this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11813 readers
537 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Again:

This is fraud

If I commit fraud, I go to jail

Track down the manufacturer that put the label on it, and fucking jail those in charge. Jail the CEO

You want this enshitification of everything to end?

Jail CEO's

This shit will end real quick once we start jailing the CEO's that decide to do this shit in the first place

But here we are...

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

But ACER doesn't inspect syrup in cans that are sold directly by producers to grocery stores, which is how Bourdeau sells his syrup.

"Our mandate is to analyze large containers," Clermont said.

"We don't classify maple syrup from a producer who sells directly to a supermarket."

Lagacé said such syrup can be subject to random spot checks, but not systematically tested like syrup in bulk.

Nice loophole. Maybe they should start.

[–] julian@activitypub.space -2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

... and how, pray tell, are they supposed to do this, logistically?

Station inspectors in every maple syrup farm? Who's paying for that?

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 5 points 4 hours ago

They do spot checks now, sometimes. And they do regular checks on large containers. Do you think those containers are shipped to them? Who do you think is paying for those inspections now? How do you think this is any different for inspections for lettuce or other produce?

Absolutely, large containers are easier to check. And yes, it would be logistically impossible to check every batch that was canned and sold like these were. But regular, unannounced spot checks of the canned product would mean that every time you adulterated the product would be a risk to be caught, and you can guarantee that if every can they bought in this investigation was adulterated that it wasn't a one-off thing.

[–] TheDoctorDonna@piefed.ca 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

This is potentially dangerous. Maple syrup gets used a sugar replacement in a lot of things for a reason.

[–] Teppa@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I learned this from a recent unnamed podcast with a certain unnamed Canadian politician.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 1 points 4 hours ago

What reason? Other than that it tastes good, I mean. Maple syrup is mostly sugar.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is an urgent matter of national security. Call Ann Murray, Rush, The Montreal Canadians, Rick Mercer and anyone still alive from SCTV to form an investigation squad. Mark Carney needs to invoke the notwithstanding clause to strip the perpetrators of their constitutional right to a fair trial and we'll jump straight to summary execution.

Then we'll apologize to Canadians and celebrate reconciliation with a pancake breakfast at a sugar shack.

[–] mrbn@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 hours ago

In Quebec, maple syrup offenses are the only way someone can get the death penalty. /s