this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
139 points (99.3% liked)

Canada

10789 readers
699 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A New Brunswick tenant says he’s being pushed out of his rented bungalow as retribution for complaining about his landlord, but his landlord says she’s the victim of an unfair tenancy tribunal ruling that is preventing her from using the unit to house family.

Jonathan King and his landlord, Ashmin Goolab, have been embroiled in a bitter year-long dispute involving a notice of a 65 per cent rent increase, a failed eviction attempt, and claims that the unit is needed to house Goolab's mother-in-law.

King, who lives in Chipman, said Goolab is trying to force him and his wife out of their affordably priced bungalow in an effort to circumvent New Brunswick's rent cap, and as retribution for a complaint he made about being given improper notice to alter their lease.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Fuck these landlords

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

FUCK LANDLORDS

[–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 60 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Her story with her in-laws gets a little sympathy, right up until she's complaining that the tenant is doing all these things to her and she "didn't do anything".

You served him illegal rent increase notices and you tried to evict him! That's not nothing! All the tenant has done is get the regulator in the loop, and the regulator has repeatedly said, "yeah, you can't do that." Flawed as they sometimes are, we have laws like these for a reason.

[–] TheMcG@lemmy.ca 31 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

I’m also noticing the owners said they are bleeding cash. But they bought 7 units (in 4 buildings) for 295,000. Assuming 0 down and 5% apr that just north of 1700 a month. So this one renter paying 727 is nearly half of their mtg.

Even if we say expenses and upkeep adds 50% to their monthly outlay, their costs are covered at 4 units rented…

I’m not exactly anti landlord but this screams rent seeking crocodile tears.

[–] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I wasn't aware anywhere in Canada allowed zero down for residential housing. CMHC usually requites at least 5%, and that's for personal housing only. Which means the numbers would work out to even lower monthly payments.

[–] TheMcG@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 hours ago

They don’t really allow 0 down. But It is possible. I went with 0 down just to give the landlord some grace because realistically I was already sure they were misleading on the costs.

[–] rozodru@pie.andmc.ca 9 points 8 hours ago

"we're bleeding money" so lets get my mother-in-law who is already in a long term care facility to move in and not pay a dime which will end up costing us MORE in the long run as she'll need to be cared for.

But you own 7 other units, why not just sell one or two of those if you're "bleeding money".

I just wish people would be honest every now and again and simply say "We make a lot of money but we want to make more."

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 17 points 12 hours ago

If she's "bleeding money" she can sell one of the seven units she owns.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 57 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I’d give half a consideration to the landlord but they live thousands of km away from the rental unit and mom (they’re claiming is going to move in) is in a care facility.

They saw an opportunity to make cash and now they get what they get. Sounds like a good situation. Long term tenants. But these people needed more!

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 36 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I rented a house below market. They didn’t raise the rent the entire 3 years I was there. They said they’d rather have it rented to quality people longer than have people in and out chasing the highest rate. Best landlord I’ve had.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

I rented out my house while I was working out of town, I had exactly the same attitude. I just wanted someone that wasn't going to trash the place, so I found someone that wasn't an asshole and gave them a deal for a few years.

I had another place years before that where I thought I was giving someone a similar deal and they paid me back by absolutely gutting the place, even pulled the copper plumbing out of the walls. Cost me tens of thousands even after insurance. I had trust issues after that bullshit.

I know Lemmy hates landlords, but the fucking shit I've seen from renters would stagger people's minds. Had a place where the kids wrote on all the walls with Sharpies and the carpet was covered with orange koolaid stains that wouldn't clean out, had to tear out all the carpets.

I knew a guy that rented a place to a RCMP and when he went in there one day to fix something, he found a stack of used diapers at the bottom of the basement stairs where they were tossing them for several weeks. Couldn't evict them for that, had to give full notice because the board sided with the cop.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

People are weird.

Had a neighbour who just left the basement door open and threw a bag of dog food on the floor for their dog and left for three weeks. I didn’t know what was going on or I’d have called someone - anyone. They were homeowners.

Over COVID I heard the apocryphal stories of support payments going out and landlords getting stiffed as they watched new TVs being delivered. I don’t believe a lot of that, though.

I do think that short of a serious effort to acquire, build, maintain, and expand public housing, small scale landlords are an important part of society. But they need a lot of controls and limits, and tenants likewise need to have reasonable respect for the property. It’s not always the case but I feel a small scale landlord is better positioned to be (and certainly isn’t always, as in this case) connected to the community than BlackRock.

It would be nice to have a public record for tenants and landlords to share warnings about bad behaviour, but that sort of thing gets corrupted so quickly.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

That one reminds me of a place my dad went in to rehabilitate for the credit union my mother worked for that had repossessed it. Former owners had left the dogs in one of the bedrooms, presumably all the time for a couple years. There was six inches of dogshit on the floor, only spot clear was where they opened the door to be able to throw more dogfood, all the empty bags were in there as well.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 9 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, there are assholes on both sides of the landlord tenant dealings.

I saw a reddit post once of a tenant complaining the landlord was withholding the damage deposit due to new stove top needed. The tenant was looking for sympathy and shared a photo of the stove top. It was the glass top style and looked like the tenant had claned it for a few years by scrubbing the surface with 40 grit sandpaper and used angle grinders on the baked on part.

A family member managed a low income building:
There were tenants who removed all the plastic switch plates and plug covers, and pulled all the baseboard and door jamb frames off.

One had a closet full of garbage and human feces. Toilet worked fine.

One had a water leak they never reported and the entire lower kitchen cabinets looked like it was being eaten by an alien tentecle creature made of black mold.

People just aren't well, whether its a tenant or a shitty money grabbing landlord

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 6 points 18 hours ago

Oh damn, I’ve never heard of someone gutting the house! That must’ve been quite the shock.

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 34 points 19 hours ago

Landlords are leeches.

That being said, Blaine Higgs, our former Premier, has removed all tenant protections last year. While our current (more competent) government brought a lot of them back, the leeches feel empowered, like we took something for them for basic regulation to protect renters.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

"Ashmin Goolab says she wants Jonathan King and his wife out of their bungalow, so that her mother-in-law can eventually live there."

Sounds like you should have used that property as a dwelling rather than fuck up the housing market by converting into a rental for easy money. Get fucked landlord scum

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 18 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

She bought it with the renters already in there. She didn't convert it to a rental.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

And instantly jacked up the rent beyond what was legal. And when that failed tried to evict the tenant and when that failed waited the requisite amount before issuing another eviction also they can make more money on the property.

I don't fucking ever want to hear about "impoverished landlords" they can get fucked.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

While I acknowledge my lazy reading of the article, I feel like this fact makes her even less justified to want to use it for her MIL. Now it just sounds like she should sell the property and use those proceeds to buy a place for the MIL.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Yeah that shit's just an excuse. The two other properties she owns evacuated in response to her jacking up the price. She has plenty of properties in which to house her mother-in-law. This is just a shitty underhanded tactic to circumvent the legal process.