this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
110 points (97.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

37394 readers
1770 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit to add my opinion so I'm not just replying "I agree" to 90% of comments. I think it should be legal, properly regulated, taxed and viewed as a profession. I haven't personally engaged in it but I have no moral objection to it. I do hate the common sentiment that it was the individual's "only option" though.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RamenDame@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Even in countries were it is legal and has some kind of regulation, it still has exploitative character. Not for all but for many. And I think forced labor, of different degrees, is more common then you think.

Even when regulated and legal, we need to think about the careers after sex work. Can those people freely transfer into a new position without discrimination?

And since there is discrimination, worker rights, and often women and gay rights, are neglected.

To establish a safe working space for sex workers it is not enough to regulate and make it legal. You need to actively support each group individually and make it clear, that as for every other form of employment you have rights and someone else is actively fighting for it. It is not enough to tell people they have rights and they have to fight all by themselves. Especially when we have established that human trafficking, exploitation, femizide, and so much more are common.

So I think the answer should not be: just make it legal and write regulation. It should be: what actually is a safe working space for all, no matter if selfemployed or working in a brothel.

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

It's legal and regulated. Seems to work fine. I don't know anyone who wants to outlaw it.

[–] psion1369@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Regulated with provisions for safety. I'm all for the idea it should be in a specific license location, like love hotels or massage parlors or something like that. No going to someones house or a different hotel.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

And unionized, and the employer pays for (without touching employee pay):

  • PPE (including gloves, dental dams, and male and female condoms, which are mandatory for any and all physical contact that includes genitals, mucous membranes, feet, or non-intact skin).
  • regular STD testing
  • vaccinations
  • optional pharmacologic prophylaxis
  • building security
  • both bedside and wearable panic alarms
  • identity monitoring and protection / assistance removing their personal information from publicly accessible records.

Every room should be required to have a poster listing employee rights.

Aside from pricing differently for specific services (handjob vs blowjob etc) tipping is illegal.

No employee (particularly owners or supervisors) are allowed to receive service at their own location or any owned by a same parent company.

The owner and any shift supervisors are required to take a class on these regulations and sit for and pass a licensure exam.

Independent workers can receive a special, less restrictive license (that includes basic sex ed but mostly focuses on informing them of their rights and that independent means independent not "your boss just doesn't want to get a license" and keeping people with intellectual disabilities or low educational level from being misinformed of their rights as a sex worker).

They worker will never face charges for not having a license but their boss or any John (Jane?) / client who can't prove the sex worker or company was licensed (or that they were significantly or intentionally misled) can.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago

If you buy a hooker you are a pathetic fucking loser and worthless piece of shit. I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

As long as the industry has regulations that help keep the prostitutes safe ( generic things like STD testing and time off to clear that all up, ways to deal with rowdy, rough customers, etcetera ) In have zero problem as long as the workers are consenting and at least in their mid to late 20s to keep the creepiest of people out.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You know what would give women power over men? Allowing them to charge money for sex. This is why it's so demonized. It should be legalized so it can be regulated with health standards, and standards of engagement that protect everyone, like condom use, and having to do monthly or weekly STD/HIV checks. Make it 21+ ID is required to buy and sell services.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

Nah, that's not it. Germany has legal and - theoretically - regulated prostitution, and society is not meaningfully different than, say, France in that redgard as far as I can tell.

There are other issues associated with it, but just that one argument alone doesn't seem to work based on what I've seen.

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

As a dude, i sucked a dick for big money to some rich old guy. With inflation, over 900 dollars for like nothing. So im biased

I think it needs to be legalized world wide to give it an opportunity to be regulated. If its already happening might as well capitalism the industry. Its going to happen either way, or the world will continue to have deep state sex clubs.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago

how do i do this that sounds awesome

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 22 hours ago

Many complaints against prostitution also apply to trading labor for money/shelter in general. People just have a stronger emotional response.

Emotional responses are rarely a good foundation for policy.

Prostitution should be legal with safety regulations. All labor should have protections, unions, and such, to protect them from being abused by the wealthy.

Some specific things would probably remain illegal or disallowed, in the same sense that you're not allowed to work construction without safety gear. People can wear condoms as easily as hard hats and hi-viz vests.

[–] Oak_Kitten@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As long as all parties involved are consenting adults it’s none of my business what they are up to. Except that prostitution should be legalized in a way in which they get equal rights and protections to other professions. The only reason it’s illegal in many countries in the first place is likely based on religious Puritanism, which I do not think laws should ever be based on.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Even Calvinists in the Netherlands legalised prostitution.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

suspect it's not in spite of their faith, but... in recognition of their humanity and lack of hypocrisy when it comes to humans.

unlike other places where they'll decry prostitution then rape the alterboys.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn't a core philosophy of Calvinists basically "god loves capitalism" (before the word was really established)?

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

this is a fascinating question I don't have time to delve deeper into atm but a little googling:

"Calvin increasingly conceived of a state where the rulers were limited in order to ensure protection of religion."

