this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
92 points (98.9% liked)

Slop.

772 readers
582 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I only want to hear answers from Tankies right now.

Edit: I feel like I’m really spamming this place with low-grade Reddit slop today but honestly I just keep finding a goldmine of toxic lib-brain and don’t know what to do with it so I’m sorry, y’all.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 49 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i am in favor of documenting as much as possible. that way, in a decade or whatever, after the provisional revolutionary government has re-established basic order, citizen documentation can be matched with the declassified archives to make sure we hunt down each and every one of these fucks as part of a comprehensive denazification program.

especially the clever ones that managed to avoid justice during the initial chaos. they cannot be allowed to hide.

I also agree with documentation for the exact reasons you’ve specified, but… suing?? In this economy??

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 47 points 2 weeks ago

Why don't those immigrants illegally detained by ICE not simply call their lawyers? Are they stupid?

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 32 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Flinch@hexbear.net 29 points 2 weeks ago

"heh, wait till my lawyer hears about this" I say smugly while being forced to my knees in front of the pit I just dug at gunpoint

[–] PurrLure@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"RULE OF LAW", I shriek as I gradually shrink into a corncob, "YOU CAN'T JUST BREAK THE HECK'IN LAWARINOS" corn-man-khrush

But yeah, if libs or anyone else wants to go bananas on recording ICE go for it.

[–] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

i've said this a million times by now, but liberals really do believes laws and fallacious arguments work like harry potter spells. you just yell out the name (to quoque! appeal to authority! that's illegal!) and point and then the badguy shrinks into a corncob

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago

The only lawyer I want to hear from right now is Daredevil

Maybe Vigilante, but he strikes me more as an ICE supporter

Daredevil has all that Catholic guilt, easy to manipulate

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

You know I feel kind of bad for them at first and chalk it up to naive ignorance, and then they start blaming Russia and body shaming everybody they don’t like.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

Slop is slop, spam as much as you want so long as it's not a repost or literally DDOSing the site by posting a 50,000 threads in two minutes.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Liberals: Surely, the courts will save us!

The courts:

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

Bit idea: Joe Biden, Mortarch of Delusion

[–] 420lenin69@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

SCOTUS ruled a long time ago that it doesn’t matter if what the cop did was illegal.

If the cop might have possibly thought it was legal while doing it, like if it could be imagined that maybe the cop thought it was legal, then it’s legal for the cop to do it.

Quite literally that’s the law of the land in the USA. Until SCOTUS rules that you cannot shoot a woman in the face as a border patrol agent in Minnesota, then maybe just maybe the cop thought he was allowed to do it. And the cop did it which is evidence the cop at least felt it was legal. So even though inevitably it will be ruled illegal because it’s obviously murder, it’s still ok for the cop to do that.

If anything, capturing evidence that the practice of brutalizing protestors is commonplace would be, in effect, legally exonerating the cops in the eyes of SCOTUS.

[–] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

And the people at the top of the administration are telling them "you are allowed to do anything you want," so of course they might believe they're allowed to do whatever they want. Neat little circle!