245
submitted 7 months ago by fpslem@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A Boeing cargo airliner made an emergency landing in Florida on Thursday night after what its operator called “an engine malfunction” occurred shortly after takeoff, in the latest setback for the beleaguered company. A gaping hole where a paneled-over door had been at the fuselage plug area of Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 on Sunday 7 January 2024 Boeing opens factories to airlines and adds more checks after blowout Read more

Video taken by an eyewitness and posted to social media showed the 747-8 aircraft trailing flames and sparks from its left wing as it circled back to land at Miami international airport at about 10.30pm.

The operator, New York-based Atlas Air, said the plane “experienced an engine malfunction soon after departure”. Its crew of five “followed all standard procedures and safely returned” to the airport, it said in a statement, adding it would conduct a “thorough inspection to determine the cause”.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said on Friday it would be investigating the incident, adding that the eight-year-old Boeing 747-8 aircraft was heading for Puerto Rico. Its preliminary report stated that an inspection after the flight had landed revealed a “softball-sized hole” above one of its four engines, but did not specify when or how it occurred.

The plane, colloquially known as a jumbo jet, is equipped with four General Electric GEnx engines. The pilot reported a fire in the left wing engine closest to the fuselage, according to cockpit audio of the emergency call.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world 58 points 7 months ago

All of these airplane malfunction stories coming out in recent weeks are exactly the thing I wanted to see leading up to my flight tomorrow for the first real vacation I've had since before COVID. Thanks Universe.

[-] Cylusthevirus@kbin.social 30 points 7 months ago

Hey, it'll be ok. Let me show you a reassuring article. https://simpleflying.com/2023-aviation-safety/

It was actually a pretty safe year for aviation. Yeah, there have been problems, but you're more likely to be inconvenienced than anything. Hope you have an excellent vacation!

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

You can watch mentor pilot on YouTube - the safety process and investigations will make you feel much better :)

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Just remember that the drive to the airport is more risky than the flight.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

Like my dad would always say loudly while waiting in line for rollercoasters, "It's crazy to think about how these things are built by the lowest-bidder, isn't it?"

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Listen to some Alanis Morissette to calm your nerves.

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
[-] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

Isn’t it ironic?

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Don't worry if it's an Airbus (highly possible) or maybe a smaller jet like Bombardier, you have nothing to worry about.

Otherwise if it's a Boeing, gg no re lol

[-] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, heading to Ireland in February. Bit nervous for this go.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Oh well there's the problem right there, the engine is spraying out flames.

E: Wow that's really burning. Any pilots know why it seems so on fire? Why didn't the fire extinguishers work?

[-] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I’m no engineer but it’s probably got something to do with the softball sized hole in the engine near the fuselage. And I think you’re right about the flames that are spraying out being part of the problem. I mean it looks cool, but it can’t be safe to fly your plane around like that.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Critically, is the hole from something punching in or out?

[-] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Most likely. Great observation.

[-] AFLYINTOASTER@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

This guy is definitely an experienced engineer. Nobody else dodges bullshit like this.

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I would assume out as there aren't many frozen turkeys that far up

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'd say that's quite likely to be a turbine blade punching out, whatever the initial reason for the failure was.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 6 months ago

not an expert either, but I dont think the hole nor the flames are supposed to be there

[-] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

It depends on what causes the fire. There is a shutoff valve at the top of the pylon that should cut fuel and hydraulic lines to prevent anything combustible going into it. If the fire is caused by a fuel issue outside of that, such as a leak above the valve, the halon will not be able to extinguish it. The halon also discharges into the cowling so if the cowling is compromised it can’t extinguish it, or if the fire is inside the core or in the tailpipe it won’t make a difference. Finally, it’s designed so that in the worst case that pylon will simply burn clean off the wing leaving the rest of the plane and 3 other engines to continue flying. If I had a fire like that in a mountainous region I wouldn’t even touch the fire handle until after I get to a safe altitude. So long as the engine is producing thrust the fire spitting out behind it doesn’t really concern me that much for a short while.

