this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
100 points (96.3% liked)

electoralism

22260 readers
83 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 53 points 3 days ago (2 children)

All I'm saying is that if I was making six- figures a MONTH i would have set up so much mutual aid and given equipment and resources to already established orgs.

The only way you'd catch me in a mcmansion is if it was also being used as the central meetingplace for the commune I fund

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 62 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I mean, an individual funding a union on par with entire labor orgs is pretty impressive and practically unheard of

[–] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Ok respect where it's due that's awesome

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

your original post was correct, he does nothing locally, he's not funding any mutual aid in Los Angeles, the amazon labor union was on the other side of the country while people die on the streets a few blocks from his home

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

Yes and locally he and a lot of other pseudo progressives are backing a zionist

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

yeah I think he's raised like millions for other things too. he is certainly doing much more than most people with his status and if he didn't exist it's not like there would be anyone filling his place in a more radical way, just a power/audience vacuum for the right to fill

load more comments (3 replies)

If i made even a quarter of hasans income i think i'd literally have more money than i could know what to do with

[–] RondoRevolution@hexbear.net 55 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Wait, Hasan is actually defending that dem mf that had the nazi tattoo? /srs

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 62 points 3 days ago (5 children)

yes. he says that "platner has changed"

[–] RondoRevolution@hexbear.net 57 points 3 days ago (1 children)

sadness-abysmal look at my western left, there's no way

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 24 points 3 days ago (5 children)

My feelings are extremely mixed. I want to believe people can change. I do think seeing the evil eye to eye can awaken people, even if that change isn’t immediate. I also think that we live in a Nazi ass country so yeah a gormless boot could get a Nazi tattoo and have it just float through the milieu for a time.

I also think it’s an incredible indictment of everything that he says he got security clearances etc with that tattoo. Apparently nobody noticed it was a symbol from the literal SS? I’m not buying it. There’s a real story here that our government doesn’t give a fuck about blatant Nazi ink. That’s real fucking bad.

I still don’t trust Platner but the whole thing is fucky

[–] GnastyGnuts@hexbear.net 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The tattoo is a red-herring for the fact that Platner "served" at Fallujah, was a torture-camp guard at Abu Ghraib, and worked as a mercenary for Blackwater, long after they were pretty much exclusively known for committing war crimes (and had changed their name to avoid the association with said crimes).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Totenkopf tattoo: maybe he was just an idiot and has changed. He did get it covered up.

"Serving" in the Fourth Reich's army, then becoming a mercenary: redemption requires at minimum he makes "marg bar amriKKKa" the most important plank of his platform. Veterans who do not feel ashamed of being veterans are irredeemable.

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Exactly, I know so many veterans who have nothing but regret for that time and are anti-war and so on. Platner clearly loved that period of his life and regrets nothing, which is disturbing

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

See that’s part of why I don’t trust him. He’s like “anti war” as in “bring the boys home” it’s too government coded “love da troops” setting off some real old John Kerry shaped alarm bells in my head

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. "Bring the boys home?" Why, so they can pilot drones and murder people in safety? Fuck them, it warms my heart whenever I hear one of these war-criminal boys die.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apparently nobody noticed it was a symbol from the literal SS? I’m not buying it.

His fellow crayon eaters tried to use the excuse that holding up the SS flag isn't nazi shit because SS stood for "scout sniper." They all fucking knew.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

I’ll never forget that brazen lie, like all those dudes raised on the same WWII movies as me didn’t know what the SS symbol was. Also wasn’t Australia part of that debacle?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 21 points 3 days ago

True but here's the full context

Platner has ~~ex~~changed ~~money with sellout Hasan Piker~~

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Monk3brain3@hexbear.net 32 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Yes Hasan is a moron or a sellout

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 51 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not the one with a massive audience and a ton of money, but sure

[–] free_casc@hexbear.net 24 points 3 days ago (21 children)

You won't find me running defense for Planter but it takes more than a massive audience and a couple million dollars to "build the vanguard".

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 36 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Gives you a much better chance than the average bear

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Hexbears' obsession with Hasan continues to baffle me. He's just a vaguely center-left streamer, that's it really. Doesn't do anything controversial or exciting in any direction. I've seen him say and do some pretty good stuff and bad stuff, and I'm left very ambivalent.

I really don't know how other people here have built up such strong feeling about him that they must 'criticise and call psyop' or 'laud him and all entryism' with every action he does.

Yeah that's right I'm taking shots at BOTH SIDES here broken

[–] PleasantPeasant@hexbear.net 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

i dont think he gets posted that much, but honestly he's kinda getting to the point where calling him "just a streamer" is way understating his impact, the media is obsessed with him for months now and he's actively trying to get involved with politics to a significant level. Like, the dems in control of the party genuinely see him as a threat, i really dont think we should be downplaying him as a little smoll bean streamer anymore

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This mostly just points to your own ignorance about what is going on in the mainstream media. Hasan comes up around here once, maybe twice a week, but he is non-stop in the news cycle for mainstream Dems. The fact that my mother knows who he is means that he has reached the average politics watcher (which is still a minority entertainment product).

