this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
489 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck AI

6540 readers
1063 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I guess I'm glad I was never a big Twat, so Bluesky wasn't a place of refuge for me the way Lemmy was when Reddit went off the rails.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FE80@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

Jay Graber is not CEO anymore, but that doesn't mean she hasn't been busy.

Valorizing CEOs is for idiots and suckers.

[–] Bongles@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 hours ago

With Attie, users apparently enter what are essentially chatbot prompts. The app will process whatever the user types, find posts they might be into across Bluesky and other atpro-friendly networks, and use that to customize their feed and overall experience.

It sounds like a stupid app, but of everything going on, this is just not something I care about.

[–] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 9 points 3 hours ago

From the article:

New Bluesky CEO Toni Schneider told TechCrunch, “We’ve launched a lot of things inside Bluesky — Starter Packs and custom feeds, and all those kinds of things. This is a standalone product, and it’s the first one that’s built by Jay’s new team.” [emphasis added]

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

It's literally a twitter clone, what did you expect?

Just get off twitter, FFS. That entire website is a bane on humanity.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago)

How is it a bane on humanity, the different opinions people have or are you saying its all AI now?

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They're not doing anything to the app though, this is a standalone thing.

[–] KiloGex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Yet. They aren't doing anything to the app yet.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No surprise. Y'all are dumb if you think the point of all social media isn't to just make money.

[–] versionc@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Does that include Lemmy and Mastodon?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Both of those are federated options with no central company behind them. They have issues, but not because they have a corporate algorithm feeding their users.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

So not all social media, gotcha.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 56 minutes ago

Is it Social Media is there's no algo? No one called IRC or old forums "social media" when they were at their heights.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 7 points 5 hours ago

It's funny, I bailed when they started doing age checks. It made my life better

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 24 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Use mastodon and the fediverse

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 18 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (4 children)

Dude, not trying to throw shade at Mastodon, but where on Lemmy I get tons of interaction, on Pixelfed and Loops I get a solid amount and on Bluesky I get plenty in comments and some on my own posts...

I have had ZERO ANYTHING on Mastodon, and the content I post is more or less the same as the others. The app looks sleek and upload quality is better than the others, but it feels like being shadowbanned on Meta... Photos, memes, text, political, personal, you name it, nothing.

I make a point to use each of these apps once a day. No one is reciprocating anything on Mastodon. Again, it feels like being shadowbanned. I honestly hate it at this point. I'm trying to engage with those people and they're giving me nothing.

Maybe it's literally a technical issue, no joke. Or maybe I'm like the old lady in the "If my phone isn't broken then why don't my relatives call me?" story

[–] versionc@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

I don't use Mastodon but sometimes I stumble upon other users on Mastodon. The vast majority of times, they scream out into the void. Thousands of posts, zero interaction.

[–] poop@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I have the opposite experience. I can post the same thing on both bs and mastodon and got lots of replies on mastodon and crickets on bs.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Damn... 😐

[–] jamescathybleak@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

For me it's not as bad as you described, people reply if i ask something or comment but i don't know how to find the content and the people that I'd like to follow. I do follow some accounts that I like but still my feed feels dead :( I think Lemmy is easier because it's a "subject/interest first" place whereas mastodon (or twitter) is "people first" place. I was never a twitter fan either so I actually don't quite know what to expect from it neither.

I still keep visiting Mastodon after I get angry to Instagram though, which happens quite often (I know mastodon is a twitter alt and we have pixelfed for ig)

[–] versionc@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Making your posts available for search on Mastodon is opt-in through the use of hashtags. That makes it very difficult to find people to follow.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

That's true about Lemmy. It's been a good replacement for both Reddit and Facebook groups, though smaller.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I'm the same, Mastodon is good for some neiche topics. But for following news etc, it's a no go.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Sensationalist headline that is not Gizmodo's. OP, please use the original headline.

This is a standalone product, and it’s the first one that’s built by Jay’s new team.”

This is a product built by a group at Blusky. It's not part of their core app.

[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Are you lost? This ain't some news comm, it's Fuck AI and I'll title my posts any fucking way I want.

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 7 points 5 hours ago

I can kinda see the idea. Instead of putting the AI recommendation engine in the app, you have a separate app for it. Instead of relying on your behaviour, you decide what to prompt it to recommend.

But I think I'm probably being way too optimistic with this perspective description. If it is like I just described, though, I can see why some people would want to use it.

But it would likely still have to rely on collecting behavioural data to be any good, and it would cost humongous amounts of energy and resources... For very little benefit.

[–] zenzanzoo@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

It seems this fediverse thing is the real innovation, not twitter clones.

[–] rmrf@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

ITT: headline readers that judge with their full weight on minimal information

[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Are you lost?

"A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype."

We don't need nuance to hate on every appearance of AI enshittifying something.

[–] rmrf@lemmy.ml 0 points 49 minutes ago

I have no problem with people talking shit on AI, my comment is about the fact people are reacting to what they think the subject of the headline is as opposed to what is written in the article.

FYI "are you lost" is a pretty rude way to start a conversation. I wasn't trying to hurt you

[–] massi1008@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Lemmy really is just like reddit :)

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 36 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Bsky enhittified the day it was formed.
The problem: Twitter is being centrally controlled, by one large corporation which can be corrupted.
The solution: A new "company" with a "trusted board" instead of investors!
Bsky is slowly becoming twitter because someone who thinks like businessman can't comprehend running a project without a company and a "trusted board" behind it, with capital from elsewhere fueling the whole thing. Jack Dorsey probably had good intentions, but he's just too near sighted (or not the right person) to create a viable alternative disconnected from the business minded framework a true open decentralized twitter replacement needed.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's basically just Twitter in the early days, way before the Musk takeover. It will follow the same path eventually, as all VC funded tech

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

People forget that Twitter turned to shit long before musk showed up. They were the ones who refused to enforce their own TOS for trump for years.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 hours ago

i stopped using twitter around 2013 after adopting it in 2007. i deleted my account entirely when it sold

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

As fake as it may sound, chief innovation officer is a real job title

Oh wow, an AI feature that nobody asked for. Such innovation, much wow!

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

At my second-to-last job, the company did a reorganization and I was given the title of "Visionary". It really pissed me off because I was a programmer who actually did all the work. I also knew that it meant I was going to be laid off soon and sure enough I was.

[–] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 32 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Does it come from the US?

Is it open source?

Are the people behind it overwhelmingly wealthy?

If (TRUE, FALSE, TRUE) 100% you should stay away from it.

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 31 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I'd swap "open source: false" with "closed source: true" so the pattern is consistent.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 9 points 7 hours ago

I considered it but not closed source doesn't automatically mean open source so I preferred to be more rigorous.

[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 49 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ok it's not BlueSky as in the BlueSky social media website. It's another separate tool they're developing.

The title is very misleading.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 126 points 15 hours ago (11 children)

Everything was pointing Mastodon until Bluesky came. And guess what? Turns out the problem is and always has been corporations and centralized ownership.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›