this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
139 points (99.3% liked)

Canada

10789 readers
1084 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
mp3@lemmy.ca
otter@piefed.ca
mp3@piefed.ca
139
Bitter feud ensues after landlord's failed attempt to raise tenants' rent 65% (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 23 hours ago by HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works to c/canada@lemmy.ca
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A New Brunswick tenant says he’s being pushed out of his rented bungalow as retribution for complaining about his landlord, but his landlord says she’s the victim of an unfair tenancy tribunal ruling that is preventing her from using the unit to house family.

Jonathan King and his landlord, Ashmin Goolab, have been embroiled in a bitter year-long dispute involving a notice of a 65 per cent rent increase, a failed eviction attempt, and claims that the unit is needed to house Goolab's mother-in-law.

King, who lives in Chipman, said Goolab is trying to force him and his wife out of their affordably priced bungalow in an effort to circumvent New Brunswick's rent cap, and as retribution for a complaint he made about being given improper notice to alter their lease.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheMcG@lemmy.ca 31 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I’m also noticing the owners said they are bleeding cash. But they bought 7 units (in 4 buildings) for 295,000. Assuming 0 down and 5% apr that just north of 1700 a month. So this one renter paying 727 is nearly half of their mtg.

Even if we say expenses and upkeep adds 50% to their monthly outlay, their costs are covered at 4 units rented…

I’m not exactly anti landlord but this screams rent seeking crocodile tears.

[–] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I wasn't aware anywhere in Canada allowed zero down for residential housing. CMHC usually requites at least 5%, and that's for personal housing only. Which means the numbers would work out to even lower monthly payments.

[–] TheMcG@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago

They don’t really allow 0 down. But It is possible. I went with 0 down just to give the landlord some grace because realistically I was already sure they were misleading on the costs.

[–] rozodru@pie.andmc.ca 9 points 10 hours ago

"we're bleeding money" so lets get my mother-in-law who is already in a long term care facility to move in and not pay a dime which will end up costing us MORE in the long run as she'll need to be cared for.

But you own 7 other units, why not just sell one or two of those if you're "bleeding money".

I just wish people would be honest every now and again and simply say "We make a lot of money but we want to make more."

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 17 points 15 hours ago

If she's "bleeding money" she can sell one of the seven units she owns.