this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
206 points (96.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

41059 readers
825 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I think European Union is weird with some accents. It sounds almost like "Europinyinyinyin"

[–] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I am not sober. I just had far too much fun saying "europinyinyinyin" out loud over and over again, so thank you for that. :)

I think I have some extended family who probably say it similarly to that, too. Probably the ones from the deep south.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I'm happy you like it, it's been stuck in my brain for months and I still think it's a bit funny.

[–] remon@ani.social 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I'm glad to see someone's made this because it's been bouncing around in my head for ages but I've never got around to putting it together and letting it out.

[–] jaycifer@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

That’s just, like, Europinyin, Man.

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

All right, all right, don't hurt yourself!

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago

Now that's a shower thought I like!

It did, didn't it?

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Or this monster:

James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_while_John_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_a_better_effect_on_the_teacher

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The fact that that sentence can even be considered in any way correct is a fucking travesty

[–] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would argue that, without the punctuation, it's not technically correct. The references to James and John saying "had had," at least, should be in quotes. Additionally, unless broken up with a semicolon or a period before the final four "hads," it's a run-on sentence.

If you change the "hads" that mean provided/said in the context of the sentence (excluding the quoted ones), you could write it as:

James, while John had [said] "had", had [said] "had had"; "had had" had [provided] a better effect on the teacher.

And though it doesn't flow right to me to have James and his action verb split by a phrase about John, I'm not sure that's incorrect. Phrasing it to fix the flow, for me, would be:

While John had [said] "had", James had [said] "had had"; "had had" had [provided] a better effect on the teacher.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I guess. But to me the most baffling thing is such a sentence can even be constructed. Even disregarding the missing punctuation. I don't think I could even get close to this in my native language. Maybe 2 or 3 worda at most and even then probably not.

[–] isyasad@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

The fact that five of the "hads" are not semantically the word "had" but rather a quotation makes this one weaker than "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" imo, though you could argue that Buffalo as a proper noun is also kinda cheating.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's plain ol' fucking stupid.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, these are really silly if you can use quotes or like place/person names. Like if my Dad named Had lived in a town called Had Had, and his favorite thing to say was "had had had"...it just becomes like stupid to say that's some crazy example of a grammatical sentence even if it technically is.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] gigachad@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago

I salivated so hard trying to pronounce that word the whole metro is looking at me now

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Edididid

I've also found that most words become surreal the harder you look at them.

Say the word green like 50 times in a row and tell me that shit's not made up (all words are lmao)

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Semantic satiation is the word you're looking for. :)

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

all words are made up ????..!!

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I can't tell if this is sarcastic shock or if this is the type of comment I was trying to preempt by acknowledging that fact.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 months ago

Let me also introduce you to the concept of tongue twisters.

Or, to come to the point:
"Lesser leather never weathered wetter weather better."

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] digger@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

I think Stephen Fry famously tripped over this one.

[–] Looseygoosey@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

So is.. "and Harry pocketed it."

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Edi de de ded

[–] hakase@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The one I always heard was "Dead-headed Ed edited it".

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Zed's dead, baby, Zed's dead.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Much more straightforward in British English where d and t are more distinct

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago

Edded a tit

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago

Within 50 years all vowel sounds in English will just be schwa.

[–] TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I actually kinda like how it feels to say.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 1 points 3 months ago

Eddie Teddie

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

Also "clothes".

Klo-dthy-sys.

[–] DempstersBox@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

semantic saturation before you're done saying it

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

A D-Day tit