this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
31 points (97.0% liked)

Canada

9278 readers
1225 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 month ago (3 children)

He slaps 25% tariffs on Canadian oil. Then wants pipeline from Canada to US built. Yeah makes sense.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago

The instructions from his handlers must have been unclear

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oil is only a 10% tarrif.

Though im onboard with adding a 15% export tarrif to bring it in line.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Make it 25% and use the money to subsidize exports to any other country and undercut their exports.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He’s also threatening TSMC with tariffs if they don’t build a factory in the states. But it’s like, without them you are fucked, so I’m not sure why he thinks he has any power in the situation. Well, aside from threatening to pull defense from Taiwan, at which point now the US is basically threatening war which is crazy, and they may just do it, but I mean holy shit.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

If the US pulls defence from Taiwain and Taiwan falls to Chinese rule, the US still doesn't get TSMC. In fact, they would be handing an essential resource to an enemy nation.

The US has absolutely nothing to bargain with in that situation.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Handing Taiwan to China would be the stupidest geopolitical play in modern history. If the US did this the entire world would divest in America overnight.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

And yet it’s still a possibility because that’s where the US is right now. Trump already proved this with his dogshit withdrawl from afghanistan(completed by Biden, but all the terrible setup was the GOP). A nice little test run and great for setting precedence.

[–] tazzy@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But Trump said the USA didn’t need Canada for ANYTHING so why does he want this built??

[–] noride@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Because he wants to tell gullible Americans he made Canada do it.

[–] imvii@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago

I'd rather build a wall on our southern border - and make Trump pay for it.

[–] Atom@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Trump restarted it last term too. They only managed to build 8 percent of it before Biden revoked the approval again. The company then abandoned the project officially. It's just a political football at this point. Why bother putting money into something that will stall again in 2-4 years. That's not even considering the 25% tariff on the oil it would carry, if it were ever finished.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ehpolitical@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, my vote goes to you for next Canadian PM.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wait till you hear what I have planned.

  1. no more lobbying - fucken jail.

  2. no pay for politicians - you get a living allowance, a vehicle w/driver, and you live in "Government city" while you're in office. A nice life, but not so comfortable that you want to settle.

  3. with all but a few exceptions, service terms are 4 years long.

  4. after your service, you're accorded a rating, determined by the effectiveness of the changes you've made (or honestly tried to) , if you did good by the people, we rate you highly. A rating determines your pay scale in the private sector after you leave government. Did good? Live good. Determination of rating is part of the next-election-cycle vote, ie: decided by the people.

  5. no one top officer. Ie no pm or president. At least, not bestowed to a single individual. Maybe 3…

There was more. I came up with this on a road trip between Calgary and Vancouver once but I had a lot more youthful idealism back then, couched in the idea that being a public servant might be an appealing role for more volunteer-centric people instead of ...craven... power-hungry jackals. Maybe we need benevolent superintelligence to take over and actually run things, then we can have something like my system and pretend we're actually running the show.

Rather like we do now....

[–] ehpolitical@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sounds great! Just one more thing... can I have a firepit in my backyard???

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ehpolitical@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh my gosh, I would LOVE three! They won't even let me have ONE!

Great plan, by the way! I knew you were the one for the job when you said NO to Trump! 'Bout time someone did!

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago

All Canadian pipelines need to go east / west now and terminate at a Canadian coast.

[–] ehpolitical@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

But of course. Have we assigned anyone yet to give him milk & cookies at night and tuck him into bed.

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

He's greasy enough, he don't need anymore oil.