this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
553 points (98.8% liked)

Not The Onion

19455 readers
1578 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 232 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

“I’d much rather make a squatter homeless than have a landlord lose property,” James added.

Keeping it classy.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 68 points 3 weeks ago (54 children)

wanted to say the same thing. what a dickhead, simping for landlords.

load more comments (54 replies)
[–] johnyreeferseed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 weeks ago

I thought for sure I was on the onion when I read that line. Sad that it's real

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 3 weeks ago

he smells like a nimby. he probably would be at the place when MILLBRAE(rich white residents) were complaining about converting a former hotel into a liviing space for the impoverished that occured like last year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 128 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

“I’d much rather make a squatter homeless than have a landlord lose property,” Jacobs added.

These are the pieces of shit your politicians listen to every time they increase funding for police enforcement against the homeless, and deny zoning changes, even if it would improve the housing crisis. "theft is always bad no matter what 🤓☝️"

You have to be genuinely mentally ill to believe that someone going homeless is better than someone with more properties than they need to live in losing one of those properties so someone has a place to live.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 weeks ago

Especially empty properties.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] shininghero@pawb.social 118 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

...with professional-grade tactical gear.
The gear includes firearms, ballistic full-body armor, flash bangs and smoke grenades, tear gas...

Where the fuck are you sourcing explosives and tear gas as a civilian, and more importantly...
Where can I get some? Purely for home defense, of course. Definitely not wanting it for defrost purposes.

[–] brap@lemmy.world 61 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Plus points for “defrosting” there, very nicely put.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 weeks ago

It would seem contrary to known physics, but tear gas actually makes frozen water whine like little bitches. 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] tal@lemmy.today 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Where the fuck are you sourcing explosives and tear gas as a civilian

https://www.keepshooting.com/clear-out-6oz-tear-gas-grenade.html

Clear Out 6oz Tear Gas Grenade

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Totally legal, all of that. The grenades require a $200 DD stamp each (don't think the smokes do, unsure about tear gas - I know I bought smoke grenades for airsoft all the time back when I played), but everything there is totally legal from your local gun show or Bubba.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MantisToboggon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The best part is the 50/50 on if they work or not

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 71 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

its very important that the property remains empty, you see. if we allowed people to pay too little for it that would drive the prices of our other properties down.

literally just the passage from grapes of wrath.

[–] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 55 points 3 weeks ago

this is a puff piece about the kind of gangster who turns up murdered and unmourned

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 50 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

“The average squatter has no melee experience,”

But what about magic? Magic beats melee in the combat triangle.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 50 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I’d much rather make a squatter homeless than have a landlord lose property,” Jacobs added

I'd much rather make poor people without an option homeless than have a rich asshole lose some money!

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Right? Like, what in the fuck?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 49 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

This fool is going to get shot.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I assume it's a joke, but the guy said professional tactical gear and firearms apparently, as well as teargas and such. If he's not joking I'd say their odds of going to prison are pretty good. Premeditating and provoking a situation with deadly weapons instead of contacting actual authorities and following the laws/procedure doesn't seem like it would work out well for anyone.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn't that the exact gear that cops use to break up homeless encampments?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Whether we like it or not, those cops are the proper procedure/authorities in said situation. Thus they are allowed by law. I can't just hire a neighbor to show up to a homeless camp with said gear and expect when something goes wrong for them not to get arrested for murder/battery, and probably be arrested for something else. Paying them to do so probably has a different terminology than an accessory. Might fall under the rico shit, not sure

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Squatters rights are an important part of common law and they serve as a foundational means of ensuring valuable real estate remains in use. Adverse possession requires openly living somewhere for years without permission or resistance from the owner

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 36 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

sword-wielding man

ASAP Squatter Removal has a 95%+ success rate

Every now and then, you run into a spearman.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

These people think evil quest givers in games are role models, not warnings.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 28 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

We must defend the empty properties!

Also, we must solve the housing crisis by building more houses!

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It's gonna be really funny when dude gets charged with menacing and extortion.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 weeks ago

He's gonna meet a former mall ninja/disciple of the sword fedora wearing meth head and he gonna die.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ads for this type of services show up in craigslist regularly where I live. Named organizations like Viking Acquisitions or FAFO LLC post weekly. I bugged the local newspaper about it, but they were disinterested.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Ok......but what happens when a squatter has a gun?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Then I’ll train and purposely squat so that this stain can be humbled

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 21 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Home ownership is now a soulslike? I've been training for this my whole middle-aged life.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah fuck squatters too. Everyone sucks here but squatters are just as trashy. We need to have a vacant homes penalty desperately but yeah that won't happen anytime soon if ever in my lifetime.

[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

We need to have a vacant homes penalty desperately

Technically that's what adverse possession or squatters rights actually is.

The general criteria(without state specifics) for legal squatting is incredibly difficult to fulfill though. It's not reasonable to achieve in the majority of situations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Everyone here sucks except the squatters.

Edit: This is very contraversial for some reason nobody cares to defend but consider that a house is first and foremost a tool and squatters are the only people in the story correctly using a house for its only real purpose. I'm not saying they're good people, just that they're the only people not enganged in some kind of elaborate fraud or thinly vieled attempt to murder humans.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you were a tenant and you are getting kicked out you should have different rights like a proper eviction and a court date.

If you just broke in you should simply be removed by the cops on penalty of law if the landlord lies and you are actually a tenant who was illegally evicted.

This is what the law in liberal wa state is.

[–] BrickEater@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

In theory yeah, but squatters rights do exist for a purpose of keeping abandoned buildings from just decaying if you can show you've been maintaining it in the owners absence. Now I'm not saying that they're used like that now but that is their actual purpose.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] n0respect@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

He stabbed me with a sword Mal ... How weird!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

There seems to be the implication within that quote that because he’s brought a melee weapon, the party being attacked is bound by honor not to use a firearm.

In fact he’s probably putting himself in much more danger by bringing a sword (thereby providing a self-defense defense) than if he showed up unarmed.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

bay area homeowners about to lose homes

if you have trouble with squatters, i am willing to sell professional advice on how to get them to leave. it never fails.

[–] g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

donning full plate armor and a dagger "Luckily I'm no average squatter"

load more comments
view more: next ›