this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
393 points (92.1% liked)

Science Memes

19434 readers
856 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 74 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is kind of the best-case fantasy of what happened to introduce that DNA so let's just hope it's true for now.

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 38 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeahhh.... first thought I had when the DNA news hit was that this had pretty rapey vibes...

I don't think there was a lot of consent on offer.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I thought neanderthal males were thought to be a lot less aggressive than homo sapiens (possibly even the reason for their extinction)? Even though I suspect you could be right. I think it's possibly a mistake to apply how we are today to how our relatives were 40,000+ years ago. Also they might not have a comparable concept of rape if you go back far enough. So the personal trama, cultural implications, and psychological impact are possibly hard to analyze from a modern lense.

[–] kossa@feddit.org 15 points 5 days ago

Gotta need a time machine for that ~~sweet neanderthal pussy~~ interesting anthroplogic research.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sex doesn’t look very consensual for like 99.9% of other species…

Fairly certain even the idea of consent is part of what makes us human.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

1: Neanderthals are also humans for the purpose you're discussing, the results of higher cognitive functions. The label is actually applied to all hominins by anthropologists (note the nin and not nid)

2: A lot of tribal cultures have historically had more female autonomy than women in industrialized or preindustrial cultures. There's a lot of discussion about why that is exactly but this image of women as caveman chattel is just a lie

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] luciole@beehaw.org 38 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Where do Neanderthal women be??

A trend that continues to this day tbh

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Neanderthals were more peaceful than Homo Sapiens.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 20 points 5 days ago (6 children)

We don't actually know that. Homo Sapiens is on the whole a peaceful species, but we have a few assholes that like to kill and subjugate.

Just because our assholes outlived their assholes, doesn't mean that they were any less assholes on average than we are/were

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

hunter gatherers vs agriculturers say otherways. Mass of graves and the murdering entire family lines and clans and villages go back as far as humankind goes back. Homo sapiens are no different than any other animal—opportunistic killers like cows and horses are.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 6 points 5 days ago

Yep, the relative lack of heterogeneity in the Y-chromosome compared to mtDNA is somewhat testament to that too, but those mass grave sites are late stone age. Neanderthals predate those sites by a large margin, so it'd be hard to say that they didn't necessarily follow the same brutal history against their own kin

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

As a modern male, cannot confirm

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 days ago (5 children)

How do we know it wasn't the other way around?

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 55 points 6 days ago (1 children)

a paper came out recently. it's also possible that male humans and female neanderthals made non viable babies.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (3 children)

There is a few different potential reasons as well as sexual preference.

Genetic incompatibility - the interspecific cross could only occur one way.

Genetic bottlenecks in the neandertal lineage. A high inbred coefficient could have decreased the neandertal females overall fertility (high deleterious alleles load). This could also cause a rapid reduction in the percentage of neandertal DNA in a mixed population.

Maternal behavior - Neandertals females might not have cared for hybrid offspring appropriately. This could be for anything from milk production requirements to differences in physiological developmental rates.

[–] azi@mander.xyz 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think the idea of there being health issues in certain types of mixed families is super interesting because that almost certainly would have been noticed and lead to certain cultural practices or taboos within both species' societies.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If I had to guess the successful crosses were potentially much healthier than either parent line. Heterosis (hybrid vigor) would likely be pretty extreme in genetic lines that has been isolated by 300,000+ years of time. Of course the degree of fertility was likely lowered due to genetic distance. Once the initial cross was made however, back-crossing to either species by the hybrid would likely be much easier.

Many of those ancient stories about individuals with super strength and size etc could have likely been based upon these crosses.

The evidence is showing neadertals never truly died out. Their smaller population bred back into the modern humans who came later.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Keep in mind heterosis isn't always the result of hybridization and even then the magnitude of isolation doesn't always positively correlate. Outbreeding depression can also be the result, increasingly so when two groups are more genetically distant or when one group is already subject to heavy inbreeding depression, as the neanderthals were thought to be.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 5 points 5 days ago

This is a fantastic thread, I love this meme sub

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JayDee 16 points 6 days ago (3 children)

So, how likely is it that neanderthals and humans just lived in tribes together, and neanderthals just eventually died off within human tribes?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I bet it at least ended that way.

They died out during the last ice age when one of the big differences from previous ones they survived was the presence of homo sapiens.

I'm guessing it was from a combination of lack of space, raids, and integration (willing or not).

We (who carry it) have a small amount of Neanderthal DNA, but it's not the same DNA for all of us, it's pretty diverse, so cross breeding events between us weren't limited to just a few times.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Iirc, there's speculation that neanderthals needed something like 3000 calories per day just to sustain themselves.

We may have just survived because we can go leaner.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

One difference that I'm aware of is we were using bone needles at that point to make more advanced clothing, which would have helped in an ice age.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 15 points 5 days ago

I'm something of a Neanderthal myself.

Er... I mean... Unga bunga?

[–] romanticremedy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 days ago (5 children)
[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago

Human genome contains significant contribution from Neanderthals. Because of the location of the neanderthal genes in our genome it can only have come from male Neanderthals.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

Unga bunga bang bang

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Benign@fedia.io 16 points 6 days ago

I thought this was referencing modern dating at first 🙄

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Clan of the cave bear vibes

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

The first one was engaging but subsequent novels really felt like Auel was writing them with one hand

load more comments
view more: next ›