this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
62 points (98.4% liked)

chat

8619 readers
250 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m curious what the general consensus is here cause I am so so fucking tired of listening to people talk about Graham Platner.

I’m amenable to the possibility of him being decent but I am not holding my breath over it.

it’s just another perfect example of the inherent flaws in “the left” ever hitching its wagon to the fucking Democratic Party.

That phrase “the left” makes my skin crawl in general. I am so tired of having to constantly wrest the identity of a historic movement away from this or that charlatan, it is humiliating to me and my peers to invest faith and trust in these people.

But without a party, who can we say represents “the left”? With the crimes of chattel slavery and now Palestinian genocide, is this party really the vehicle?

As far as I’m concerned any Democratic politician has a massive bar to clear for any support from me. More importantly I think we can point to some disturbingly clear examples that the institutional forces of Democratic Party politics easily overawing any individual representative of “the left”

I don’t like to disparage people choosing optimism in general. It just seems so glaringly obvious that without an enforcement mechanism outside of the Democratic Party there is very little to create any kind of actual accountability and there is nothing but unlimited reward for participation and substance-less posturing.

Wonder what the PSL is up to! Wish them nothing but good things.

Curious where everyone is besides sick of this. WHO gives a fuck! It’s Maine! Hardly anyone lives there! Have you ever seen a black fly? Too scary in general this is just par for the course

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Platner is kind of the perfect embodiment of the Left's issue with the state of electoralism in this country.

He's very obviously the lesser evil compared to Collins. And you can even make a strategic voting argument that him winning might actually be a catalyst towards moving the Dems in a direction that materially improves people's live. But not enough to fix any fundamental problems, so of course the fascists will take back power again in a few years and undo all that and march us further down the path to Fourth Reichdom.

...and the price you pay for that is you've gotta vote for the unrepentant war criminal.

Oh, and there's like a 80/20 chance that he's just a disingenuous ghoul, or will simply be assimilated into the Dem blob. I honestly think we're going to look back a few years and wonder why in the hell we cared about this guy at all.

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 14 points 17 hours ago

The guy went on multiple tours in Iraq and then as a blackwater mercenary in afghanistan. He defended people getting SS runes tattooed^[https://hexbear.net/post/6500448], he devised a way to keep shelling dense urban areas without getting detected after it got forbidden because the murder count got too high even for the US military^[https://hexbear.net/post/6562224], he wanted to "kill thousands ... maybe millions. Our way of life is better and if that is what it takes to prevail, lets get this show on the road"^[https://hexbear.net/post/6563795]

[–] Sneakytrickyyy@hexbear.net 14 points 18 hours ago

I hope he pays for his crimes, and I swear "the left" is just shorthand for losers who will suck up to the Democrats because "no movement we are just smol beans we have to play the game with what we have hasan-ok-dude"

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

He has an actual fucking SS tattoo. That should be the end of any discussion.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 11 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

*had

he got a coverup when people found out about it. if he was really reformed he would've not required a scandal for motivation.

[–] goferking0 8 points 15 hours ago

being pedantic he still has it just covered up, and covered by something else that still is nazi adjacent

[–] Crucible@hexbear.net 9 points 18 hours ago

I seem to remember when he covered it there was still two little bottom bits of bone sticking out like an old man's balls hanging out of his shorts

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 26 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

it’s just another perfect example of the inherent flaws in “the left” ever hitching its wagon to the fucking Democratic Party.

It sounds like people just didn't understand what made 2016-era Sanders special. People liked 2016-era Sanders because he wasn't a card-carrying Democrat. He was just some dude with a history of progressive politics who only went through the motions of being a DINO in an attempt to steal the Democratic nomination from Clinton in the primaries. That's why people liked Sanders. People said similar things about Trump. That's the whole deal about Trump taking the Republican nomination from the "cuckservatives" like Jeb! and Ted Cruz.

AOC, Mamdani, et al are a regression for the very simple reason that they are sincere members of the Democratic Party. Unlike 2016-era Sanders (or more accurately, people's false impression of Sanders during 2016 when they thought Sanders would form his own party after losing the nomination instead of bending the knee), they are not there to undermine the Democratic Party. Even without getting into how they fall short from a socialist perspective, they don't even challenge the duopoly in any meaningful sense nor do they try to advocate around progressive causes like abolishing the electoral college.

