this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
151 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

876 readers
332 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 76 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Here is my budget:

War - $1,000,000,000,000

Food - $0

Please help my family is starving

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 24 points 6 days ago

Cut education and safety nets more, what could go wrong

You'll definitely win if you do that

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] agentant@hexbear.net 11 points 6 days ago

No liberal. More war money. /j

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 56 points 6 days ago (1 children)

maybe the pentagon should get a job and stop expecting handouts.

[–] znonymous@hexbear.net 32 points 6 days ago

Quit buying avocado toast and Starbucks if it ever wants to afford a down payment on a mortgage.

[–] curmudgeonthefrog@hexbear.net 48 points 6 days ago

did-someone did someone get addicted to being the global monopoly on violence

[–] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 51 points 6 days ago

Help! The money printer is out of ink and we already stole all the money we've printed so we can't buy any more! porky-point

[–] Azarova@hexbear.net 49 points 6 days ago

If I had a trillion dollars I wouldn't run out of money but I guess I'm just built different

[–] blunder@hexbear.net 48 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Eight failed audits in a row btw

[–] MeetMeAtTheMovies@hexbear.net 33 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What percentage of the misplaced money is contractors skimming the till and what percentage is projects that don’t officially exist and won’t be acknowledged for 50 years?

[–] Azarova@hexbear.net 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'd bet the grift is bigger than the black budget stuff

[–] huf@hexbear.net 17 points 6 days ago

Imagine the grift on the black budget stuff!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kristina@hexbear.net 45 points 6 days ago (1 children)

has anyone checked elon's pockets

[–] MeetMeAtTheMovies@hexbear.net 27 points 6 days ago (6 children)

You guys all know he’s not liquid like that! (translation: money is fake and he doesn’t actually have a trillion of anything)

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't know that I buy it, we better turn him upside and shake him to see what comes out.

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I propose using a juicer instead, just to be sure

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 21 points 6 days ago

Bring forth the human-sized juicero! We shall squeeze the money out of him!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 36 points 6 days ago (1 children)

defund the police means this, too

[–] agentant@hexbear.net 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They do like playing "World Police"

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 36 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Two options, reduce the quality of lives for americans further or contract the reach of the empire by closing bases and reducing water usage.

Water usage is 30-40% of US military costs.

Reducing the quality of lives for americans is a temporary bandaid, water costs are going to continue to increase so they will need to either keep doing that over and over until something in the population snaps or they will have to contract the empire. They have no other choice.

When the British empire faced the same problem, it contracted its reach with cost reductions and closure of non-essential bases. I believe the US empire will do the same.

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 25 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Water usage is 30-40% of US military costs.

Water would be a fraction of “operational and maintenance costs” which at least in 2019 figured as 40% of the total DoD budget[^1], so 40% of that would be 16% of the overall DoD budget. I tried corroborating the 30-40% figure for water, but I’m not coming up with anything concrete. I’m thinking that it is situational, and possibly outdated information from when the US was still in Afghanistan. A lot of the cost comes from not only transport, but security for the transport, which naturally is much higher in an active combat zone compared with a base in a friendly country.

Side note, I had a good laugh learning about “Marine Corps Energy Assessment Team (MEAT)”[^2] while googling this. Only in Burgerland

[^1]: 1. Wikipedia

[^2]: 2. CNAS

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I tried corroborating the 30-40% figure for water

It's on page 27 of this doc: https://climateandsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/implications-of-climate-change-for-us-army_army-war-college_2019.pdf

Researchers at Ft. Lee, VA, with the Combined Arms Support Command (CASCOM), in the Petroleum and Water Department, believe water generation is one of the leading fields for material approaches in the Capability Needs Assessment Process. The objective is to develop technologies enabling a logistics transformation in the area of water sustainment by reducing the water distribution and storage load. Without technology advances, water remains 30%-40% of the force sustainment requirement.

This covers all military operations abroad. So basically 30-40% of everything in the empire outside the US' borders.

This was the US military's own assessment of the upcoming problem in 2019. That problem is now beginning to take shape. This report itself frames it as a problem they either need new technology for to solve, or it says the military itself will collapse. Now you and me both know they're never going to let "collapse" happen, so the obvious outcome is that they're going to have to shrink their operations, it is the only option they will have.

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

That’s an incredible statistic. Then taking my 16% estimate from above, and considering DoD is about 14% of total federal budget, then about 2% of every taxpayer dollar is spent on shipping Aquafina to chuds in the desert, if my math is right. (Probably not? Since this is budget, not revenue (shrug))

More nominative determinism: the source within your source is a man by the name of “Burden”:

  1. Burden, Jr., Charles E. Team Leader for Petroleum, Water and Material Handling Equipment, Combined Arms Support Command. Telephone interview by author, April 10, 2018.
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

That’s an incredible statistic.

Yeah it's basically what fuels my constant belief that the US military is operating on borrowed time. They can't stop these events happening, everything in this report is entirely outside of their control. The only solutions are magic technology that doesn't exist, more money (from where without causing domestic problems?), or contraction. Both of the real solutions will end the US and the one that causes domestic problems is only a temporary delay to a problem that will continue to grow.

They have no options. It's an extremely good situation and you can bet China's policy of sitting and waiting is built around it. They can only get weaker. Consider also the implications of this for revolutions that climate change is going to cause - the ability to project power to influence those revolutions will also be much weaker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net 8 points 6 days ago

60%[^1] of the DoD budget is staff and the staff are composed of 50-60% water ^2 ergo ~30% of DoD budget is water.

[^1]: made-it-the-fuck-up

[–] deforestgump@hexbear.net 31 points 6 days ago

Maybe they should try eating cereal for dinner?

[–] red_giant@hexbear.net 20 points 6 days ago

USMIC vs. Billionaire profits, fight

[–] microfiche@hexbear.net 28 points 6 days ago
[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Odds are this is just a ploy to get even more money.

[–] agentant@hexbear.net 13 points 6 days ago

Please we promise we need more money for this new weapon please we need it to fight China Russia oooo scary right your scared right please be scared give us money so you won't be scared anymore

[–] agentant@hexbear.net 20 points 6 days ago

No way, the place that's given unlimited money while never passing an audit and that obviously just embezzles comical quantities of money is out of money????? /s

The DoD is just how the US fulfills it's two favorite things: Murdering children and stealing.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

the pentagon is embezzling money*

[–] Maeve@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Pallets of cash" went missing in Iraq 2.0.

[–] Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net 21 points 6 days ago

Go woke

Go broke

[–] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Proof the pentagon has developed a black hole gun and are throwing all the money into it

[–] AvocadoVapelung@hexbear.net 17 points 6 days ago
[–] duderium@hexbear.net 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Frantically searching the comments to see if anyone else has made a joke about avocado toast.

Edit: fuuuuuck I’m too late.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thats what happens when you vote in knaves and thieves.

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 39 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This implies that under the capitalist 'democratic' process people other than knaves and thieves could be voted in

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I mean when its just a village raising hands in the forum, yes. This shit? I dont even know what this is but it is NOT by the people thats for fucken sure. Its suffering made manifest to spread anguish far and wide. Or maybe eldritch farts, Idk.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

I mean when its just a village raising hands in the forum, yes.

I just want to say that my own experience of local politics is that you definitely get knaves and thieves even in the smallest places. Without a focus on ideological education you can get small groups of absolute tyrants and when they work together they run rings around people who can't dedicate enormous amounts of time specifically to understand what social and political games they're playing and combatting them.

This isn't just a bourgeois democracy thing either. Even in China the reputation of local level governance is absolutely awful compared with the reputation national governance has. Local has the reputation of being filled with corrupt dickheads and small tyrants. The way some of my Chinese friends describe it sometimes resembles the HOA behaviour the americans complain about.

I think there is a great deal of ideological education necessary to make sure that local things work out right. Maybe absolutely tiny tiny groups of under 50 people this gets better? Idk. I'm not sure participation at that scale can be efficient in a society of millions though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 10 points 6 days ago (6 children)

If capitalists (e.g. local petite bourgeois) take control of the village, it will rapidly lose the ability to elect people other than running dogs, and if they don't control the village then it doesn't apply to what the person said.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago

Trump doesn't have time left for his more usual slow grift, so he's probably put his stealing into high gear.

[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 7 points 6 days ago

go anti woke go broke

[–] Civility@hexbear.net 10 points 6 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›