this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
266 points (95.9% liked)

Games

38929 readers
725 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] secret300 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well it has Denuvo... I wasn't buying that shit

[–] Hachiman@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

It's ironic that they attach third-party software to prevent piracy out of fear of losing sales, but in the end, it actually causes them to sell fewer copies. lol

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

In the UK its £70 ($95) for the base game and £100 ($135) for the full game. Bethesda go fuck yourself.

Edit: Title is somewhat dishonest, it has over 3M players. Just that most are on gamepass. Still not buying it though.

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

No less than is correct because they know the exact number they have sold.

If you've sold less than 1,000 units then you have sold a number of units that is under 1,000.

If you have sold fewer than 1,000 units you have not sold 1,000 units but you're not sure how many units you have sold just that that number didn't reach 1,000.

But they do know how many units they sold, otherwise they wouldn't know if they had sold less than 1,000 so it is "less than".

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

No, that's wrong.

The "less than" vs "fewer than" rule isn't about whether you know the exact number - it's about countable vs uncountable nouns.

Video game copies are countable, so it's traditionally "fewer than 1,000 units" regardless of whether you know the precise number sold.

That said, it's been misused so much that it's become more flexible, and "less than" with numbers is widely accepted now.

Don't take my word for it, Google it.

[–] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 197 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (17 children)
  1. It’s $80
  2. It’s on Gamespass, where I assume a lot of doom fans who might have otherwise purchased are likely to be.
  3. It’s shouldered up against Expedition 33 and Oblivion Remake, both over $20 cheaper and highly acclaimed.
  4. It’s $80
  5. (Edit) shitty DRM
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 108 points 1 week ago (7 children)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Mostly this. I’m not paying for something that comes with malware. Not for $80, $20, or $1. Nobody should pay for malware.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 127 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Seeing how they screwed over Mick Gordon, the composer for the previous two installments, I'll vote with my wallet and skip this one. My backlog is big enough as it is anyway.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 116 points 1 week ago (24 children)

meant to mislead potential players into thinking the game is successful when, in fact, it's severely underperforming behind the scenes.

Why would a player in a single-player game give a tiny shit about how popular it is? It's the investor class that cares about that; stop treating their interests as a natural good.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 93 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Marty Stratton and his denuvo riddled pos game can kindly get fukt after what he did to Mick Gordon, the composer of the banger soundtrack for Doom 2016.

https://medium.com/@mickgordon/my-full-statement-regarding-doom-eternal-5f98266b27ce

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Holy fucking shit! I live under the rock in the middle of nowhere so I've heard only some brief parts of "something wrong with DOOM Eternal music" but nothing factual. Now I gave the time to read the whole article and I'm speechless. 'Cause this is bad, really, really, REALLY bad. I feel sorry for people that have to work and live under such assholes like Marty obviously is...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nfreak@lemmy.ml 89 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

Let's see

  • The game itself takes away a lot of pieces of the formula that made 2016 and Eternal so good
  • $80 price tag
  • BDS boycott
  • Denuvo

I'm shocked that it's not selling, absolutely shocked.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Damarus@feddit.org 61 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's also 80€ in Europe. Everyone I talked to is waiting for the price to drop, including me.

[–] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's £70 in the uk, that's $95 while in the us it costs $70, which is £50. Xbox did the same thing with the new call of duty, their regional pricing is so braindead.

Historically AAA games have been £10 less than the us counter part ($60 games were £50) and making this change is so stupid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] caut_R@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I don‘t buy any digital copy of a game for over 45 bucks, doesn‘t matter what it is… I also haven‘t finished DOOM 2016 yet and haven‘t even started Eternal. Not because they‘re bad games or because I don‘t like FPSs, but because I have so much shit to play and so little time.

Competition is fierce and asking 80 bucks when I got the predecessors for less than 5 each is just not happening. Just because games cost more to produce doesn‘t magically make customers have more money and time. It‘ll make release weeks stinkers outside of your GOTYs and makes more people wait or go back to 20+ years worth of other games that aren‘t 80 bucks.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] trslim@pawb.social 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Forcing raytracing is a great way to close off a bunch of customers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 week ago

Game is 70$ on Steam US and has a very positive review. That is still too much money unless this is a game you were really looking forward to.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I would have bought it if it didn't have denuvo. I'll wait til its stripped out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nawa@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not sure about hardcore Doom fans but the game looks uninteresting to me specifically. It's like a polar opposite from Doom 2016 judging by all the videos I've seen. Don't really care about the higher price, I'd get it if I liked it but it really doesn't click for me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xangadix@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I'm one of the biggest fans of the DOOM franchise, I've played all the versions since the original one in 1993. But I don't care if I play it now or in half a year. Or a year for that matter. Never really understood why having it first matters to anyone. I'll be here when the prices drop.

I was stupid enough to buy Spacemarine 2, when it came out, at full price (mostly because I loved Boltgun so much) and that was a great lesson about how you should wait around a bit before actually buying a game. It would have been a fun game for 15 or even 20 euro, but it's not worth 70 euro. I Should have bought Helldivers, anyway 😓

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Feyd@programming.dev 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't even look at it enough to know if I'd buy it otherwise when I saw it has denuvo. Always online DRM is a hard pass for me. I haven't played the last 3 games Atlus released either and I've been playing almost every one since the ps2 era.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

As much as I love the Doom games I'm not really a fan of the $70 price tag. The Doom games are great games but it's not like they are in my top 5 favorite games or anything like that. I'll wait for a sale.

[–] Emil_Zatopek1982@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

That price was doomed.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure that’s exactly how they want it to be. If they were interested in selling games they wouldn’t put them day one on gamepass.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We went through this song and dance with Indiana Jones and Avowed, too. If this was a strategy that lost them money, they'd stop doing it. It turns out they're just fine with having tens of millions of subscribers that like the idea of getting access to games like these for, in plenty of cases, cheaper.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›