this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
39 points (95.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38808 readers
2383 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In person or online. Most entertaining thing to argue about? What gets you the most heated?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hypothetically, yes. Practically, no. Arguing is fun and engaging when you have a sparring partner who is sharp, engaged, and persuadable. If changing someone’s mind isn’t on the table, or if all you’re capable of doing is poorly repeating memes and headlines you’ve seen, I’m not interested.

[–] PoorYorick@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Exactly. Presenting arguments in good faith with people who are willing to accept objective views and valid factual information can be thrilling and present opportunity to learn about your own belief systems.

In practice, though, it is such a rare occurrence that you are mostly just better off banging your head against a wall.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not really. I can enjoy a debate, IF the other person is doing so in good faith. Challenging, enlightening discussions are always welcome!

Generally speaking, if one of us can’t “agree to disagree” and happily change the subject, then it won’t be a good time.

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

I disagree to agree to your point. /S

[–] Libb@piefed.social 13 points 4 days ago

I enjoy discussing and confronting ideas. I see no interest in arguing.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Who's arguing? I came in here for a disagreement!

[–] ghost9@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] TaterTot@piefed.social 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 4 days ago

No it isn't!

[–] ghost9@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] TaterTot@piefed.social 6 points 4 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

What is wrong with you, why would you come onto the internet specifically looking for a disagreement? That's so idiotic you're worse than james madison and gorson ramsay COMBINED. I hope your favorite pants turn green

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

Arguing is not contradicting everything I say.

Yes it is.

Stop that.

[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I used to, when I used to believe people could change their minds in response to a good argument. Now that I realise no one ever changes their mind because of an argument, I no longer enjoy it. Now I mostly see it as a self reinforcing public display of affiliation

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] 667@lemmy.radio 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean? Yes you do.

[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think you might be right.

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 3 points 4 days ago

That’s not what you said last time!

[–] DeepThought42@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Have you considered yes?

[–] LeapSecond@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

Arguments are fun when they're just civilized disagreements about inconsequential things. Like, architectural decisions at work are always interesting cause you may learn a thing or two and it doesn't matter if you don't convince others, it's not your product. Actual heated arguments, I tend to stay away from.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I really don't. No-one argues to convince anyone, just to state their own opinions louder.

[–] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You have developed a very sad view of the world.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

You know what? You're right.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zagam@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I used to. I'm an old school troll. I enjoy messing with people and teasing. If I can make things difficult or awkward for someone, then get both of us to laugh about it, I'm in heaven. But over the last couple of decades people take themselves more seriously or something and its harder to get people to be silly or appreciate the absurd. People don't enjoy it any more so I stopped doing it. I don't want to get people actually mad, or have them be truly upset. But yeah, I'd argue just about anything to get someone going. I'd get more and more outrageous till they finally twigged what I was doing. Then I'd do the same thing to the next person but take a different stance. Usually the first person would join in and it would just snowball.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I love messing with people/trolling but I tend to keep it to the shitpost and shower thought communities.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago

As in debate? I used to but I have less patience for it now. Its possible because I did so much of it I tire of rehashing things with folks who have not as thoroughly gone through the many things. I still am a little obsessed with the idea of truth though.

[–] TaterTot@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I enjoy it when I find out I was wrong. That moment of "oh shit!?" is awesome.

I also really enjoy arguing pedantically over fictional worlds.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I don't mind arguing, but it's fueled by my undying rage at dumbfuck assholes. Pick a lane! Sheesh.

When I can argue with someone rational who is willing to change their mind or has a reason for disagreeing with my or the foundations of my argument such that they can explain where I’ve made a mistake, I like arguing.

It’s even fun when you argue with rational people about irrational things for the fun of just pushing the limits of understanding. Like trying to debate ontological nihilism purely for the pain of trying to understand it.

However, I do not like arguing with people who are irrational, because there’s no point, and I know it, but I really feel like maybe if I just said something right they’d start believing in evidence.

It is also just very difficult to explain certain things to people who don’t understand the foundations of your reasoning.

