People generally already don't want a ms account, so now they're making it even harder to get one lol morons
Some services require an MS or Google sign in
That's a fair point. But I've always seen it as a choice (sign in with ms, LinkedIn, google, or fb). Which services (besides Microsoft) require a ms account?
I forget the name but I was looking for free versions of no code app builders to make a productivity app of my own and one did not have a way to sign up with any email only sign up with Google or MS. Also had to create this second MS account, triggering this captcha, originally because I was using MS designer to generate free AI images but the fast tokens run out 15 a day. So to exploit AI, I always use multiple accounts and it is an MS service. I have like 10 MS accounts now due to using up the free OneDrive storage plans.
Edit: I never connect anything to FB. Meta is the only place that knows my real name and info. (Unfortunately). I also don't have LinkedIn.
Ah, that makes perfect sense. Also, with all those ms accounts tied to your IP, I can't blame them for the verification lol
I do it for all free services. Like AI where you have daily limits. I thought about VPN but I don't have the cost. It seems the only trusted free tier VPN is Proton bc they have a paid plan. I read good reviews and it didn't seem to slow down anything noticeably.
I didn't mean to sound like I disapproved at all. I'm all for what you're doing haha I've use proton's free tier. They're fine. I just don't really trust any vpn company that's based in the USA, due to their (completely understandable) requirement to keep USA data collection laws.
Proton is Swiss I believe.
I do love being wrong! I'll give them another look, then
I fucking hate captchas with a passion. They make me violent. Captchas should be illegal for the sake of my mental health. As a VPN user I see them 10x more than the average person.
Honestly captchas and the enshittification of the internet has completely driven me away from tech. Its become so user hostile that it simply is no longer worth the effort. There have been times where just to access a page I have to do five rounds of captchas.
Yeah, also, where did all the fun stuff go? Now it's just rage bait AI generated "articles" that pushes the dopamine button.
Where are 3D printer projects, robots, science, the arts, longevity science, DIY, and so on?
Mustn't we build a new internet without the idea that you should earn a living from whatever you do there?
Yeah I feel that. I spend lots of time on my computer offline. I got games, music, movies, even some books. I'm pretty much set. Part of me does want to run away and live in the woods though.
Pretty sure any decent model could easily solve that anyways. To borrow a quote about bears from the National Park Service, there's now significant overlap between your dumbest users and the smartest AI.
Pretty sure any decent model could easily solve that anyways.
True, but often these things also track the mouse movements or touch inputs and analyse those to see if they match natural human input or not. Of course advanced AI would be able to simulate proper inputs but most bots today would fail this check.
I am usually good at puzzles but this was hard to see on my phone. The pictures were much smaller in my version compared to the image. It wasn't an intelligence issue, it was a vision issue. Yet, many sites still just use a check box even the bank I work for does. Bigger companies than MS use a checkbox.
The checkbox is only the first step. When it's a google recapcha, cloudflare, etc that have the checkbox, this is the trigger to check. It sees how long since you loaded the page to when the checkbox is checked, how the mouse moved (perfectly straight line or instant jump to position indicates bot), and other info they have about previous visits (they store a cookie on your PC and when you go to another site they know where you have been and can compare that against the much higher risk of a blank slate user or against whether you've tried the same form 100 times).
If you pass that, as 90%+ of users should, then you see no more. If you are like me, you use a VPN and fail the first check and have to do endless recapcha "click on the busses" until you give up and quit the site.
I hate the google ones. Not only do they make life unbearable for people with VPNs, they use the info about what sites you visit to sell ads. And half the time you don't even know because the recapcha is the hidden in page one not the one in the form when you click the box.
The cloudflare ones are nicer. They virtually always pass me even though I'm behind a VPN, and although they technically can track me across sites (and probably do to track threat level), they aren't in the business of selling ads based on that data.
