this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
171 points (98.9% liked)

Canada

9064 readers
1852 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes, Canada has a legal path to E.U. membership – but would it want this?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know if full membership is reasonable. Full membership would mean complying with all EU standards, those standards include electrical standards, and Canadian and European electrical standards are completely different. They run on 240V at 50Hz and Canada runs on 120V at 60Hz.

But, a closer alignment would be a great idea. Make it easier for workers to move between the EU and Canada. Harmonize some laws (for example, bring EU privacy and data protection laws to Canada). Require Canada to have more efficient vehicles and appliances.

[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 minutes ago

Surely those standards are occasionally amended to include historic exceptions.

[–] Kinperor@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not in favor of this.

We don't need more super-national institution telling us what to do. I'm on board for good relations and for taking ideas from them, but we need to stop giving power to distant institutions that aren't truly invested in our success.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So. Just cooperation at the provincial level, which we're excelling at? People cooperate, neighbourhoods, zones, towns, districts, regions, provinces and then no! Stop there! Is that the arbitrary line you've drawn?

[–] Kinperor@lemmy.ca 2 points 20 hours ago

I don't know man, the north Atlantic ocean isn't that arbitrary. I'm just saying that our population has been burned out worrying about super high level stuff that doesn't impact them as much as neighborhood activism.

I'm not accusing you of being a trumpist, but Trump literally called the US-Canada border an arbitrary line, so maybe try a different talking point for this topic?

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sure thing! I hope they drag their old masters in the UK along with them when they arrive. This will stretch the meaning of "Europe" a tad though.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If Turkey can join Canada certainly can

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At least part of turkey is on the European continent, or sub confident if you prefer.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

French Guiana is in South America yet is part of the EU. Besides, Canada is a former European colony and technically is still run by a European monarch.

But all that aside, both the EU and Canada are stronger together. Any justification needed to make people accept that fact should be used.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago

French Guiana is part of France. France is part of the EU. There's a little bit of a difference.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 46 points 2 days ago

I didn't have this on my bingo card when the year started, but hey, I'm all for it. Come join us, be one of us. We are all friends, except Hungary. They should just throw their government out.

Putin and Trump want to split the EU and destroy our unity. Let's make it bigger and better than they ever expected.

[–] thehowlingnorth@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 days ago (24 children)

I'm in. I'll miss the Loonie, but Europe's looking pretty good these days.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Using the euro is optional! Many countries kept their own currency.

[–] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are there any non-founding-member countries that kept their own currency?

I believe it's mandatory for all new members.

[–] CanadaPlus 6 points 1 day ago

Yes, it is. You can delay it indefinitely, though, and Romania is still on the leu. Other members have blocked them from making the switch, even.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We can still call the coins loonies and toonies, why not?

[–] Rogue@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure you get to choose the illustrations on Euros issued in your country so you can continue the theme. Then as it gets mixed in with currency elsewhere the terminology might catch on in continental Europe

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Norweigians are just being weird because of their oil riches. They fear (perhaps legitimately) that we'll tax those off of them.

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago

At the very least, joining with their economic standards is a path we should move towards.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 20 points 2 days ago (7 children)

The EU requires unanimity among its existing members in order to add a new member. It's not impossible, but getting Orban to agree to it is, I think, a much bigger stumbling block than the article implies. Any "concessions" Orban demands to accept Canada would themselves have to be unanimously agreed to by existing members.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

The EU requires unanimity among its existing members

Wow, that's a rule that doesn't scale well. Especially since apparently expelling a country requires unanimity too.

[–] NewDay@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

Orban has to vote for Canada. Why? His regime will be over in 14 days if he does not get the EU money. Orban's biggest rival is in first place according to the latest polls. If he wants to be re-elected, he cannot sabotage EU policy.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 2 days ago (7 children)

We should just create EU 2.0 without them, with proper rules to handle that bullshit in the future, and... I don't know, Blackjack maybe.

[–] CanadaPlus 4 points 1 day ago

I mean, we're already talking about a NATO 2.0, aren't we?

Of course, that's their decision to ultimately make.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I want all of the consumer protections EU citizens get like being able to side load apps on iPhones etc.

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago

Some privacy laws would be nice, eh?

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago

Absolutely. This would be such a boon to both Canada and the EU

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί