this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
136 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

86814 readers
3885 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

Who would've thought consumers, in an economy propped up by an AI bubble, wouldn't exactly be risking their financial stability for last year's model bút with AI bloat- and spyware, or some extremely vulnerable folding party trick? Apple's partnership with Klarna should set off alarm bells with regards to demographic being targeted; as for the intent of the buy back programs: furthering control over the second hand market. The AI circle jerk has created the perfect conditions for this anti-ownership model, and the innovatively stale industry is sparing no time to capitalize off it (Samsung for both the consumer- and enterprise segment).

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 3 points 4 hours ago

They can buy my left nut.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

So they're coming to terms that nobody wants to buy what is basically the same kind of phone now a days for higher price... and so now they want to scam people by "upgrading" to what they think will be cheaper when in reality, it's probably not...

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 18 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I waited 8 year to get a newer phoner that was better than my previous phone in all respects at the same price. And even then it was mostly a convenience upgrade because my old phone was still working well.

Why the hell would it be worth it to lease a phone?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago
[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago

You will own nothing and like it

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If your current plan is to buy the latest and greatest phone today, sell it in two years, and then buy a new top of the line phone, then Apple's new lease program looks like an attractive option. They've priced it such that, over the course of the lease, you end up paying about the cost of purchasing the phone minus its resale value. Leasing looks convenient because it saves you from having to find a buyer.

It also keeps phones out of the secondary market, which benefits Apple. Off lease phones are used for warranty replacements, or sold as refurbished through official storefronts instead of person to person.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Once Apple's leasing program kills off a competing used phone market, they can also raise the cost of the lease to reflect that, which also benefits Apple over the longer term.

Apple would be stupid not to try leasing their phones.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

There's always going to be a robust used market for phones that were purchased outright, to be resold on a different cycle than every 2 years (plenty of rich people changing phones every year, and plenty of people replacing on a 3, 4, 5, or 6 year cycle). You can expect the market to basically settle on a curve where it depreciates along a predictable rate.

Leases don't really change that, any more than leases changed the market for used cars, or even certified pre-owned by the same dealers and organized by the same manufacturers who sell new cars.

There will be times that the predefined lease terms will unexpectedly prove to be either beneficial or detrimental to the consumer. Sometimes external factors will affect the entire used market, like currency issues, or component pricing issues (imagine if RAM prices dramatically swing again for new devices in a way that affects the value of the already-sold devices out in the world), where the predefined lease prices turn into a windfall for someone. Like in 2021 or so when expiring car leases allows the lessee to buy out the car at the end of the lease for much cheaper than the car itself was worth.

It's generally going to be a less than ideal financial decision to lease, but it also won't collapse the used device market and it won't be that far off the practice of selling your old phone when you buy a new one.

[–] RoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You should buy it. Every time. Fuck subscriptions.

[–] kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

some subscriptions are fine though, like email or a vpn.

you could argue there should be no need for a vpn but... it is what it is

[–] GaumBeist@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 hours ago

Services as subscriptions: fine. They are ongoing agreements that require an unspecifiable amount of labor, it makes sense to pay as you go.

Subscription goods? Fuck that. If I am in posession of it and responsible for maintaining it in a specific state of operation and quality, I basically own it anyway.

Charging me monthly for a pocket-sized computer with the added stipulations that the seller gets to dictate what I'm allowed to do with it, probably installs spyware on it (on top of the OEM and OS spyware), and if I break it (or otherwise violate the terms of use) I have to buy it anyway and they still get to keep it? They've basically reinvented a mix of payphones and library PCs, but more invasive and more expensive

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Lease your phone so that you have enough money to finance a pizza.

“YOU OWN NOTHING!!”

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago

And you love it!! Whether you like it or not.

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 79 points 23 hours ago

The way I read that title: Apple and Samsung stopped innovating, now sales aren't growing, so it's time for enshittification.

[–] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 97 points 1 day ago
[–] smeg@infosec.pub 28 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

The only thing prompting phone replacement for me was battery life. And nearly all phones have shit ability to replace batteries (for now - EU rules incoming).

I bought a Fairphone 6 with /e/OS. I've left Big Tech behind. And I have a phone where I can easily replace the components. I don't want to swap devices for 4-5 years, which makes ownership far more cost effective than leasing.

Also -- with leasing, what happens when the renter is done with it? E waste, just like we have today.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 6 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Biggest issue is software support. You really do not want to run your banking app on an older, unpatched Android version

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mangobanana@discuss.online 2 points 15 hours ago

No they just sell the devices to the secondary market

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eicker@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago

Subscriptions were supposed to replace cable, then software, then heated seats, now phones. Funny how every innovation somehow ends with paying forever. If your business model needs me renting hardware I already carry everywhere, maybe the product isn’t improving fast enough to justify buying it?

