this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
171 points (99.4% liked)

memes

23860 readers
376 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 7 points 6 days ago

I'm living proof that you can recover from being this guy.

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is Guns Germs, and Steel good? Way back before I knew anything about politics I thought it sounded neat

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To quote myself talking about someone using it as a source in their youtube video:

"Guns Germs and Steel" a notorious pop-history book that has recieved a lot of negative criticism from historians for its inaccurate and infantilising depictions of native American civilisations, amongst other things, painting the conquest of the Americas as an "us or them" style thing, portraying it as "inevitable" and making absurd and insulting claims about native American groups, like the Inca being too stupid to know what an ambush was, because they didn't have horses.

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

bruh... from the description i thought it was going to be at least somewhat related to historical materialism or sociology in general

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago

Nope, it gives the impression of that, but it is one of those books that will actively lead you to understanding less of history after reading it, while thinking you understand more than the average person.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If i ever learned anything from channels like History, it's that the anglo historians are full of overwhelming regret that nazis had lost.

[–] Yllych@hexbear.net 64 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Having above average knowledge of WWII military technology :

is-this is this historical understanding

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

I love to talk about the Russian tanks though. And Stalingrad.

[–] EstraDoll@hexbear.net 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh fuck off, you didn't have to use the best civ game out of seven to call ~~me~~ this guy out like that 😭

[–] Ehrmantrout@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had to check if Dan Carlin and Hardcore History were the same and they are. Literally every Reddit post about history circa 2017-18 would talk about Dan Carlin. I genuinely thought it was some astro turf movement.

[–] yellowfattybean@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

Just the echo chamber effect

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago

This is just reddit

[–] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 week ago

Did yuo no taht teh Black slaves were sold to the Americans by there African kings? :grillman:

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago

MODS MODS MODS I'M BEING DOXXED

[–] abc@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

i think japan would have surrendered

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago

Japan was already surrendering, actually. but it was to the Soviets

They tried twice, one directly to USA but it was refused, and second time they asked USSR for mediation but USSR also refused since they were bound by Tehran promise to attack Japan and were not neutral.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've always thought it would have resulted in two Japans, like how Korea and Germany got split. But I have no idea where the socialists in Japan would have gained power. I know they existed though, like that guy who got killed with a sword on TV.

[–] GoodGuyWithACat@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

That's what Truman and co feared, which is why they staked their claim with the atom bomb. Even against the advice of MacArthur.

[–] yellowfattybean@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As a guy who knows a lot about history, this was partially accurate to me at like age 23

[–] MidnightPocket@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Used to work with this guy.

He also thought that the Kurds working as US proxies were the coolest guys in the world.

[–] yellowfattybean@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

Second only to the gurhkas

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are these specific weapons (and one plane) actually picked for a reason or is it just to reinforce this idea of "Guy who thinks history is just battles and wars" kind of thing?

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think, it is Mauser 98k rifle, although I'm not sure.

[–] edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think its a garand. Doesn't have a bolt handle like the 98k one


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[–] Piltdowntown@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The average person is paradoxically far too knowledgeable for their own good, specifically because they are not knowledgeable enough. The ideal is to be highly educated, but being totally uneducated is far preferable to being slightly educated. Being highly educated allows you to be right. Being slightly educated allows you to be totally wrong while having some scraps of "backup" for your claims. The midwit is far more dangerous than the totally uneducated, because the midwit can be far more effectively weaponized against Communism due to their appearance of "correctness" brought about by knowing some irrelevant trivia.

[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

Not enough paradox games

[–] MeetMeAtTheMovies@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I thought not invading Russia during winter was genuinely good advice. Did I miss something?

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's simplistic and lacks nuance. Russia in the spring and early summer is very muddy, and would slow down an invasion more than the winter, and autumn turns to winter very quickly, so there's only really about a month and half of the year that you could actually "invade", but it is borderline impossible to actually organise and carry out an invasion of such a massive country in such a short amount of time.

It's spoken by a lot of these guys as a Truism rather than an actual examination of Russia's material conditions.

[–] ryepunk@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

inconceivable they studied all the brightest military minds!

[–] EstraDoll@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago

The problem with (not) invading Russia in the winter is twofold really. It's so damn cold that invading during winter is a bad idea, but that's true to a lesser extent just about anywhere. The second problem is that Russia is so goddamn massive that you can't reasonably invade all or even part of it before winter sets back in. Operation Barbarossa started in June

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

I mean the most famous case of a successful invasion of Russia is the Mongols, who did in fact invade during the winter. So that "advice" only works in specific contexts and times, it's not like some self-evident Fact like these folks love to parrot.

[–] duderium@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

I think it goes back to the idea that liberals and fascists believe that the Nazis only failed to conquer the USSR because of the winter, not because of the superior Soviet society they were attempting to destroy. What these modern geniuses fail to recognize is that the Soviets also had to deal with that winter, and unlike the Nazis, they did so successfully.

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 week ago

Hey Matt christman exists too

[–] Poophammer@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

This was me too; history channel, video games and also midwit dad gets you this far.

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

Civ 4 is the best though. They got that right