this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
634 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

20690 readers
1811 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 106 points 3 days ago (15 children)

My mate Anna has a great archive of papers. Look her up some time!

[–] morto@piefed.social 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

are the papers from annas archive redundant with scihub, or are they from a different source?

[–] pmk@piefed.ca 23 points 3 days ago

Scihub is one of Annas sources iirc.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Papers in Anna's archive are mostly from sci-hub. There's something not available on sci-hub, but not much.

Real problem is that sci-hub was the organization doing the archival on large scale and it is now dead.

[–] morto@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not exactly dead, but on a stale due to a legal dispute. However, they have started a new project that fits a legal grey-area called sci-net where people can ask for or help others get access to papers by getting them from their institutional login and sharing on the platform. Not as practical as sci-hub, but better than nothing and less prone to be taken down

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have seen that, but did not understand how to sign up.

[–] morto@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Looks like there's some cripto shit in there now to get an invite... It wasn't there last time I tried. now I'm not recommending it anymore

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 21 points 3 days ago
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 61 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The fact that public funds go to research only for everything that those funds becoming privatized is a fucking crime.

No grant should be given to any research if the results aren't published on an open journal.

No grant should be given if any marketable discovery becomes privatized

I am still fucking pissed that most countries used public funds to develop a covid vaccine then gifted them to private for profit corporation. Same for basically every medical development.

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Many countries' funding agencies require open access publications for work based on their funding. However, open access fees are insanely high in some journals (e.g. around $12k for the higher impact factor Nature journals)...

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

that's also bullshit, I reviewed papers for publication. it's free labour, hosting a pdf is nearly free.

there's no justification.

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 4 points 3 days ago

Oh yeah, those price tags are insane. They're making crazy profits of public money thanks to hiring schemes based on impact factors :/

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We need national journals that are free for all people to read and mandate publication through them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] Maroon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I avoided commenting on this because this makes me very angry. What they did to that boy was fucking disgusting.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

You can blame Ghislaine Maxwell's dad for creating the entire beast. He is literally to blame for all of it.

[–] fatcat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Urgh…. My fucking god, that made me so angry.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

I still can't read it without tearing up

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I see capitalism is going as well for the scientific community as it is for the rest of us.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

closed access publications are still the majority, but at least in my field there is practically always a preprint available and the tendency to migrate to open access journals is there. i hope it will stay

[–] sharktoes@lemmy.zip 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I’ve heard of a lot of scientists using the dark web just to access research articles “illegally” lol

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you mean Sci-hub, then yeah that's completely normal. I've used Sci-hub to access my own article once when I had lost access to the published version.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'd rather use sci-hub than institutional access when the article is available. Fuck publishers.

Really hope someone comes up, recognizes how much public research money is wasted on this bullshit and sets up a public publisher directly funded by research funds which allows people to publish and read freely.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"the dark web" is police fascist fearmongering for tech that lets people access the internet from censored countries

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The dark web is a specific section of the *deep web that can be accessed only using specific software configurations or authorizations

The name make sense because it's in fact hidden, dark and makes quite a bit of sense, the problem is that dark things do make people quite a bit scared and that was then weaponized

And i say that because i don't want to go against whatever you said but to expand on the (in my opinion, too) simplistic view you shared

*the deep web is that huge chunk of the internet that is not indexed by any search engine

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Counterpoint: it sounds super cool

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago

I mean, it is definitely not just that

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Then upload paper to SciHub and the Internet Archive

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is why i always place all important info in Supplementary Information which is almost always free of charge. except on sciencedirect. fuck them

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Directly into their vault

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Founded by Ghislaine Maxwell's father, yes, that Ghislaine Maxwell.

[–] morto@piefed.social 26 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Do your part and publish only on journals listed on doaj

load more comments
view more: next ›