Here's hoping a charismatic person who's totally not affiliated with PSL would crash the 2028 Democratic primaries in order to steal the nomination from Gruesome Newsome.

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 1 points 1 hour ago

The fact is running in the Democrat Primary is absolutely an unavoidable tactic that every leftist/socialist must embrace if they want to actually hold officr. Its functionally nothing more than a preliminary runoff election. But after that you must maintain a strong "fuck the DNC" attitude. Do not seek party endorsements. Embrace any "not a real democrat" label. And for the love of all that's holy, do not even think about touching ActBlue or NGPVan. Squat that (D).

[–] LaBellaLotta@hexbear.net 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That’s such an excellent point and it had completely escaped me but you’re absolutely right.

Bernie Sanders had more of a proven record of antagonizing the Democratic Party establishment than anyone who’s come to represent “the left” since.

My greatest fear is that the momentum of “the left” whatever the fuck that means is captured, redirected and squandered by the Democrats because historically that is just what they do! And now the narrative become ““the left” has been tried and is a dead letter” to a whole generation who come afterwards.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You know how Lenin said how you should only participate in bourgeois elections to the extent where you can show to the working class how much of a sham bourgeois elections are. That was basically Sanders' run in 2016. There was a certain level of audacity, which still make Hilldawg stans seethe to this very day, of some dude who had never once registered as a Democrat strolling up to the Democratic primaries and giving the presumptive career Democrat nominee a run for her money. AOC sucking up to Pelosi look completely pathetic in comparison.

Sanders fucked up/revealed himself to be a sheepdog in disguise by not channeling that anger and outrage over getting ratfucked towards forming his own party. Most post-Sanders electoralists are essentially arguing that Sanders failed because he was an independent instead of a Democrat and that had he been a Democrat, he would've won the primaries against Clinton somehow. In fact, the opposite would be true: had Sanders been a Democrat, he would've ate shit even harder because a lot of people only liked Sanders because he wasn't a loser Democrat like Clinton.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly! The comparison to Trump and Sanders is very important, because at the time they both represented a break from the norms of the existing parties. When Sanders failed to capture the anger after being sandbagged by the Democrats he actually seeded a bunch of voters TO Trump because now HE was proven to be the OUTSIDER who could actually fucking win. There is a whole stratum of people who saw Sanders loose and then Trump scoop the win, who went "Aw hell yeah, Trump is daddy now!".

Had Sanders captured that energy, by announcing a grassroots working class party, god only knows how history would have gone.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 3 points 4 hours ago

Had Sanders captured that energy, by announcing a grassroots working class party, god only knows how history would have gone.

My idea is that:

  1. ML parties like PSL will have less members since many people would've joined Sander's party instead.

  2. The DSA would probably be a defunct org since given the choices between Sander's party and more radical parties like the PSL, why would anyone hitch their wagon with the DSA? In many ways, the DSA is (poorly) filling the void that should've been filled by Sander's party.

  3. I think a lot of the current crop of so-called progressives like AOC would either not have political careers or simply run as generic Democrats without any hint of progressivism. What would AOC's political career even look like? Would she join Sander's party or would she just be some generic Democrat? Much of the online arguments and struggle sessions over whether so and so is legit or controlled opposition would not exist or look very different. Perhaps people will accuse alt-history AOCIA or alt-history Mamdani of joining Sander's party to undermine it from within.

  4. Most of the leftist influencer space would have less obnoxious politics since instead of glazing the Democrats and coming up with excuses for their failures, they would be glazing Sander's party (and coming up with excuses for their failures) instead.

  5. Sander's party would be at the crossroads after al-Aqsa Flood when Sander goes completely mask off as an unrepentant Zionist. I do not think Sanders can control the anti-Zionism that almost everyone within the party would believe in, but what happens to the party is anybody's guess. Maybe there would be a mass exodus of members which causes the party to collapse. Maybe Sanders would be expelled from the party for being a Zionist piece of shit. Hell, maybe the bourgeoisie moves to crush the party through the security apparatus.

There's a timeline where Sander's party develops their politics well beyond Sanders to the point of expelling him for being a reactionary and eventually merging with PSL.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dkr567@hexbear.net 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Also sick of hearing about the nazi mercenary shit bag that is just going to be another Fetterman and rest of the war criminals at the senate

[–] LaBellaLotta@hexbear.net 7 points 18 hours ago

Most likely outcome truly

[–] la_tasalana_intissari_mata@hexbear.net 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

the problem with Platner is that if he gets away with this shit the democratic party can practically get Donald Trump as the "progressive candidate" for some state. Western politics are a sham, shamelessly no standards

[–] LaBellaLotta@hexbear.net 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That’s a great point actually cause I guarantee the next Graham Platner guy they try and run will be an actually bloodthirsty chud

[–] la_tasalana_intissari_mata@hexbear.net 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

this guy is already a bloodthirsty chud

[–] LaBellaLotta@hexbear.net 7 points 16 hours ago

Trueeee true true

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 15 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

He's an Obvious Plant who will no doubt be the next death-to-the-poor / Fetterman. He will most likely have a staffer incident (womanizer violent Nazi) if not an outright Nazi / imperalist carrer despite pinky swearing he's a changed man.

[–] Ildsaye@hexbear.net 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm continually surprised that people can ready theory and still look for "the left" in the Dems, and still have room to be repeatedly surprised that it isn't there. Is it really so shocking that most of our work has not in fact been done for us, and that the ones actually furthering the socialist cause are doing so in relative obscurity? If the algorithm brings something or someone to my attention, I find it's a sound policy assume it's hostile until proven otherwise.

[–] duderium@hexbear.net 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I don’t think anyone who has read even a little marxist theory is supporting platner.

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 10 points 17 hours ago

you'd be surprised... A lot of people don't actually engage with a text as a whole and instead just read sentence by sentence. They then piece it back together from what they remember reading after.

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

he's a butcher. nothing else really matters. i don't care if he promises the sky and all the stars in it, he massacred innocent people for fun. the only discussion that should be had about people like platner is "pit or rope?"

[–] LaBellaLotta@hexbear.net 2 points 14 hours ago

Yeah I respect this argument and I truly don’t bother articulating it for my own mental health more than anything else. Maybe he’ll surprise us all!

Big heaping helping of doubt on that unfortunately. That’s the Democrats for you! Thugs and crooks all the way down with a few nice guys to grease the wheels. Kinda like a mafia in that sense!

It’s like trying to win a revolution by reforming the mafia from the inside.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it's rope, right? I'm not fucking digging that shit. Come on now.

You're supposed to make him dig the pit at gunpoint how-compelling

[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The present moment in "left politics" in America is driving me insane. I had thought that the people who constituted the mainstream of what could be called 'the left' were starting to clue in to the fact that the Democrats are without any shadow of a doubt the Enemy and can't be relied upon for anything other than backstabbing, but watching the people who have stood up to bat for Platner has made me feel like the last 10 years have been collectively forgotten, or never mattered

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

hasan wouldnt have his gigantic platform on twitch dot tv if he were genuinely radical. same for the rest of the "mainstream left". that's what it all comes down to in the end.

[–] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I know you're right, and this is probably naive on my part, but while I knew that Hasan, and by extension, the rest of "DSA" types, were never highly radical, I had gotten my hopes up that if there were anything genuine happening, that there were some genuine learning from lessons happening. Evidently not.

the problem with the current generation of "leftists" is that they don't want to bite the hand that feeds them. that is, they want to keep imperialism but they don't like how the spoils are distributed. that means they'll do stupid shit like align themselves with actual nazis in congress in the hopes that they'll kill Other People, not them. the obvious problem with that is the ingroup always shrinks and rarely grows. and as capitalism grows increasingly volatile, the ingroup shrinks more and more often and grows less and less often. the new deal liberals will never learn because the core of their ideology is the maintenance of imperialism but working better for them. it's the same reason leftist men are so chauvinistic. especially hasan. they hate being oppressed, but they don't mind being the oppressor. but at least hasan sometimes doesn't support the worst of the US war machine.

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 20 hours ago

he makes "the left" look bad because he's a war criminal who wants to renationalize military production to make it more efficient but in reality i spend way too much time thinking about electoral politics for the amount of good it does. i'd be better off talking about reality tv than spending another second talking about graham hitner.

[–] daniyeg@hexbear.net 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

i don't like him he's a "kill more efficiently" kind of guy, i think progressives will be disappointed in him. putting that aside though all this discourse only helps his opponent which is guaranteed to be worst. im not a "lesser of two evils" guy, it's just that republicans keep talking about him and progressive libs keep defending him and people here keep spamming dunks on the libs. it's all very tiring and it's not even helping us so why would people keep dunking on progressives is beyond me.

load more comments
view more: next ›