"Calvin argued for moderation in business ethics. Lending and profit-making should be permitted only insofar as they were useful, never simply to build personal wealth."

https://reflections.yale.edu/article/money-and-morals-after-crash/calvinism-and-capitalism-together-again

but Calvin himself is entwined with capitalism

https://daily.jstor.org/john-calvin-religious-reformer-influenced-capitalism/

"Calvin’s theological beliefs, based upon his study of the Bible, captured adherents from around the Christian world as Geneva became a center of Protestant thought. He became known as a proponent of predestination, the belief that God’s rewards for humans have already been selected. It was later frequently invoked by wealthy Christians to justify their opulence as part of God’s plan that should not be disturbed by revolutions or high taxes. But Bouwsma argues that is a misinterpretation of what is a subtle theological doctrine about God’s mercy for believers."

I suspect this is more capitalists embracing calvinism because the think it fits their desires but like most of religion, it's people using a higher power to justify their wealth lol.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

So long as it's regulated and all parties are safe and consenting then it's none of my business. It's not something i'd be interested in however. To each their own.

[–] Novamdomum@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only thing more certain to exist till the end of time than prostitution is people complaining about it. I like it because it makes something explicit that is implicit in so many apparently non transactional relationships. There are so many people who say prostitution should be banned, who are also in relationships/marriages where they expect sex for shelter, food, safety or whatever. Prostitution makes the transaction clear. People point to the exploitative nature of it, but then reveal their real agenda by also rejecting the idea of making it safer for the people selling access to their bodies. The whole thing is a massively hypocritical pile of double standards. Mix into that cultures with backwards patriarchal religious doctrines and that's where you get the really angry people who talk about dishonor and stoning and all that jazz. Prostitution has been around since there were people and will always be around. When the puritans are in charge it just hides for a bit. This has been my TED talk, thanks lol

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

"Kyle, every boy pays for kisses. Do you know what I am saying? If you got a girl and she kisses you, sooner or later you're paying for it. You gotta take her out to lunch, take her to a movie, and then spend time listening to all her stupid problems. Look, look at Stan right there. He's got to sit there and listen to all her stupid motherf___ing problems 'cause she kisses him. If you ask me, that's a lot more than the $5 my company charges."

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

We should find out which policy minimises harm to those participating in it. Then, regardless of how anyone might feel about that policy, implement it.

[–] remon@ani.social 96 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Never had anything to do with it personally, but just like with drugs it should be legal and regulated because it's impossible to prohibit it.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

yes, sex work is not going away, it's too damn popular

sex workers need to be protected and legalised and helped if in situations like addiction

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hard agree.

Regulate it, tax it, protect the workers and users. Prevent the spread of diseases and use the money to ensure their futures.

Minimize harm, maximize happiness.

Failure to do so is a failure of society.

After all, we already have so many people making money on onlyfans and through doing pornography, which is legalized prostitution anyway, so the people that do that in a non-video scenario should have at least the same protections.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

One of the commenters said it was fundamentally gross to them..

It's fundamentally depressing to me: intimacy's .. unending.

There's no such thing as "a 1-night stand", or "just a fuck" .. you'll never be unmixed with that someone..

& doing it as mere-transaction, or mere-physicality .. ??

but apparently that view that most of a someone isn't physical, & most of sex isn't physical either, is deemed to be nonsense,

& pretending that merely-physical is "all that exists" is actually common ..

so, my perspective is deemed lunacy or idiocy by this world.

But seeing women being used for mere-physical sensation by random strangers, as a purchased-transaction .. that's depressing..

I wish the world didn't work that way.

I'm with all the people who want prostitution not-criminalized, who want it taxed & regulated, & I'd add that I want pimping criminalized: let women form cooperatives, or something, but nobody should coerce anybody into the biz of being used bodily.

_ /\ _

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Absolutely should be legal and taxed, with rules and regulations in place to protect clients and workers.

I pretty much do have moral objections to it, its fundamentally gross to me, but its not going to stop and id rather these prostitutes work in a safe place and pay their taxes like the rest of us than get their passports taken by a guy named The Scorpion with a spider Web tattooed on his neck.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As a former prostitute its work and legitamite work but it needs more protection

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago

I think it should be legalized. The only thing wrong with sex outside of procreation is absolutely nothing. I have a hunch it would help with a lot of social ills out there. Why, in most depictions of the old west, you could go to town and get a prostitute. Eventually, powerful people with sexual hang-ups and twisted morals restricted the activity and pushed it underground where it's dirty and dangerous.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 day ago (10 children)

It should be legal, safe, and taxed

load more comments (10 replies)

I'm not going to read through to find where Carlin was already quoted, but I stick with "selling is legal, f****** is legal, why isn't selling f****** legal?

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the individual selling their services is doing so freely and isn't being exploited in any sort of way then I don't have a problem with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sex work is just work, as long as it is all between consenting adults.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RegularJoe@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Looking at the pros and the cons, it must be the opposite of CONstitution.

...I'll see myself out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So long as everyone is able to legally and safely consent I don't see an issue.

I don't have a problem with prostitution, I have a problem when socioeconomic conditions lead people to feeling like they have to sell their bodies to survive. If prostitution is completely voluntary, then it's fine.

load more comments
view more: next ›