I have also generally had a nice experience with hCapcha. And recently I came across one that is using proof of work, mCaptcha - not sure what to think on that as it probably uses excess energy but it's nice to have your computer sort it out in the background. The idea here is a sort of rate limit. It takes a few seconds to do the work to pass the test (variable difficulty depending on how many accesses are happening on the site - i.e. whether they are under attack), but it all happens in the background while you fill the form in so you don't notice. It slows down bots but doesn't really detect them - more of a rate limiter or something designed to reduce the cost effectiveness of bots.
Thank you for coming to my ted talk.
I got this one the other day during a checkout process. This site lost the sale, I couldn't crack it.
I would have picked the only picture of a dog. Bees and Tapirs/Capybaras don't seem to fit
Me and all my friends agree, but the site did not accept that as the correct answer. I originally took that picture to get a second opinion and make sure I wasn't going crazy heh. I even tried for a new captcha, and it was still nonsense.
We did it, we beat AI. And humans.
Nah, the bots are way better at answering these captchas than people are.
Maybe the bee because one of the dogs is wearing a yellow jacket??
That one is terrible. I assume by "object" they mean "dog wearing accessories". That captcha was made to trick humans.
So, it's a little known fact that captchas and such like no longer test to see if you can solve something, because the bots have evolved to pass those kinds of tests.
They also tried to set them up to succeed where humans failed, but then bots evolved to pass those, too.
So now they look at how you fail or pass, or how you keep trying. Basically, they're checking if you're human by seeing how you respond to frustration.
seeing how you respond to frustration
Great UX design...
I think we're way past the need for an "if you can't auto detect bots then that's a you problem, dog" legislation. I guess you could be boring and call it anti-hostile experience regulation or whatever. but this shit needs to die like most Google projects.
try this one: https://iqcaptcha.us.to/
A few years ago when I was in college, I would've been able to solve that equation probably but that information has since left my brain lol.
Yup same, i looked it up and it all came back. However, it's still a completely useless knowledge in my normal adult life, though i'm a software engineer
My solution:
The outer square lines in the third column/row is the result of the difference between what exists in the first two items in that row/column. Only outer lines appearing only once will be in the 3rd shape. The center lines seem to be only center lines that appear in both shapes. Therefore x is 52, since all outer shapes cancel and there are no shared center lines. The rest is fairly simple.
The second derivative of f(x) is 78x + 22, so the answer is 78(52) + 22 + 52 = 4130
I'm not completely confident in this solution but it seems to be consistent with the known columns and rows.
I agree with your solution! GG
- f'(x) = 3(13)x²+2(11)x+10
- f"(x) = 6(13)x+22 = 72x + 22
- f"(52) = 4056 + 22 = 4 078
4078 + 52 = 4 130
The patterns work from top to bottom too.
The outside is XOR and the clock is AND.
Claude 3.5 sonnet seems to think the answer is 23
CharGPT o1 thinks it's 6, but the formula answer is 496 and just a "bonus"
o1 also "thought" about for a LONG TIME 1 minute and 11 seconds, which is the longest I've ever been able to get it to "think" about anything LMAO\
Notice how it doesn't explain what's going on in the pattern that got it to number 6. It's just a guess. If push comes to shove, anyone can make a straight faced lie that whatever option is the correct answer, they'll just avoid explaining it.
Apparently if you wanted to *defeat AI you just need to ask the user how many R's there are in strawberry.
*edit because dictation is stupid
Rapidly getting into the "overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists" levels of captcha
I've been staring at this thing for like 30 seconds, and I have zero clue what it's asking you to do.
I haven't seen one like this but I am a little tired of looking at grainy traffic lights.
Today I learned I was a robot.
They should just make a captcha that asks how many 'r's in 'strawberry'.
Is this c/anarchychess ?
Someone shared with me having to calculate the resistance of a resistor once. I sent them the color band chart to figure it out lol
Unplug the network cable and reboot. When it asks about an account there should be an option to join a domain. Select that and you can make a local account. *
*Ms changes this a bit so it may be inaccurate
I can't make a github account for that reason, smh.
Mildly Infuriating
Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating.
-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.