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

An important thing to note here is that this isn’t anything new. This is what a significant amount of people have already been doing for years through their carrier. I don’t have any statistics on hand for this, but I personally don’t know a single person who has bought their phone outright. Everyone just leases their phone through their carrier around here, and upgrades as soon as they’re allowed. Hearing people complain about their cellphone plan cost increasing or poor cell service but being unable to switch carriers until their phone is paid off is a common thing to hear, as carriers have been using their phone leasing programs as a substitute for plan contracts for awhile now.

Leasing your phone through your carrier with the ability to buy or turn it in at the end of the term has been the name of the game for a very long time. What Apple and Samsung are doing is just trying to entice you into going direct through them instead of your carrier which is actually a good thing.

If you’ve been buying your phone outright then you shouldn’t use a program like this, but if you’ve been leasing your phone through your carrier I’d actually recommend switching to just doing the same thing directly through the manufacturer since it frees you up to switch carriers whenever you want.

[–] mangobanana@discuss.online 3 points 15 hours ago

I buy my phone's on either back market or swappa. Paid half of the price for a perfectly good phone. That are guaranteed to work too

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Matth@sh.itjust.works 34 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

With smartphones current prices and componants becoming more expensive they are realizing not a lot of people will buy a smartphone costing more than 1500 dollars. Especially when hardware is now good enough and people are starting to try to keep their phone as long as possible.

Making you rent your phone allow to hide how much it's going to cost you and ensure them a steady cash income.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Serious question: How is subsiding a phone over three years and then trading it in at the end of those three years to get another phone any different from leasing ?

[–] Red_October@piefed.world 22 points 21 hours ago

No, and also fuck off with that.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 33 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I buy one smartphone per decade. Why would I want to lease it instead?

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Think of the recurring opportunity for emails about price increases and downstream shareholder value!

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

Initially I used to only buy new phones when my phone became too slow - roughly every 6-7 years. Now I get refurbished or get it from someone else for free and replace the battery. My current phone is from 2018 and still works well. Why would I replace it?

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Not beating the WEF's "you will own nothing and you'll be happy" conspiracy aren't they

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you cannot control the software on the device — including the OS — then you never bought it. You paid for it, but you did not buy it and therefore do not own it.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 8 points 19 hours ago

Or, maybe their CEOs can stick them in their asses.

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

All companies see there are more profits to be made if you let consumers pay your company monthly instead of once, while you do not let them own anything. It is disgusting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I will not rent critical items.

There has been a large push to enter a subscription for eyeglasses, the large firms here keep pushing and pushing to rent glasses.

Fuck no, I refuse to have my eyesight be dependent on having to keep paying.

Same for music, I buy all my music through iTunes, I have never used Spotify, I refuse to be put in a situation where I am in financial trouble and I loose access to my music.

This is the same crap, I need a phone to be an active member of modern society, I will not rent that access.

[–] michaelalf@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Wait, sorry, a subscription for GLASSES!? They're like $150 here if you want the name-brand ones, or covered by insurance if you don't. Insurance is basic btw, $80 a month for a family of 4 for 'basic extras'. I don't know which country you live in, but I can take a wild guess.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

In America you can have whatever the top tier of vision insurance is available to you and it’s basically a $100 off coupon for frames. I’ve never not spent $300-$400 for glasses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 18 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Maybe we just need more affordable phones.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

There were lots of affordable phones before the AI companies bought up all of the RAM and flash.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 14 points 23 hours ago

“The intent is that the user will turn in their device every 12 to 36 months because they intend to upgrade regardless.”

No, I get a new device because I've broken the last one. The ones I give back, you can't sell on the secondary market which is their intent.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't kid yourselves, the majority of people will eat this shit up

[–] PixTupy@lemmy.ml 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

That's exactly what I thought. I know so many people that just want the newest release just because "status". Most of those people I know can't actually afford it, they just prioritise it over other things.

And most of them are tech illiterate and don't use 80% of the phone's abilities.

They will love this.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago

Even without the FOMO, some people just want a working device.

It's why leasing cars is attractive to some. They don't care about the specs, they want one that works "well" and looks nice and are willing to give up nebulous "ownership"of a device that they don't know or care how it works, that they can't repair, so they can stop thinking about their choice and just always have a one available.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Maybe, if there's a way to fake every single detail then unlock the bootloader and load another OS, that is unless the GSM module dosen't has some unique ID

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 21 hours ago

No. The only innovations these days are AI. If you don’t care about that, you’ll be fine with whatever.

My iPhone is pretty current from 2024, but my Android phone from 2019 isn’t much slower or less capable. It has less storage, but it has a memory card slot. There isn’t much it can’t do that the newer iPhone can, except for generate AI slop on device.

If you need AI, they’re gonna make you pay to play. If you don’t… just chill.

[–] xSikes@feddit.online 2 points 15 hours ago

I want an essential phone. Not too basic and not too “smart”.

load more comments
view more: next ›