There’s a saying that to a mathematician there are only two kinds of problems: impossible and trivial. When you’ve thought a lot about something, many foundational concepts seem trivial to you but not to outsiders. It’s very difficult to branch this gap in knowledge.

For example I had an argument about how the undecidability of the busy beaver numbers seem to disprove solipsism because something had to do the work to find them but it wasn’t me, so something other than me must exist for those few numbers we’ve calculated so far to be at my fingertips.

This argument means nothing to people who don’t know what undecidability means, and it is incredibly difficult (for me at least) to try and defend that proving something is “undecidable” in the first place is even possible to someone who’s never seen/done a formal math proof.

[–] MuttMutt@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

No, I enjoy respectful discussion and learning. There is a huge difference. When you get to the raised voices, snide remarks, and it feels like your hair is on fire the whole time it's arguing.

I lived with a woman who loved to constantly bicker and argue, sometimes to the point where there were screaming matches over stupid stuff. You didn't dare defy her. She was in a family that constantly fought and argued over pretty things. I was stuck with it and arguing with her boyfriends who 80 percent of the time were not all that bright. I hated arguing by the time I was in school.

That was my mother. When I finally left I could eat a meal and be sick, vomiting a green slime because of the constant fighting and crap. My son a few months prior had passed away at 9 days old, we had been homeless because of her decisions to not pay things, and her latest winner of a boyfriend kept picking fights with me because I was younger so obviously I knew nothing and he knew it all.

This man screwed up so many things because he could do it all. He did a brake job on a car and had to treat it apart again because he messed something else up. Not to mention he didn't torque the lug nuts. My mother's previous boyfriend would hand me a part and tell me, "the pickup needs tree water pump replaced, go do it." When I had never done one in my life without telling me how pre internet and had no problem. From around 9 to i was 18 that guy who was a former biker, maybe draftee, and spent 15 years in maximum security prison for beating the crap of of his ex and her new man then taking a TV and slamming it on the man's head nearly killing them both so also seemed to hate my guts.

I finally left not long after she got drunk and pissed off at me for something and told me how her life had been ruined because she had me.

I can't stand fighting and arguing. I can't stand taking on the phone either, my mother loved yelling and slamming them too she had the 50 foot cord and loved the cordless ones.

The only time I had fun with arguing was in WoW... have some public fight and be breezing through, then stir the pot and leave. Come back hours later and they were still at it. My favorite was for the grammar nazi's, a simple, "There, their, they're... it'll be ok." Was my favorite.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 2 points 4 days ago

Typically, no. Not in person and not online. However, winning an argument - in particular one that brings fairness or justice as a consequence - feels very rewarding. But I still don't enjoy the actual arguing part.

Discussing different points of view though, I don't always consider this arguing. As long as it remains an exchange, it is pleasant. If I have to attack and defend something personal, then no.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Only if it's about something that ultimately doesn't matter, if shit gets too serious I don't enjoy it

[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

I hate arguing and I will fight you on that one! ;)

[–] HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

No, I hate it. I find conflict repulsing. I wish people agreed on everything. But we don't live in a perfect world, so I still argue.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No but I do enjoy having conversations about topics I disagree with someone on. When things turn hostile, which I do associate with an argument, it's just not worth it.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I loved arguing and being just overall mean and negative and a cunt to people on Reddit who posted really absolute complete garbage sludge, like parroting the same tired Le Epic phrases that were already posted 20 times in the comment section before they squeezed the rubbish bin juice out of their half-a-brain cell enough to comment “pLaY StUpiD GamEs, Win…” and when they’d get mad at me for being mean I’d always have a great time.

I can’t really do that here. It’s nice. I don’t really see completely horrible dumb garbage here very often. It’s very refreshing. So I don’t really feel the need to be a cunt anymore. As much.

Also sorry for the insane run-on sentence there, but it fits how I wanted to express it from my brain hole.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Its alright, I liked it

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago

For as long as the topic is interesting and the other person is being civil about it and is actually arguing against what I'm saying and not just what they think I'm saying.

load more comments
view more: next ›