506
submitted 1 month ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 189 points 1 month ago

FYI Texas has been marked as a "do not travel" state on Erin Reed's trans risk map: https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/final-pre-election-2024-anti-trans

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 1 month ago

I think that was inevitable unfortunately...

[-] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 month ago

I'm in one of the worst states, I'm scared about where things are going ...

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

I go through Oklahoma just to skip Texas when driving cross country. Oklahoma is preferable to Texas. Yeesh.

[-] grysbok 21 points 1 month ago

I have a trans teenage cousin in Texas. We're not close, but I worry. All I can really do is let him and his mom know I exist in a "safe" state and hope they reach out if they decide to leave.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 156 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Despite what the law might say, there's no evidence whatsoever that letting trans people use their preferred bathroom causes any "injury or harm" to cis people.

To the contrary, there is evidence that restricting bathroom access is harmful to trans people - and cis people too, like Jay, a cis woman who was harassed in a bathroom after being mistaken for a trans person.

Even if they use the "right" restroom trans people are in danger of being harassed all the same if they pass too well: https://www.advocate.com/news/2022/7/12/trans-man-brutally-assaulted-using-womens-restroom-campground

Damned if you do, and damned if you don't. The point of laws like this isn't to protect cis women and girls, it's just to cause as much suffering as possible, because that's all Republicans care about.

[-] valek879@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 month ago

Also there is evidence that it is harmful to cis people. Especially cis women who might be queer or straight or gender nonconforming or not. These fuckwads always forget trans men exist and just harass women more with this shit. They don't give a fuck off you're trans or not, it's about control. And their especially interested in controlling women.

It's also directly tied to fascism. Eco points to Machismo in point 12 of Ur-Fascism. "[Fascists hold] both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality." Meaning it's not just women, trans women, gay men, people outside of traditional 1940s gender roles, but it also includes straight, cis men who just don't seem to be straight and cis enough.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago

harmful to trans people.

And there's the true intent of the Republican legislators.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What, we're supposed to let them use the restroom that matches their identity just because it's the moral right thing to do, costs us nothing, and the alternative harms everyone!? Sounds like someone is WOKE!!!

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago

Despite what the law might say, there's no evidence whatsoever that letting trans people use their preferred bathroom causes any "injury or harm" to cis people.

Can confirm: Having shared many a bathroom with trans folks and I have managed to survive unharmed. Who would have thunk?

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

I was once in a public bathroom. Just when i was about to wash my hands, a women walked in. I was shocked, i looked around and saw that there were urinals, so the lady was in the wrong bathroom, not me. We laughed and then we both left. That was i close one, i tell you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 83 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Trans identity supersedes all law, or medical context, or any other bullshit justification for dehumanizing anyone experiencing any form of Gender Dysphoria.

You as a person reading this have value. Just by your very sentience you have worth. You are loved.

We will overcome this moment in our history eventually, we may not all live to see it happen but we will. I know that's an atom of relief in a sea of pain. Don't let this bullshit dim your shine.

I love each and every one of you.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago

Pop Quiz:

Which bathroom should he use?

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago

As long as it's not my stall, I don't care

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

He can use mine

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Pssshhhhh!!!! Look at this bourgeoisie mother fucker over here, refusing to share their stall with others!

Selfish. Yes, that's the word!

The common working man poops on the left half of the toilet, and a stranger from the streets poop on the right half! AND THEY BOTH HATE THE YANKEES!!!

Because fuck the Yankees. Can't believe I have to cheer for the god damn Dodgers ......

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 31 points 1 month ago

Whichever he want to use. Period.

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Just like everyone else.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

That's OBVIOUSLY a Woman and should use my Daughter's Bathroom!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I've done things like this when people do the 'trans women make "real" women feel uncomfortable in locker rooms' argument.

"So you're saying women would be more comfortable with that guy changing next to them?"