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Gotta love sacrificial parts

Burning, multi ton engine falling from the sky is indefinitely safer than the other 3 and the attached passanger plane coming down, but sucks to be the person it hits.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

If you see a plane having issues in the sky, try to move away perpendicular to its path. If it goes down, it'll be hard to predict where it will end up since it can change direction as it dives, but anything falling off of it should generally follow its inertia. Though with thrusters, if there's even a bit of thrust still when it detaches, it can also wildly change its momentum.

Another thing to remember is that if something is falling but it doesn't look like it's moving, it's falling towards you. Again, move to the side and keep going until it looks like it is drifting to one side or another. Odds are very low that it will hit you even if you stand still, but that can help your odds if that makes you feel any better about it.

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Oh, being hit by an aircraft engine is one of those thing where if it happens - sorry the universe was involved in that one. My tombstone would probably say something like "doesn't like planes as much as he used to" or "here lies most of happy camper and a turbine blade we think has a smear or two".

[-] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

If it’s somewhere I need the trust for climb gradient it’s unlikely to land on anything important. A small chance of one tragedy is far better than a large chance of another.

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Oh, im not being sarcastic.

Like how the mounting bolts are designed in such a way the engine falls off without taking the important parts of the wing with it - sucks to be on the receiving end but it beats the shit out of the other options.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 17 points 6 months ago

Not a good few years for Boeing.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Few? Add to that The max was also grounded a few more years during Covid and not because of pandemic reasons.

[-] Space_Racer@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

To be fair, the engines are usually made by General Electric or Rolls Royce.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Sure, but they were still on a Boeing aircraft.

[-] Space_Racer@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Tell me you know nothing about aviation management without telling me you know nothing about aviation management.

Imagine blaming your car manufacturer for a flat tire when you hit a pothole or something. Or you didn't pay attention to the tire pressure light.

Engine failure could be caused by ingesting things or poor maintenance. There's zero chance Boeing has anything to do with it.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

I'm doing my part. I rescheduled all my flights involving 747s.

Surprisingly, when I talked to customer service, they said, "Absolutely understandable" as if they've been getting called left and right.

[-] Noedel@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

I thought the 737 max 9 was the fishy one?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 16 points 7 months ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 15 points 7 months ago
[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 4 points 7 months ago

Thank you. Everyone is very calm lol

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah, losing an engine is not uncommon. Pilots train for much more serious issues than losing the left inboard engine of a lightly-loaded 4-engine aircraft in calm, clear weather.

Here's a similar situation from awhile back, where the pilot felt the situation didn't even warrant an "emergency" declaration.

Isn't there a requirement that aircraft have to be able to make an unpowered landing?

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 12 points 7 months ago

Definitely.

There's various ways to do it. Most large aircraft have a tiny turbine engine in the tail called an Auxiliary Power Unit they can turn on to provide power and hydraulic pressure to control the plane in the event all engines are lost.

Even if they don't have an APU available, all large aircraft have a Ram Air Turbine, which is basically a windmill that pops out of the fuselage. The RAT spins in the airstream, providing power and hydraulic pressure.

Read up on the "Gimli Glider" and "Cactus 1549" for two prominent examples of jets becoming gliders.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 6 months ago

It is easy to lose one engine when you've got three more.

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 13 points 6 months ago

The only reason you’d land in Florida.

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Have a look at this:

ED PIERSON

Former Boeing 737 Program Senior Manager

Director, Foundation for Aviation Safety

[-] wahming@monyet.cc 4 points 6 months ago

What is with the first paragraph of the summary?

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Looks like OP copy pasted the article including the photo text and their captions. I bet the last two sentences of the first paragraph are a photo caption

[-] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I wonder if this is a bird strike. Engines on those planes are actually really well made. They just doing like when they suck in a bird into their spinning turbines at 10-25k rpm’s. Also happens at take off and landing more often

https://youtu.be/619fct0KTPI?si=tPuYetQMzMYGm0A6

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
245 points (97.3% liked)

News

22488 readers
4631 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS