this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
21 points (88.9% liked)

Canada

10797 readers
278 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

setting a precedent that threatens billions in real-estate investment.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Ya know.

As a non native.

I could give a flying fuck what kind of economic hardship honouring the treaties my ancestors signed.

Give them half of Toronto for all I fucking care.

Actions have consequences and if our government is to have any moral legitimacy we need to do what we say we'll do. Even if our ancestors said it.

I also love the idea of a bunch of rich developers getting fucked sideways on their investments but that's just me.

[–] lemmie689 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

For this claim, the Gov of BC says they will back $150 million in loan guarantees. There was a $35 mil industrial compound under development which lost its funding from a traditional lender, so thats part of it. The rest is for mortgage holders of homes who may be affected, and et al, I don't have all the details. The story is developing.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago

don't threaten me with a good time 🤣

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ok...so, first of all...this article is spouting nothing but hyperbolic bullshit. No one's private land ownership is being challenged, or infringed upon with this decision, whether in this specific case, or in any broader sense.

The most that the Cowichan Tribe is asking for, is fair compensation for the land that was stolen from them, and recognition of their claim to the land that is still "publicly owned". No one is "coming for privately owned land".

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago

For the record, I completely disagree with the framing in the article. I think this is an excellent decision by the court and I hope that sets a precedent for more land reconciliation.

[–] rexbron@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The comment section On the article is a racist cesspool.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

On the bright side it looks like they may have been removed?

[–] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For people wondering about the general creditability of the source.

Wall Street Journal quietly walks back false claim Charlie Kirk shooter had pro-trans messages on his bullets

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/wall-street-journal-quietly-walks-182931692.html

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

That source helps, thank you. Explains a good amount from sound legal context without being too alarmist.

[–] lemmie689 4 points 5 days ago