this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
636 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

15788 readers
1607 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The american voters have really outdone themselves this time

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Wouldn't that involve them causing autism to prove it does?

"I'm autistic because I was a test subject for a government op..."

bruh...

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

Plot twist: they scale up the study nationwide, offering free flu vaccines to anyone who "volunteers" for the study as long as they take an autism test before and after.

[–] bradd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Honestly, I think this is awesome.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

All because of one debunked research paper fuck long ago. Damn did that do so much damage

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Th3ry will continue to search until they find the answer they want

[–] misteloct@lemmy.world 32 points 21 hours ago

WaPo strikes again with a plausibly deniable disinformation title, using the word "skeptic" wrong on purpose. I expect nothing less from Bezos.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's no such thing as a "vaccine skeptic".
Skeptic implies that they could have their opinion swayed if presented with evidence. The fact that they're still "skeptical" despite literal mountains of evidence shows that they only call themselves "skeptics" because it makes them sound reasonable, when in reality if they could have been swayed by reason they would have changed their minds a long time ago.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 5 points 15 hours ago

they try to downplay anti-vaxxers, thats what they really are, this include vaccine hesitency.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 15 hours ago

pro-worm but agaisnt vaccines.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 11 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Someone please create a AI video of a debate with Trump about vaccines, where he gets dunked.

If they don't play fair, we don't have to either.

[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Forget the serious debate videos—his supporters aren't watching those, and even if they did, they wouldn't care. You want to make a dent? You go after the ego.

Picture this: an endless stream of totally "realistic" phone-recorded AI videos of Trump playing golf. He lines up the putt—misses. Tries again—air ball. It's literally an inch away now—misses again. Doesn’t blink, just traps it in, smirks, walks off like he nailed it. Over and over.

The key is subtlety. These can’t look staged or flashy—make them feel like someone’s nephew filmed it from the cart. Make it look like he's genuinely terrible but thinks he’s crushing it.

Then blast them everywhere. Flood the algorithm. Turn his “I’m the best at golf” schtick into a punchline.

This is how you use AI to actually take Trump down—with a thousand tiny ego papercuts.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Autism isn't a fucking defect

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Being branded atypical and living in a world built without you in mind probably affects that more than you sucking

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are less susceptible to propaganda, which authorities figures hate.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Is that why I'm cursed to see reality?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

You could also just be a skeptic.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

There was never a link to begin with. Never.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (8 children)

These people have co-opted the work "skeptic".

I grew up Orthodox and became skeptical of god's role in my life, now I'm agnostic.

My parents became "skeptical" of vaccines. Once they found their first antivax substack they are no longer "skeptical" but rather certain vaccines cause autism and covid vax causes heart attacks.

I find it hilarious (sad) they stop being skeptical once they find "proof" of their suspicions and then claim to be skeptics.

They of course have seen all the research supporting vaccines and deemed it insubmissable because it was funded by big pharma or the WHO (CHINA).

The only science they believe is the shit pushed by their "independent" researchers (crunchy influencers).

🤮

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

Don't worry, Republicans have been hard at work destroying our public education system so that people in the future won't be burdened with seeing and understanding their parents' hypocrisy for what it is.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If the word "skeptic" in the title actually meant that, this would be a good thing. It's good to be skeptic about everything until you're shown evidence. The problem here is that those folks aren't really skeptic.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

Yeah, he's a liar, not a skeptic. He's denying evidence, not demanding it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago

I hope this is a situation like the documentaries made to prove flat earth that do the opposite

[–] Indica_Jellies@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

"LET'S FIGURE OUT AND CURE AUTISM" they say as if a considerable amount of humanity's greatest inventions/discoveries aren't accredited to people across the spectrum.

[–] sircac@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Being skeptic is not bad. Not seek nor relay on scientific evidences is the problem...

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

I feel like using terms like "vaccine skeptic" for these morons is a major PR win for them. It makes it sound way more legitimate than it is. Fuck corporate media sanewashing everything going on politically right now.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Headline later...

90% of people with autism were vaccinated! Vaccines cause autism!

Actual data later

90% of the population is vaccinated. The rate of autism in the 90% and remaining unvaccinated 10% is exactly the same.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 102 points 1 day ago (6 children)

“You’ll never believe it, Mr Kennedy. According to our data, vaccines causes cancer”, he says, smiling. “Once we increased our vaccination rates, cancer became a major cause of death within 15 years. I suspect that far fewer people will die of cancer, if we simply roll our policies back

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (10 children)

They really should review dihydrogen monoxide which is continually pushed by doctors but has a 100% mortality rate! DO YOUR RESEARCH!

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] max@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With data manipulation you can prove that vaccines cause pigs to fly

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›