They don't really have an argument against that part.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

The one with the toilet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 72 points 1 month ago

too many taps to get to rejecting cookies so I’ll save you the click: Odessa, Texas is the city

[-] chaitae3@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

I was about to ask, what's with the privacy policy of that site? How can a website that focuses on an oppressed minority be so shitty about their personal data?

I'm not telling your community what to do, but this seems very unsafe und unwise to use.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JonEFive@midwest.social 55 points 1 month ago

Some of us remember the coed bathroom featured on the hit 90s show Ally McBeal. It seemed like a progressive but not so far fetched idea at the time. So WTF are we doing still arguing about this 25 years later? These bathroom nazis need to get a grip.

[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

The real answer. Skip the whole gender thing if it's an issue. Certainly public restrooms being ungendered entirely won't be a problem, who knows why we have it this way...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago

Here is the names and photo of the Odessa city council.

https://www.odessa-tx.gov/670/City-Council

Here is the mayor.

https://www.odessa-tx.gov/Directory.aspx?EID=112

I think it's definitely worth observing the city hall restrooms in case they are using the one that doesn't fit their gender so you can collect that bounty.

And remember, you don't have to make sure, you know one when you see one.

[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Each and every one of those fuckers looks like they're in a retail store about to demand to speak to someone's manager.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 month ago

"Both sides are the same."

[-] felix@pnw.zone 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Any allies game to go to the mayor's office and conduct a shit-in?

Can't legally use a bathroom? Let's go on the floor.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I can legally shit in any room. I even have a card somewhere licensing me to do so. My shits are the stankiest. I can't make it to Odessa until 11/1 (i have an appointment today) but I will gladly drop a deuce directly in his office.

edit: i just got home from my appointment I need a flight to odessa if we're gonna do this

edit: I've been saving up. It's gonna be a très

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

There should be a name for this. "The constituent letter" or "The Pelosi kiss" or maybe "The MAGA crayon."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Drusas@fedia.io 28 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Johnathan Gooch, communications director for Equality Texas, told the Texas Tribune, “It’s a very aggressive way to alienate trans people from public life, and I think it is counter to the spirit of friendship that most Texans embody.”

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] _bcron_@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Step 1: Identify as cat

Step 2: Turn yourself in

Step 3: Claim 10,000 bucks

Step 4: No crime was committed, goto 1

[-] unphazed@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Cool, they got a useless law to "protect" children. Where is the law that protects them in churches/camps/etc?

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Why would they do that? These laws are there to convince ma and pa dipshit that child predators are trans people not a group that’s not open or openly or formally organized and consists of people in all strata of society. In short these laws are to protect the pedos in power from suspicion

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago

While the bounty is set to a minimum of $10,000, there is no cap on how large the bounty can be.

[-] tilefan@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago

is there an easy way for us to abuse this system to get ourselves paid a bunch of money?

[-] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago

Call in every dude who enters the bathroom. Surely one of them will get you paid and the rest will sure be happy to be checked in whatever barbaric method I'm sure they've planned out.

Stupid laws like this assume that it's only 'perverted men' who want to put on dresses and don't actually have any thoughts grounded in reality. Every single time a law like this gets enacted it's the job of everyone to waste as much government funding as possible so they quickly rethink their stupid bigoted schemes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

statutory damages in an amount of not less than $10,000

Fuck, its a minimum fine of $10,000 every time you have to pee. Wtf

[-] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Out of curiosity what's their fine for regular public indecency, like, urinating in an alley? I'd imagine it's literally cheaper for a trans person there to piss on the side of city hall than it is a regular god damn restroom

What an awful little shitville

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Maybe that's their plan, to get trans people on the sex offender list because they peed in public.

I think it's illegal in some countries to deny someone to pee.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

I don't want to post the "Da Fuck ya doing over there"-meme again. But what the hell.

[-] Gingernate@programming.dev 15 points 1 month ago

I used to live in Odessa. It's a shit hole. Glad to be out of there

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
506 points (97.6% liked)

News

23422 readers
2635 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS