is a 2 pet limit. Kind of insane.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't think ita unreasonable to do so, but it should not be in addition to the deposit. Should be one or the other.

Like, over time it's more likely for damage from pets to build up and can easily get over $250 after a year or two.

But good luck getting over $250 damage in 2-3 months.

So I would see it reasonable to charge per month per pet, in the assumption that there will be damages to fix building up over time.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

deposit is the only acceptable thing here… rent? no way! you don’t pay rent per person in the house. the landlord is losing nothing per month for your pet

the potential damages come from the additional deposit/bond

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So a pet should have a deposit or added rent but not a child? Or a second tenant? Is none of this the point of an overall damage deposit

Slippery fuckin slope.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

landlord can't legally charge more for children

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

Hmm I wonder why, maybe because they tried and people were sensible enough to push back.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What if my tiger is still a baby? 🤔

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's fine, but once it's past the limit, do NOT attempt to flush it away. It will be very mad at you for turning it into a wet claw tornado.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Seems reasonable

[–] PK2@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

The extra fees may sound unfair, but as long as my baby can scout her own food it all balances out.

[–] arrakeen_urbanite@feddit.online 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Should have specified Felis catus

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Well, it said "Cat Cat".

People should turn the autotranslator down. And stop messing with word capitalization!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

If you can get a tiger through the door, I don't think anyone is going to argue with it.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 2 points 3 months ago