1280
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 132 points 3 months ago
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 60 points 3 months ago

yea, but she's a dem, so it's allowed

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

It checks out. The double standard is written in crayon by the media.

[-] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 22 points 3 months ago

From the guy who whines about Democrats inciting violence by calling him a threat to democracy after he tried to overturn an election too stay in power.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 125 points 3 months ago

Were any shots fired?

Cause I've said it before, if no bullet is fired then it's not assassination attempt, it's just sparkling intimidation.

I thought this when I heard about the Manson chick was charged with attempting to shoot president Ford, when apparently it was an unloaded gun.

Interestingly, two women have been done for attempting to murder a president; both of which was against Ford within the same month within a small radius (maybe 100 miles).

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago

God forbid women have hobbies 😭

Trad women can’t have hobbies. Jeez.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago

That's unfair. They still have sex and barefoot-cooking.

True. Is punchbag a hobby too?

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I guess if sex is, then sure. It's basically the same thing, she just lays there and takes it. No real participation needed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago

It was concepts of an assassination attempt.

[-] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago

I think generally anything that is considered an attempted , the judicial system takes into account the intent of the person who is being accused. If the intent was to assassinate Trump, and the person had everything they needed to do it, and would have done it if they had not been stopped, then a real attempt was made.

[-] uranibaba@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

So the state has to prove that they would have done it not stopped and the defence has to prove the opposite (or something like that)?

[-] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 83 points 3 months ago

Also republicans: shoot at Donald trump

[-] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 75 points 3 months ago

And why is it his fellow republicans that are doing the shooting?

[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

My wife is in the "they're false-flag psyops" camp, whereas my position is "the ourobouros is eating its own tail."

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

My condolences. I don't think I could handle being married to a conspiracy theorist.

[-] TotalFat@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Turns out, neither could I!

[-] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

Must be the purging of the RINOs I've heard so much about

[-] Monument 3 points 3 months ago

I think the vast majority of his current supporters are self-hating and want to make others feel as badly about life as they do - without realizing it, of course.

I could see someone coming to resent him while still holding the Republican “deplorables” identity. He is functionally above the law. Still ripping people off. Still pretending to be something he’s not and will never be. And they still have crappy little lives.

But who knows? I’m just a rando.
We’ll never know the intent or reasons of the first shooter. It’ll be interesting once the second guy’s story comes out.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

Which party is it that has a culture of solving your problems with violence?

[-] mdurell@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

This isn't accurate. What they are saying is, "why isn't anyone shooting Kamala Harris."

[-] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

Former president and current chair of the face-eating leopard party shocked at the amount of hungry cats patrolling around their mansion.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 26 points 3 months ago

No no no not like that. You're supposed to let the tyrant win and then let them do all the tyrannical shit they said they'd do, then you buy your ~~cosplay outfit~~ defensive gear and get lit the fuck up by the military as is intended.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 22 points 3 months ago

You're supposed to fight the tyrant's troops, ergo other poors, not the important people!

[-] TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee 19 points 3 months ago
[-] aviationeast@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago

Please do not, accidents happen and I don'tthink your gentials would like that.

[-] unreachable@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago
[-] bastion@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago
[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

STOP KINKSHAMING ME 😤

[-] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Republicans don't believe that they need guns to defend against tyranny. They think they need guns because they are mine, they are scared, fantasy fulfillment of defending property or killing people in public. The oligarchical overlords in the republican party believe in guns because the peasants will kill the undesirables that they pitched to fight each other. The guns were never meant to be turned on the upper class that control the world

[-] Disgracefulone@discuss.online 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well yeah we all know that but.. that's what they say lol. "Defend against tyranny" sounds better than the truth. Even they're reallydontwanna smart usethisword enough to know that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

All of the rights on the Bill of Rights are good and we should support them all. Case in point ^^

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago

Ha-ha, but this makes it seem like we don't understand that the republicans think their opposition are the tyrants and they're the patriots that'll defend it.

It really is as simple as "nobody thinks they're the bad guy."

I'm not saying they're right I'm just saying, this is the answer as to "why" if you were wondering

[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

The people at the top know full well they're the tyrants. They only need the useful idiots to believe otherwise.

load more comments (1 replies)

lmao good one

[-] TotalFat@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Trump's not a tyrant. He's just a lil dick-tater.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago

Apparently the second guy merely hid in a bush with an AR, then left, and didn't shoot at anyone.

[-] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

The bit about him fleeing after being spotted seems to me like a detail that shouldn't be omitted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 3 months ago

Remember humans. Grow a brain first. Grab a gun later.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Guys, I hate to be controversial here, but maybe we can't extrapolate anything valuable about politicians based on two incidents of attempted assassination. I don't care about the opinions of these two crazy guys.

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 7 points 3 months ago

You are correct, it isn't scientific to extrapolate from such a paucity of data. We will have to have more data points to test any hypothesis.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

If it becomes a democratic majority of the US who has attempted to assassinate the guy, it would be right to listen to them about who should be president. But not because of the assassination thing.

[-] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately, US elections are determined by the assassinatorial college, so it would really boil down to a handful of swing assassins.

[-] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 3 points 3 months ago

Swing Assassins sounds like a fun multiplayer game, like Fall Guys or Gang Beasts.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

The two people are just two people, as you say. What we're actually talking about is how thousands of relatively famous Republicans and tens of millions of other Republicans react to the actions of those two.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
1280 points (99.2% liked)

Political Memes

5579 readers
1391 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS