Identifying an arguments fallacy by name usually doesn't resolve an argument
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world
7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
PhD is philosophy doctor.
My favorite is Lakoff's category theory. He notes that philosophy largely pretends that categories are defined based on rules of inclusion and exclusion, but in fact human thinking is mostly based around categories defined by a prototypical example and various relations to that example. So, e.g., a penguin and a sparrow are both birds, but a sparrow is more like the prototypical bird, since it's smaller and it flies.
Many of the great philosophical questions over the years have been about trying to decide on precise rules of inclusion and exclusion for categories, even though the closer people look, the less it seems like there's a meaningful boundary (e.g. "life" vs "non-living," where you start to see things like viruses, prions, etc. that don't fit cleanly into either category).
There are many branches in philosophy, and it's easy to mix them up. Depends on what you're into.
- Ethics: notions of right and wrong and moral values.
- Epistemology: questions of knowledge. How do we know what we know.
- Metaphysics: ideas of space, time, existence.
- Aesthetics: appreciation of art, beauty, music, literature, etc.
- Logic: for the math-oriented. How do we reason and arrive at conclusions? If X, then Y.
- Language: how we communicate. Meaning of words, symbols, and metaphors.
- Phrenology: method of relieving cranial pressures.
- Science: how to reason about the physical world.
- Religion: Understanding the divine and how we fit in.
I can just say the old Greek already knew everything.
-
Cogito ergo sum.
-
Nothing really matters.
-
Diogenes was a cool dude.
Stoicism helps massively in a chaotic world like today
Idealism is intellectual jerking off. Quite fun!
People get upset if you try to say they aren't real
Cars have windows and can move.
Houses have windows and cannot move.
Therefore it's not the windows that make the car move, but something else entirely.
- PJ Evans
Logical and correct!
All marxist analyses are analyses of failure.
Care to elaborate, im afraid i dont quite understand. Do you mean the countries that claim(ed) to be socialist or that marx' analyses and argumentation is wrong?
I know that Ayn Rand is an charlatan posing as philosopher
Almost everything I know I learned from existential comics. This is one of my favorites https://existentialcomics.com/comic/540
I do know about something and don't call me Philosophy
A philosophy major explained to me that studying philosophy isn't really as useless as it seems. That's because whenever philosophers start to understand what they're doing, they stop calling it philosophy and branch into real scientists. He said it's unfair to judge the value of philosophy by the useless proto-sciences currently under study, but to consider the whole history of philosophy which includes every other field of study one can get a PhD in.
I always get a kick out of the overlap between philosophy and math when it comes to formal logic/ proofs. Like, the underpinnings for dissecting an argument are exactly the same regardless of whether the discussion is about number theory or what it means to have consciousness.
The only thing I know is that I know nothing.
I'm not even there yet 😔
Did a senior paper 20 years ago marrying the concepts of naturalistic and normative epistemology.
The takeaway was that it doesn't matter if you can't actually prove that you know or don't know anything. You have to live and have always lived as if you can/do know things.
This is like, my favorite saying lol
Lo unico que se
es que no se nada
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Except for Zeno!
Machiavelli was not saying to be mean as much as be prepared to be mean.
I think Ender of enders game had the same philosophy, and he ended up xenociding a whole species.
The philosopher Schopenhauer absolutely HATED noisy people. He once threw a cleaning lady down a set of stairs because she was making too much noise.
Later he wrote a treatise where he posed that a persons tolerance towards noise is inversely related to their intelligence.
Also, one should not remove the anal beads as if one is attempting to start a lawnmower.
Yay that makes me a very intelligent person.
And I am allowed to throw people down the stairs!
(/s)
That's deep.
Depends on the number of beads.
That last one is kind of a natural philosophy
Time is an illusion. Lunch-time, doubly so.
Death is but a doorway, time is but a window, I'll be back.
-Vigo
Reality is an illusion. The universe is a hologram. Buy gold. Bye!!!
We can talk about normality until the cows come home…
What’s home?…
What is normal?…
What are cows?!
I watched The Good Place like 5 times, so I know just about everything about moral philosophy. I also took computer science, so I know to always give lots of chopsticks when serving a group of philosophers.
Did we watch the same show? I thought it was mostly about how Jacksonville, Florida was a weird place with weird people.
And something about whether Good Janet had free will, and if a Judge could be an alcoholic or something
Absurdism. Life, the universe, existence, is absurd and irrational.
It's comforting and liberating to accept.
Grasping the idea that things don't always make sense, and that's it's okay when they don't, is like setting down a heavy load you didn't realize you were carrying.
Waaaait a minute, Monty Python does not have an S in it! ALWAYS knew it. Bunch of frauds.
Wow, gotta love the Mythons!
Doesn't it make you wonder...What's it all about?