this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
38 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10133 readers
501 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The scientific vessel to replace the decommissioned Canadian Coast Guard Ship Hudson is now $1 billion over its original budget.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Military procurement is ridiculously expensive, but...we need these damn ships.

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This one's not military, but a research vessel for Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Research or not it is Coast Guard, which is...well, military-adjacent, at least.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Except that it isn't. The Canadian Coast Guard is a purely civilian organization. For example, they don't partake in the war on drugs like their American counterparts do, and they don't have weapons either.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Although CCG personnel are neither a naval nor law enforcement force, they may operate CCG vessels in support of naval operations, or they may serve an operational role in the delivery of maritime law enforcement and security services in Canadian federal waters by providing a platform for personnel serving with one or more law enforcement agencies.

Interesting, so it's more of a civilian paramilitary organization? I'd say the vessels are still needed, even if it's not directly military

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No not even paramilitary, their assistance to military and law enforcement is limited to transport basically. Bus drivers essentially...

CG is great, it's annoying that this project is over budget, but I have no problem with them getting funded and equipped.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"I'm not wrong! I'm just sort of wrong ...."

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thank you for your invaluable contribution.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

It was about as valuable as your second comment. Your original comment I agree with, however.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It comes with a free can of maple syrup though.

Sold in the room!

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

That's the cost of keeping ship building industry alive in Canada. It's likely cheaper if the Koreans or Chinese built it.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

WHEN a project-cost increases TO A FACTOR-OF-5-TIMES the budgeted cost,

THEN criminal-convictions should be happening.

Just as normal commercial-contracts have a "kill this contract" point, for noncompliance, so too must public-taxpayer-payed projects, at 1.4x or 2x hard-max.

Extortion isn't acceptable, "just because it is government".

Take that extra-billion out of elected-authorities' pensions & pay!

Make the ones who mismanage pay.

Accountability, right?

: P

( :