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

Does it point to my ignorance? Or does it point to the fact that I'm just not a USAian?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] abc@hexbear.net 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

I have been saying this about Hasan (and all 'leftist' streamers/podcasters/etc) for years lol. Ultimately I do genuinely believe that once you hit a certain point in terms of wealth/yearly income, especially when your wealth is derived from sitting in front of your computer/microphone all day giving your opinions on various political things and promoting various people in politics to 2000+ sycophants in your chat or subbed to your patreon, you just become a Petite Bourgeise caricature of who you claim to be.

This goes for all 5 of the Chapos (virgil-sad believe it or not he's had what I'd consider to be the 'ideal' grift - he made his money, made a bit more agreeing to co-host Bad Faith, and then dipped - never to be seen posting online again outside of presumably some teenager's DMs) and everyone who streams on Twitch.tv.

You can say "Well Hasan went to Cuba and did activism" and "He kept X union afloat" and that's well & good, admirable even, but I don't think that absolves him from the fact that he also will gladly support some ex-nazi democrat candidate who will probably vote Yes on any Cuba sanctions and do fucking nothing but middling shit in office. Same guy who supported Fetterman and when challenged on this (before Fetterman was even elected), basically said the same thing he says today about Platner. "smuglord I don't like him either but you know we have to play this game to win guys!! Also don't bring this up in 2 years when I'm tweeting about how much of a piece of shit Platner is because I'll say something smug like 'you really got me with that one'"

"We need more John Fettermans. Stop looking a gift horse in the mouth. Ugh leftists have this really bad ability to make every candidate's worst traits/moments the only thing that matters. He supports M4A!!!" michael-laugh

Adam Johnson & Nima Shirazi remain undefeated.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ultimately I do genuinely believe that once you hit a certain point in terms of wealth/yearly income

It's not even about the amount, it's about them wanting to continue to do their current job as a streamer/podcaster/whatever. If they are too extreme they get deplatformed, so they have to remain very mild in their opinions, they have to "play to the algorithm" and making content that gets views is more important than content that incites the masses. Anyone who is extremely radical probably isn't going to last long on any corporate media at all, if they are even willing to use it in the first place. No one wants to lose their job, and in a field like that, where the "boss" is way more arbitrary and inconsistent than most, these guys would probably much rather play it safe.

It's not just these sorts of jobs too, it's anything creative on the internet. If you want to make a living off of it, it can't be too radical or too extreme or else it will just be removed, so anyone pushing properly revolutionary ideas online will need to do it as a hobby or side project, which means their soul-crushing job under capital will need to come first, which will prevent them from making much content, and if you don't produce tons of content, you get buried by the algorithm. There's probably hundreds of really solid leftist youtubers and podcasters and such who do it in their off time and get maybe 20 views an episode because they can only release one every 6 months or so and the algorithm hates their content or their stuff just gets taken down because it is actively educating and inciting.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 37 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Starting to think the brooklyn ‘left’ doesn’t just love right wing aesthetics, all they need is a right winger to hint about free healthcare

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 26 points 3 days ago

Hey that’s unfair! He lives in West Hollywood, not Brooklyn!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] LadyCajAsca@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

he read it, then promptly forgot about it

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, thats too bad.

Contrapoints really got ahead of her selling out with that name. It already feels like an insult pun. It makes stuff like Cointelpoints seem like a hat on a hat when it isnt

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Poophammer@hexbear.net 33 points 3 days ago

NnnnoooooOOOOOOOO LEAVE MY HECKIN STREAMER HIMBO BEST FRIEND ALONE HES A SOCIALISM TOO GUYS

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Everyone in this thread is deeply unserious. If anyone thinks any of this matters I beg you to touch grass and join an org.

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I have no issue with Hassan because Hassan exists in his own world. His only purpose is to begin the process of deprogramming libs.

He's also one of the only ones I've seen that actually seems like he would just full hog for any real revolutionary movement that forms. Dude was just a steamer and is now probably equally as influential as Fox news. He knows this leads nowhere and welcomes punches from the left.

TLDR; keep bullying Hasan, keep agitating. Join an org, don't hate people who follow him, but make sure they learn as much as possible and help show them what his role actually is.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah bro listen bro we gotta do entryism bro I know it's failed hundreds of times in hundreds of countries bro but we gotta do it ONE MORE TIME

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Keld@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago

I think it's funny to do this after the democrats spent like a year marking you out as as bad as trump.

[–] deforestgump@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago

Get off the internet. Get your head in some books. Stop glorifying content creators like they are the Al-Ghayb

load more comments
view more: next ›